ieatcrayonz Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 All I'm saying is that if you provide hundreds of internet links supporting your argument, then your argument must be true. You disagree? Oh no! You should have stuck with the chain email idea. How's it going Red? Yo Baldy. Long time no talk. Anyway, when we last left off you wanted me to talk to the big man: Link As I mention at the bottom, he allows one GvG follow up question. I might have missed it but do you have one?
Jauronimo Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 You mean like hang out on this board and regurgitate "ideology" that you get from MSN? Yeah, your life is apparently awesome. Well he does have a negative effective tax rate, which is pretty awesome.
3rdnlng Posted March 28, 2012 Author Posted March 28, 2012 Ok, what would you like to know? You sure as hell haven't read all those have you? If you did you should be ashamed of yourself for posting them since some of the ones I read are completely full of ****. I'd like you to explain global warming like you said you would. I started this thread just for you, after you requested it.
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 All I'm saying is that if you provide hundreds of internet links supporting your argument, then your argument must be true. You disagree? And all I'm saying is you have to watch your grammar. "Is everyone convinced, or is it just me?" No, it's just you.
GG Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 As I mention at the bottom, he allows one GvG follow up question. I might have missed it but do you have one? Hey, copyright infringement. That's $0.02 to Cap'n McGillicudy
Rob's House Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Ok, what would you like to know? We were hoping you might be able to explain to us the science that proves the theory of man-made global warming.
Gene Frenkle Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Yo Baldy. Long time no talk. Anyway, when we last left off you wanted me to talk to the big man: Link As I mention at the bottom, he allows one GvG follow up question. I might have missed it but do you have one? Sup hariball? I've got to re-read His holy response when I get a few minutes...
drnykterstein Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 All of your posts are so silly. This is the most unscientific discussion ever. A very silly thing when you are all supposed to be discussing a scientific topic. This is probably not a complete list of how ridiculous you all are. erynthered is using argument from silence and Ad hominem attacks Alaska Darin has used Judgmental language, appeal to ridicule, Appeal to spite DC Tom used the Continuum fallacy and Appeal to ridicule 3rdnlng used Appeal to ridicule Bigfatbillsfan used Appeal to spite
Jauronimo Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 (edited) All of your posts are so silly. This is the most unscientific discussion ever. A very silly thing when you are all supposed to be discussing a scientific topic. This is probably not a complete list of how ridiculous you all are. erynthered is using argument from silence and Ad hominem attacks Alaska Darin has used Judgmental language, appeal to ridicule, Appeal to spite DC Tom used the Continuum fallacy and Appeal to ridicule 3rdnlng used Appeal to ridicule Bigfatbillsfan used Appeal to spite Thank you, Conner. Can we please get back to discussing the hard science and facts surrounding climate shift as introduced by Conner in the post below? Still waiting for you to collect your Nobel Prize for disproving global warming. We all know you could be a famous man, but instead you sacrifice fame and fortune and spend your time educating1 our feeble minds. We on TBD/PPP appreciate that you give so much of yourself for us. 1. Read: miseducate I can see why you're a legend at PPP. Why don't you look up irony on wikipedia while you're at it. Edited March 28, 2012 by Jauronimo
B-Man Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 All of your posts are so silly. This is the most unscientific discussion ever. A very silly thing when you are all supposed to be discussing a scientific topic. This is probably not a complete list of how ridiculous you all are. erynthered is using argument from silence and Ad hominem attacks Alaska Darin has used Judgmental language, appeal to ridicule, Appeal to spite DC Tom used the Continuum fallacy and Appeal to ridicule 3rdnlng used Appeal to ridicule Bigfatbillsfan used Appeal to spite Wow, I guess the rumors were true................................ Well, put me down for this then, B-Man has discovered that conner is a self-centered resident of the Tool Academy....................lol .
GG Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Thank you, Conner. Can we please get back to discussing the hard science and facts surrounding climate shift as introduced by Conner in the post below? I can see why you're a legend at PPP. Why don't you look up irony on wikipedia while you're at it. You probably should use a different term. He probably interpreted "legend" as a compliment.
KD in CA Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Well he does have a negative effective tax rate, which is pretty awesome. ....and feels that others aren't paying their "fair share" in taxes.
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 All of your posts are so silly. This is the most unscientific discussion ever. A very silly thing when you are all supposed to be discussing a scientific topic. This is probably not a complete list of how ridiculous you all are. erynthered is using argument from silence and Ad hominem attacks Alaska Darin has used Judgmental language, appeal to ridicule, Appeal to spite DC Tom used the Continuum fallacy and Appeal to ridicule 3rdnlng used Appeal to ridicule Bigfatbillsfan used Appeal to spite We're not discussing a scientific topic, you unholy moron. We're mocking other posters outright. I'm not making an appeal to ridicule...I'm ridiculing. And "continuum fallacy"? The only fallacy here is you pretending you know what the "continuum fallacy" is.
/dev/null Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 I can see why you're a legend at PPP. You probably should use a different term. He probably interpreted "legend" as a compliment. Wow, I guess the rumors were true................................ The transplants from that other board have finally been graced with a connerific thread The Man The Myth The Moron
Nanker Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 The transplants from that other board have finally been graced with a connerific thread The Man The Myth The Moron Can a YouTube Bill Nye link be far away?
ieatcrayonz Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Hey, copyright infringement. That's $0.02 to Cap'n McGillicudy I don't get it.
3rdnlng Posted March 28, 2012 Author Posted March 28, 2012 All of your posts are so silly. This is the most unscientific discussion ever. A very silly thing when you are all supposed to be discussing a scientific topic. This is probably not a complete list of how ridiculous you all are. erynthered is using argument from silence and Ad hominem attacks Alaska Darin has used Judgmental language, appeal to ridicule, Appeal to spite DC Tom used the Continuum fallacy and Appeal to ridicule 3rdnlng used Appeal to ridicule Bigfatbillsfan used Appeal to spite What part of me asking BFBF to explain global warming is not sincere? He asked in another thread why someone didn't post a thread about global warming so he could explain it to us. When you are late to the party you can't complain that all the good seats are taken. Thanks for jumping in though. The refugees from the other board couldn' believe that we once had someone more stupid than DiN.
drnykterstein Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Thank you, Conner. Can we please get back to discussing the hard science and facts surrounding climate shift as introduced by Conner in the post below? I can see why you're a legend at PPP. Why don't you look up irony on wikipedia while you're at it. If you really wanted to be the top-hat and monocle of the group then you should point out that I'm ridiculing people in the exact same post where I tell them that ridiculing should not be done.
Jauronimo Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 (edited) If you really wanted to be the top-hat and monocle of the group then you should point out that I'm ridiculing people in the exact same post where I tell them that ridiculing should not be done. Like I said, look up irony. Not sure how its possible, but it appears that I've over-estimated you. Sorry DiN, you try but Conner is just too damn good. Edited March 28, 2012 by Jauronimo
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Like I said, look up irony. Not sure how its possible, but it appears that I've over-estimated you. Sorry DiN, you try but Conner is just too damn good. The difference between DiN and Conner is the difference between a monkey that throws his **** at the wall and a monkey that smears his **** on the wall and calls it artwork.
Recommended Posts