Dave_In_Norfolk Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 This is rich! He wants people to stop blaming him for his tax cuts. When will the left take responsibility for these tax cuts? http://abcnews.go.com/politics/t/blogEntry?id=16108722 I wish they weren’t called the ‘Bush tax cuts’,”
KD in CA Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Blaming?? Why on earth would anyone 'blame' Bush for making a sound decision to let people keep more of their own money? Unless of course they were a complete moron and/or a freeloading POS (like you). p.s. and why didn't The Messiah raise taxes as soon as he took office?
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 Blaming?? Why on earth would anyone 'blame' Bush for making a sound decision to let people keep more of their own money? Unless of course they were a complete moron and/or a freeloading POS (like you). p.s. and why didn't The Messiah raise taxes as soon as he took office? Busting the budget is a sound decision? You are a complete idiot!
meazza Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Busting the budget is a sound decision? You are a complete idiot! What about 1+ Trillion in deficits for 3 years?
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 What about 1+ Trillion in deficits for 3 years? Recession? You know about that, right? I mean really? How many of you idiots are there on this board? Drop dead stupid
meazza Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Recession? You know about that, right? I mean really? How many of you idiots are there on this board? Drop dead stupid Recession was in 2008. We're in a mega recovery now remember?
Doc Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Blaming?? Why on earth would anyone 'blame' Bush for making a sound decision to let people keep more of their own money? Unless of course they were a complete moron and/or a freeloading POS (like you). p.s. and why didn't The Messiah raise taxes as soon as he took office? Not only that, why did he extend the tax cuts in 2010? Was he "for them, before he was against them?" I can't wait for the debates between Romney and Barry. Barry won't have his teleprompter to fall back on.
B-Man Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 This is rich! He wants people to stop blaming him for his tax cuts. When will the left take responsibility for these tax cuts? http://abcnews.go.com/politics/t/blogEntry?id=16108722 I wish they weren’t called the ‘Bush tax cuts’,” A sadder post than usual by davey. President Bush opines that if the tax relief bill he passed wasn't referred to by his name, then perhaps it would be easier to extend them. No blame No regret that it was passed No criticism of the current administration. Mr. Bush continues be all class, Dave in Norfolk to be all ass. .
Chef Jim Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 This is rich! He wants people to stop blaming him for his tax cuts. When will the left take responsibility for these tax cuts? http://abcnews.go.co...try?id=16108722 I wish they weren't called the 'Bush tax cuts'," Do you know what raising the cap gains taxes on people making over $1 million a year is going to do to dividend paying stocks?
/dev/null Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Recession was in 2008. We're in a mega recovery now remember? Not only have we had a mega recession, along the way we also went thru Green Shoots®, Summer of Recovery®, and Summer of Recovery 2.0® Happy days are here again The skies above are clear again So let's sing a song of cheer again Happy days are here again
Nanker Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Well, then there was 2 And, the Stock Market is doing great... wait, what do you mean no one's buying? And, unemployment is down... wait, what do you mean there are more people out of work now?
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 the markets have regained most of what was lost during the dying days of Bush's term - the nosedive from 14K to 6K. Now hovering 13K - the loss the last 2 days were based on "fears" of foreign markets. the unemployment rate is 8.3 % which uses the same fuzzy math used during the BA. back in 2002 the first Bush depression it took me 2 years to find a decent paying job in my field. How much different is that to what people are facing now? Not much.
/dev/null Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 the markets have regained most of what was lost during the dying days of Bush's term - the nosedive from 14K to 6K. Now hovering 13K - the loss the last 2 days were based on "fears" of foreign markets. So is that 13k based on 2008 or todays devalued dollar? Amazing what banks will do with interest free money isn't it? the unemployment rate is 8.3 % which uses the same fuzzy math used during the BA. Does that make it any less inaccurate? back in 2002 the first Bush depression it took me 2 years to find a decent paying job in my field. How much different is that to what people are facing now? Not much. Damn those Bushes for keeping you down!
IDBillzFan Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Now hovering 13K - I look forward to the media reports in the near term: "Dow Shoots Past 13K!!!*" *"Fifth time this year."
Doc Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 the markets have regained most of what was lost during the dying days of Bush's term - the nosedive from 14K to 6K. Now hovering 13K - the loss the last 2 days were based on "fears" of foreign markets. the unemployment rate is 8.3 % which uses the same fuzzy math used during the BA. back in 2002 the first Bush depression it took me 2 years to find a decent paying job in my field. How much different is that to what people are facing now? Not much. Well, for starters, there has been no 9/11 type event preceding this depression/recession/downturn since, well, 9/11/01. As for finding jobs, they're not coming back any faster than 2 years. Forget the unemployment rate, look at the "not in the work force" numbers. There is no fuzzy math there.
DC Tom Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Well, for starters, there has been no 9/11 type event preceding this depression/recession/downturn since, well, 9/11/01. As for finding jobs, they're not coming back any faster than 2 years. Forget the unemployment rate, look at the "not in the work force" numbers. There is no fuzzy math there. No fuzzy math except for the "jobless recovery" under Bush with unemployment at 6%, vice the stellar job creation under Obama with unemployment in the mid-8's.
Doc Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 No fuzzy math except for the "jobless recovery" under Bush with unemployment at 6%, vice the stellar job creation under Obama with unemployment in the mid-8's. I meant there is no fuzzy math with the "not in the work force" numbers.
TPS Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Well, for starters, there has been no 9/11 type event preceding this depression/recession/downturn since, well, 9/11/01. As for finding jobs, they're not coming back any faster than 2 years. Forget the unemployment rate, look at the "not in the work force" numbers. There is no fuzzy math there. If you are referring to the labor force participation rate, then you need to be careful about interpreting a decline as a negative. The rate is expected to steadily decline over the next 15-20 years as the babyboom generation retires. There will be more people leaving the workforce than new entrants.
Magox Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 If you are referring to the labor force participation rate, then you need to be careful about interpreting a decline as a negative. The rate is expected to steadily decline over the next 15-20 years as the babyboom generation retires. There will be more people leaving the workforce than new entrants. Except that, that isnt the cause for the rapid precipitous decline in the labor partipation rate over the past few years.
TPS Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Except that, that isnt the cause for the rapid precipitous decline in the labor partipation rate over the past few years. Don't disagree that a big part has been people dropping out, but some of it is the demographic change.
Recommended Posts