Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 21, 2012 Posted April 21, 2012 I want to end up with an off. tackle AND Michael Kendricks, the middle linebacker from cal. So a trade down would be an ideal scenario. That boy is a stud. Like to see him over Sheppard.
papazoid Posted April 25, 2012 Author Posted April 25, 2012 i have a hard time believing that the bills own chris brown would pick Mark Barron in his mock draft, "if" the bills were really interested in him. i think the bills are trying to get dallas or philly to bite on a trade of draft picks.
PromoTheRobot Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 What I don't get is how showing interest in a player gets a team to trade picks with you? For example, if the Cowboys want Barron, and the Bills show interest in Barron BUT would consider a trade of picks, then how interested are we really? If anything the Cowboys would trade with the Dolphins or Panthers to get ahead of the Bills. PTR
K-9 Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 What I don't get is how showing interest in a player gets a team to trade picks with you? For example, if the Cowboys want Barron, and the Bills show interest in Barron BUT would consider a trade of picks, then how interested are we really? If anything the Cowboys would trade with the Dolphins or Panthers to get ahead of the Bills. PTR One reason would be that if the Cowboys jump ahead to get Barron, then another player potentially drops to us. GO BILLS!!!
Lurker Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 (edited) What I don't get is how showing interest in a player gets a team to trade picks with you? For example, if the Cowboys want Barron, and the Bills show interest in Barron BUT would consider a trade of picks, then how interested are we really? If anything the Cowboys would trade with the Dolphins or Panthers to get ahead of the Bills. PTR This line of thinking, I suppose... Edited April 25, 2012 by Lurker
papazoid Posted April 25, 2012 Author Posted April 25, 2012 What I don't get is how showing interest in a player gets a team to trade picks with you? For example, if the Cowboys want Barron, and the Bills show interest in Barron BUT would consider a trade of picks, then how interested are we really? If anything the Cowboys would trade with the Dolphins or Panthers to get ahead of the Bills. PTR assuming said player is there at #10....buddy says he is the best available player and that he will stay true to his board.....unless someone makes him a better offer.
Delete This Account Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 Have the Vikings done that (missed their selection) more than once? I remember the Vikes doing that a few years ago, but has it happened (to any team) any other time? I don't think so. part of it had to do with lowering the player's contract value back before the latest cba, when rookie first-round pick contract values were very expensive. if you were confident the player you desired would be available after the team behind you picked, then you could wait a pick or two perhaps and cut millions of dollars off the player's rookie deal. jw
Haven Moses Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 The Barron and Tannehill stuff is a smoke screen. Buddy is trying to get others to jump ahead of him, so the guy he wants slips. So the 8 of the 9 taken ahead of us are 3 QB's, Kalil, Blackmon, Richardson, Barron, Claibourne. That leaves at least 2 of these guys: Reiff, DeCastro, Kuekley, Floyd. One of these 4 is who Buddy really wants.
Delete This Account Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 The Barron and Tannehill stuff is a smoke screen. Buddy is trying to get others to jump ahead of him, so the guy he wants slips. So the 8 of the 9 taken ahead of us are 3 QB's, Kalil, Blackmon, Richardson, Barron, Claibourne. That leaves at least 2 of these guys: Reiff, DeCastro, Kuekley, Floyd. One of these 4 is who Buddy really wants. but what if it's a double-fake. maybe the Bills are letting all that stuff out there so that people start thinking like you, discounting Barron and Tennehill, in order to make some people start thinking that the team's really after Reiff, DeCastro, Kuechly or Floyd and then they go after someone else? ... or maybe it's a triple-fake ... jw
Beerball Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 You read it here first (unless you read it somewhere else first in which case I'm nothing but a no good hack). Bills will trade down with SD, picking up their #18, #41 plus their 4th round selection.
thebandit27 Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 You read it here first (unless you read it somewhere else first in which case I'm nothing but a no good hack). Bills will trade down with SD, picking up their #18, #41 plus their 4th round selection. How can Buffalo pick up #41? We already have that pick...I think you mean that we'd pick up #49 (SD's 2nd rounder).
NickelCity Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 (edited) You read it here first (unless you read it somewhere else first in which case I'm nothing but a no good hack). Bills will trade down with SD, picking up their #18, #41 plus their 4th round selection. The Bills already have the #41 selection. I assume you mean the Bills would geet SD's #18, #49, and #110 (4th rounder)? Interesting. EDIT: ha, quick work Bandit. Edited April 25, 2012 by NickelCity
peterpan Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 (edited) You read it here first (unless you read it somewhere else first in which case I'm nothing but a no good hack). Bills will trade down with SD, picking up their #18, #41 plus their 4th round selection. I would love this trade. I would then take Decastro at 18, and use our 2nd and 3rd, and SDs 4th, to trade back up into the early 20s and draft Glenn (Per Mayocks Mock we could land both players in those spots). I would have effectively used the Bills first two picks (10 and 41) to draft Glenn and Decastro AND moved our 3rd round selection UP to #49, where we should be able to land a decent WR or CB. I just love those big Studs on the O and D lines. One can dream, PIXEYLAND!!!!!!! Edited April 25, 2012 by peterpan
Lurker Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 The Bills already have the #41 selection. I assume you mean the Bills would geet SD's #18, #49, and #110 (4th rounder)? I'd be very happy with that. The second round seems to be the place to fish this year...
Beerball Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 How can Buffalo pick up #41? We already have that pick...I think you mean that we'd pick up #49 (SD's 2nd rounder). My apologies, #49 is correct.
Haven Moses Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 I love Buddy, but I don't believe a word he says this week.
DefenseWins Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 but what if it's a double-fake. maybe the Bills are letting all that stuff out there so that people start thinking like you, discounting Barron and Tennehill, in order to make some people start thinking that the team's really after Reiff, DeCastro, Kuechly or Floyd and then they go after someone else? ... or maybe it's a triple-fake ... jw Relax. We'll all know in just over 27 hours from now....
KOKBILLS Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 I would love this trade. I would then take Decastro at 18, and use our 2nd and 3rd, and SDs 4th, to trade back up into the early 20s and draft Glenn (Per Mayocks Mock we could land both players in those spots). I would have effectively used the Bills first two picks (10 and 41) to draft Glenn and Decastro AND moved our 3rd round selection UP to #49, where we should be able to land a decent WR or CB. I just love those big Studs on the O and D lines. One can dream, PIXEYLAND!!!!!!! Really? You would Trade down for DeCastro? Another non-need position? I think in a Trade down the target would be Kirkpatrick, Glenn, or maybe even Steven Hill at #18...
Delete This Account Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 Relax. We'll all know in just over 27 hours from now.... how can anyone relax at this time of year. now, it appears the Bills just might be trading down. what if that's just a ruse and they're really trading up? ... wouldn't that make it a triple-fake with a flip? jw
NewEra Posted April 25, 2012 Posted April 25, 2012 1335376212[/url]' post='2445702']i have a hard time believing that the bills own chris brown would pick Mark Barron in his mock draft, "if" the bills were really interested in him. i think the bills are trying to get dallas or philly to bite on a trade of draft picks. Exactly 1335376556[/url]' post='2445712']What I don't get is how showing interest in a player gets a team to trade picks with you? For example, if the Cowboys want Barron, and the Bills show interest in Barron BUT would consider a trade of picks, then how interested are we really? If anything the Cowboys would trade with the Dolphins or Panthers to get ahead of the Bills. PTR And that's what we want. If Barron isn't on our radar, we want someone ahead of us to take him, allowing a coveted player to possibly fall to them. Makes a lot of sense.
Recommended Posts