Jump to content

espn's Mel Kiper Names Teams' Top 3 Picks


Recommended Posts

Kiper's 'Grade A' Draft:

Mel plays GM of every AFC team in picking Rounds 1-3 of the draft

 

When I do mock drafts, I'm not simply giving my opinion on where players will go. In fact, I disagree with some of the picks I'm putting down. But the mocks are based on a combination of where players are being valued across the league, how I feel those players are valued by individual teams, what the top needs for each team are, whether they value need over the best player available and so on. It's not an editorial. For this, I was asked, "What would you do if you were picking?" So I gave it a shot. I've listed what I see as the top needs for each team, and I've gone ahead and made the picks that fill needs based on where I have players ranked. A few ground rules:

 

1. At each spot, I'm making the pick best for that team at that spot. I won't pass on an ideal pick for the Bills at No. 10 just because that player would be a great fit at No. 11.

2. There are no duplicates anywhere.

3. I will suggest good spots to trade down, but I won't rearrange the board.

4. This is for fun! One pick can derail a whole draft, so in no way do I think this is how it might look.

 

With that in mind, let's go through it. I'll discuss motives for each team in the analysis.

 

AFC East

 

Buffalo Bills

 

 

Top needs: LT, WR, OLB, CB, QB

 

 

Rd 1 (10) WR Michael Floyd

Rd 2 (41) OT Jonathan Martin

Rd 3 (71) LB Mychal Kendricks

 

 

Analysis: Not in order, but I've hit my top three needs if I'm Buffalo. There are front offices that have Floyd as the top wide receiver in the draft, so getting him at No. 10 is pretty fair, given I've had him at about that spot on my Big Board. Floyd is a big target who will pick up the route tree quickly and give Ryan Fitzpatrick a much-needed new option. Martin is a guy who once carried a solid first-round grade and could be a total steal at No. 41. Kendricks has immense physical talent and could be plugged in immediately, something the team did with Kelvin Sheppard last year.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me in as well!

 

It does make me wonder: every year, there's a player or position that winds up going much later than we expected. Now, that's usually not OT, because those usually tend to go higher than expected if anything (b/c it's such an important position), but maybe this could be the year? Let's face it, after Kalil, all the OT prospects have some knocks on them. It does remind me a little of 2008(?) when we were debating Malcolm Kelly, Limas Sweed, Devin Thomas, and James Hardy at #11 overall, and all of them wound up being available for us in round 2. And of course, all of them wound up being extremely disappointing. As long as that last part doesn't repeat, I'd be really happy with Martin or Glenn or even Adams falling to us at #41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper's 'Grade A' Draft:

Mel plays GM of every AFC team in picking Rounds 1-3 of the draft

 

When I do mock drafts, I'm not simply giving my opinion on where players will go. In fact, I disagree with some of the picks I'm putting down. But the mocks are based on a combination of where players are being valued across the league, how I feel those players are valued by individual teams, what the top needs for each team are, whether they value need over the best player available and so on. It's not an editorial. For this, I was asked, "What would you do if you were picking?" So I gave it a shot. I've listed what I see as the top needs for each team, and I've gone ahead and made the picks that fill needs based on where I have players ranked. A few ground rules:

 

1. At each spot, I'm making the pick best for that team at that spot. I won't pass on an ideal pick for the Bills at No. 10 just because that player would be a great fit at No. 11.

2. There are no duplicates anywhere.

3. I will suggest good spots to trade down, but I won't rearrange the board.

4. This is for fun! One pick can derail a whole draft, so in no way do I think this is how it might look.

 

With that in mind, let's go through it. I'll discuss motives for each team in the analysis.

 

AFC East

 

Buffalo Bills

 

 

Top needs: LT, WR, OLB, CB, QB

 

 

Rd 1 (10) WR Michael Floyd

Rd 2 (41) OT Jonathan Martin

Rd 3 (71) LB Mychal Kendricks

 

 

Analysis: Not in order, but I've hit my top three needs if I'm Buffalo. There are front offices that have Floyd as the top wide receiver in the draft, so getting him at No. 10 is pretty fair, given I've had him at about that spot on my Big Board. Floyd is a big target who will pick up the route tree quickly and give Ryan Fitzpatrick a much-needed new option. Martin is a guy who once carried a solid first-round grade and could be a total steal at No. 41. Kendricks has immense physical talent and could be plugged in immediately, something the team did with Kelvin Sheppard last year.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

SOLD!!!!!!!! :thumbsup::beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper's 'Grade A' Draft:

Mel plays GM of every AFC team in picking Rounds 1-3 of the draft

 

When I do mock drafts, I'm not simply giving my opinion on where players will go. In fact, I disagree with some of the picks I'm putting down. But the mocks are based on a combination of where players are being valued across the league, how I feel those players are valued by individual teams, what the top needs for each team are, whether they value need over the best player available and so on. It's not an editorial. For this, I was asked, "What would you do if you were picking?" So I gave it a shot. I've listed what I see as the top needs for each team, and I've gone ahead and made the picks that fill needs based on where I have players ranked. A few ground rules:

 

1. At each spot, I'm making the pick best for that team at that spot. I won't pass on an ideal pick for the Bills at No. 10 just because that player would be a great fit at No. 11.

2. There are no duplicates anywhere.

3. I will suggest good spots to trade down, but I won't rearrange the board.

4. This is for fun! One pick can derail a whole draft, so in no way do I think this is how it might look.

 

With that in mind, let's go through it. I'll discuss motives for each team in the analysis.

 

AFC East

 

Buffalo Bills

 

 

Top needs: LT, WR, OLB, CB, QB

 

 

Rd 1 (10) WR Michael Floyd

Rd 2 (41) OT Jonathan Martin

Rd 3 (71) LB Mychal Kendricks

 

 

Analysis: Not in order, but I've hit my top three needs if I'm Buffalo. There are front offices that have Floyd as the top wide receiver in the draft, so getting him at No. 10 is pretty fair, given I've had him at about that spot on my Big Board. Floyd is a big target who will pick up the route tree quickly and give Ryan Fitzpatrick a much-needed new option. Martin is a guy who once carried a solid first-round grade and could be a total steal at No. 41. Kendricks has immense physical talent and could be plugged in immediately, something the team did with Kelvin Sheppard last year.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way that the Bills would get so lucky! I wish. :worthy:

This is concievable given that the OLT position beyond Kalil is questionable, with real question being will Floyd fall to us at 10? I'm afraid he will be gone by then. Also if we are being greedy I would rather have Glen at 2 then Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or a cracked pipe dream.

 

Floyd certainly could happen and Kendricks could happen but Jonothan Martin slipping to the 41st pick would defy recent history since he is a LT and that is the most drafted position in the first round. I woulod take two out of the three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...