Jump to content

  

97 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Hairston a good enough starter?



Recommended Posts

Posted

Ive been watching Hairston Closely on NFL Game Rewind. I know Buddy says we can win with him, but what does TBD think?

where's your cousin captain foresight for the answer? :P

 

Seriously though what did you see on rewind? Anything that stuck out? I don't have the option of that but do pay attention to the lines and thought Hairston did well for a rookie. Add in the whole no tc, no offseason activities, thrown to the wolves and I voted yes to this question. However I would like to hear what you have to say about it.

Posted

For a rookie who was a mid-round draft pick, I don't know how anyone could say he doesn't have the potential to be a starter. The kid was a heckuva solid pick up for us. We need to find one or two more Chris Hairstons THIS year.

Posted

where's your cousin captain foresight for the answer? :P

 

Seriously though what did you see on rewind? Anything that stuck out? I don't have the option of that but do pay attention to the lines and thought Hairston did well for a rookie. Add in the whole no tc, no offseason activities, thrown to the wolves and I voted yes to this question. However I would like to hear what you have to say about it.

Hes on vacation ;)

 

Frankly I thought he struggled more than people realize. He pretty good at getting in the way and doesnt get beat on the edge often but he can be bull rushed and collapsed that way. Personally I'm not ready to anoint him the starter just yet

Posted

I give Hairston some slack because he was a rookie with NO OTAs, and then missed a bunch of time due to injury, yet he still came in and at least held his own.

 

I also dont see a Tackle outside of Kalil, that for certain, would come in and beat him out for the spot.

 

So yes, Im fine with Hairston starting if that is how it works out. Another year in the system, playing next to the same guys, and with a full offseason worth of workouts and coaching... could be worse.

 

I would still like to see the Bills bring in a couple of OTs from the 3rd-5th rounds to push the competition, and provide depth behind Hairston and Pears.

Posted

I can't cite any specific stats or plays or anything, but I felt like Spiller didn't look like a superstar until Hairston took over for Bell last season. I remember Hairston absolutely crushing guys with blocks in the run game. He wasn't always perfect in the pass-blocking, but certainly a good rookie season. FYI, at the 2011 combine, he had 33 reps on the benchpress, the highest of any OT player.

Posted

He's a guy that can play in a pinch and fill in for a few games. However, he still has a long way to go to develop and at this point I don't feel extremely confident with him as the starting LT right now.

Posted

Personally I think at this point he is a better tackle then both Rieff or Martin so I would not waste a first on them. The only linemen I would take in the first is DeCastro and then kick Levitre to LT as he is a pretty good LT and Hairston can then be used as the backup swing tackle.

Posted (edited)

I'm okay with him penciled in as the starter in August as long as there is a viable "Plan B" if he ***** the bed prior to the season opener. I would like them to avoid what happened last year when the Bills counted on Merriman last year only to end up playing guys like Spencer Johnson at OLB as "Plan B", after Merriman to no ones surprise....went down for the season.

Edited by LabattBlue
Posted

As a rookie with no offseason last year he was solid, with a full offseason of coaching and work he can only get better, there is no rookie who will start over him in week one

Posted

As a rookie with no offseason last year he was solid, with a full offseason of coaching and work he can only get better, there is no rookie who will start over him in week one

 

Agreed. If Buddy can find another Hairston or two in the middle rounds for depth and competition then it would be just dandy. It will be interesting what will happen if Kalil ends up sliding to 10. Probably won't happen though.

Posted

I say yes.

 

I thought he looked pretty good without the advantages of a full offseason of preparation and practice.

 

For him, I think overall physical condition is a big factor here. If he comes to camp fit, he'll be real good.

Posted

I give Hairston some slack because he was a rookie with NO OTAs, and then missed a bunch of time due to injury, yet he still came in and at least held his own.

 

I also dont see a Tackle outside of Kalil, that for certain, would come in and beat him out for the spot.

 

So yes, Im fine with Hairston starting if that is how it works out. Another year in the system, playing next to the same guys, and with a full offseason worth of workouts and coaching... could be worse.

 

I would still like to see the Bills bring in a couple of OTs from the 3rd-5th rounds to push the competition, and provide depth behind Hairston and Pears.

DrD is rigtht. He'll due. As Leslie Frasier just said, LTs arent game changers anyway.

 

Leave top 10 LT picks to teams like the Browns and Miami.

Posted

I'm surprised by the optimism of these results, frankly.

 

Seven uneventful starts during a dismal losing streak but, hey, we know he'll get better! It'd would certainly be a nice story, but I don't think Hollywood's ready to buy the movie right just yet...

Posted

I'm okay with him penciled in as the starter in August as long as there is a viable "Plan B" if he ***** the bed prior to the season opener. I would like them to avoid what happened last year when the Bills counted on Merriman last year only to end up playing guys like Spencer Johnson at OLB as "Plan B", after Merriman to no ones surprise....went down for the season.

Agreed.

 

Maybe Buddy has McNeil on his speed dial for first thing Saturday night...

×
×
  • Create New...