Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No reason to think a military research lab would consider using a "fire-fighting" robot for any other purpose:

 

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/09/robosoldiers-hi/#previouspost

 

James Canton, chief executive officer of the Institute for Global Futures and an expert on military technologies, said SWORDS is a relatively simple machine and just the cusp of where the military is going with robots. The coming robot army will change the military world both tactically and strategically, he predicted.

 

These first SWORDS ‘bots are fairly primitive, but the users seems to like them. And faster and more agile machines giving the user a better situational awareness are not far away. As with many weapons systems from biplanes to UAVs, what we see here is a machine originally meant for other purposes with a weapon bolted on. But if it works, I predict the v2.0 will have armor, additional weapon options and a whole range of other kit built into it.

 

When the Navy starts arming their hydrogen-powered robotic jellyfish, don't say you weren't warned!

 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-57401801-42/robojelly-hydrogen-powered-robot-jellyfish-is-squishy-awesome/?tag=mncol;txt

Posted

No reason to think a military research lab would consider using a "fire-fighting" robot for any other purpose:

 

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/09/robosoldiers-hi/#previouspost

 

 

 

When the Navy starts arming their hydrogen-powered robotic jellyfish, don't say you weren't warned!

 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-57401801-42/robojelly-hydrogen-powered-robot-jellyfish-is-squishy-awesome/?tag=mncol;txt

 

They already have combat robots. B word about those instead. :rolleyes:

×
×
  • Create New...