3rdnlng Posted April 12, 2012 Author Posted April 12, 2012 LA, 3rdning, OC...sorry. Sincerely. You mean I shouldn't have said whatever I said in the other thread? Cramping gone?
Buftex Posted April 12, 2012 Posted April 12, 2012 Never admit you're wrong on PPP. It's a sign of weakness. And we absolutely thrive on slaughtering the weak. Not admitting I am wrong about anything, other than to get personal with those three gentlemen. There really is no use, and it never changes anything.
DC Tom Posted April 12, 2012 Posted April 12, 2012 Not admitting I am wrong about anything, other than to get personal with those three gentlemen. There really is no use, and it never changes anything. 3rd, a gentleman? Yeah, and I'm humble.
3rdnlng Posted April 12, 2012 Author Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) Not admitting I am wrong about anything, other than to get personal with those three gentlemen. There really is no use, and it never changes anything. You need to lighten up. 3rd, a gentleman? Yeah, and I'm humble. Don't get carried away with your analogies. Edited April 12, 2012 by 3rdnlng
OCinBuffalo Posted April 12, 2012 Posted April 12, 2012 Let me restate that for you: Obama has all the qualities of me on this board. How do you !@#$wits feel about me? Would you vote for me? No? Then why on earth would you vote for Obama? I dunno. I'd probably vote for you, given the choices we usually get. However, that would be on the condition that you hired Dana Perino to de-Newt you every 2 days. LA, 3rdning, OC...sorry. Sincerely. Np. Now, tell me how you the TEA party figures it doesn't get a governing guy in Romney, who won't kill off the spending they hate? Why on earth would the TEA party do anything other than fully, vocally, support Romney, when you consider the alternative? They don't care about social stuff. Or, at least I've never heard a TEA party "organizer", as they don't have a leader, talk about it much. Right now: it's highly likely that the House and Senate are Republican. IF Romney wins, do you think that we will see spending increases like we had when Bush had both houses? I could be wrong, but I think Republicans have gotten the TEA party message, and, Ryan has made it OK to talk about SSI...so...what? Never admit you're wrong on PPP. It's a sign of weakness. And we absolutely thrive on slaughtering the weak. Yes. I bet this is the primary reason for the liberal exodus....not many of them have Buftex thick skin, or Buftex honor.
Koko78 Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Let me restate that for you: Obama has all the qualities of me on this board. How do you !@#$wits feel about me? Would you vote for me? No? Then why on earth would you vote for Obama? Depends, what kind of Bob the Builder-inspired campaign slogans does your campaign plan to use? What's your plan to deal with idiots, cretins, morons and !@#$ing idiots?
DC Tom Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Depends, what kind of Bob the Builder-inspired campaign slogans does your campaign plan to use? "Hookers and Blow". It's as catchy as "Hope and Change," but is ultimately based on a measurable economic metric. What's your plan to deal with idiots, cretins, morons and !@#$ing idiots? Weaker gun control laws combined with a tax credit for all firearms purchases. And free Skittles and hoodies for everyone.
3rdnlng Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 "Hookers and Blow". It's as catchy as "Hope and Change," but is ultimately based on a measurable economic metric. Weaker gun control laws combined with a tax credit for all firearms purchases. And free Skittles and hoodies for everyone. Could you extend the tax credits to the "Hookers and Blow"? If so, I might be able to support you. If free samples were given out by your campaign I might be able to support you even more. In fact, I could probably guarantee you New Jersey, Illinois and the urban areas of Nevada.
Chef Jim Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Wah, wah, whah... I have no interest in participating in it. But yet you continue to participate.
Recommended Posts