NastyMan Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I like Jeff Fuller as a WR better then Micheal Floyd. Fuller is bigger and just as productive, maybe even more productive if it wasn't for him being hurt in the beginning of last year. He's got football in him (i.e. Leslie Fuller S played 6 years for the 49ers). And Fuller (6'4" 220) is bigger then Floyd (6'2" 220). Plus if we drop the Floyd talk we can work on another position of need i.e. LB or OT with the first pick and get Fuller in round 3 or 4 (probably 4). JMO.
Nanker Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 Who? Draftek's Ranked 244th best player available, THAT'S who. Apparently the OP knows his football like nobody's fool.
sharebear Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 Yeah iv never heard of him.. and after just watching tape on him no thanks id still rather have floyd.. seems like the only time this guy is open is on out routes going out of bounds
NoSaint Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 Are you arguing youd rather have (insert 1st pick... Reiff, Glenn, Kirkpatrick) and fuller over Floyd and a round 3 LT/cb Or are you arguing that fuller will actually be a better player?
sharebear Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I think hes saying a better player.. but I don't see how he comes to that conclusion
BuckeyeBill Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I bet you the person who said Anquan Boldin and Marques Colston would be stud receivers before their respective drafts would have been laughed at as well.
NoSaint Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I bet you the person who said Anquan Boldin and Marques Colston would be stud receivers before their respective drafts would have been laughed at as well. Yea so is the guy buying lottery tickets for retirement savings. Occasionally you get it right by dumb luck.
Thirty Year Fan Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I like Jeff Fuller as a WR better then Micheal Floyd. Fuller is bigger and just as productive, maybe even more productive if it wasn't for him being hurt in the beginning of last year. He's got football in him (i.e. Leslie Fuller S played 6 years for the 49ers). And Fuller (6'4" 220) is bigger then Floyd (6'2" 220). Plus if we drop the Floyd talk we can work on another position of need i.e. LB or OT with the first pick and get Fuller in round 3 or 4 (probably 4). JMO. Put down the crack pipe please.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I like Jeff Fuller as a WR better then Micheal Floyd. Fuller is bigger and just as productive, maybe even more productive if it wasn't for him being hurt in the beginning of last year. He's got football in him (i.e. Leslie Fuller S played 6 years for the 49ers). And Fuller (6'4" 220) is bigger then Floyd (6'2" 220). Plus if we drop the Floyd talk we can work on another position of need i.e. LB or OT with the first pick and get Fuller in round 3 or 4 (probably 4). JMO. With all the A&M games I watched Fuller did not look great, dropped way to may balls and was inconsistent in his rout running. He had some injuries that could of set him back but just don't see him as better than Floyd ( wish Swope was coming out, that kid is a bigger version of Welker)
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 (edited) Got to catch the ball. Doesnt matter how big or fast you are if you cant catch. Edited April 14, 2012 by TheTruthHurts
BuffaloBillsSD Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 Did Damond Talbot open a new account? Well played.
NewEra Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 I'd love to grab fuller, but I don't think nearly as good as Floyd. I'd be happy if we drafted both of them
GOBILLS78 Posted April 14, 2012 Posted April 14, 2012 Did Damond Talbot open a new account? See, now that is a good comment.
Recommended Posts