3rdnlng Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Afghanistan-Karzai-Americans-demons/2012/03/21/id/433368?s=al&promo_code=E7BE-1 We've been there for a decade and the Afghan government can't stand on its own feet. We went in because the Taliban government was harboring terorists that attacked us numerous times, most notably on 9-11. Now their president is calling our troops "demons". After all of our blood that was spilled he treats us like this? He also wants to dictate our deployment in-country. Let's say we leave and the place just returns to harboring terrorists that eventually attack our country. What would be our response? What options would we have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 http://www.newsmax.c...omo_code=E7BE-1 We've been there for a decade and the Afghan government can't stand on its own feet. We went in because the Taliban government was harboring terorists that attacked us numerous times, most notably on 9-11. Now their president is calling our troops "demons". After all of our blood that was spilled he treats us like this? He also wants to dictate our deployment in-country. Let's say we leave and the place just returns to harboring terrorists that eventually attack our country. What would be our response? What options would we have? Another liberal program that was destined to fail. It's tough to nation build when you're !@#$ing up so badly at home. It's time to admit that wars need to be about total conquest or short term message sending with no in between. This could have been over a very long time ago with "leisure" bombing from Whiteman if anything even remotely serious started up. The U.S. Army is ill-equipped to handle engagements like this and the current version of public information warfare is virtually impossible to control because every tiny issue is so easily blown up. Pull out. Warn sternly. Follow up if necessary. If we don't have the apparatus in place to monitor Afghanistan, then we never will. Oh, and once again a big thanks to the Clinton Administration for the Executive Order on asset recruitment. One of the all-time !@#$ ups in Presidential history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 What do you expect with libs like Obama and Panetta running the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 What do you expect with libs like Obama and Panetta running the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Afghanistan-Karzai-Americans-demons/2012/03/21/id/433368?s=al&promo_code=E7BE-1 We've been there for a decade and the Afghan government can't stand on its own feet. We went in because the Taliban government was harboring terorists that attacked us numerous times, most notably on 9-11. Now their president is calling our troops "demons". After all of our blood that was spilled he treats us like this? He also wants to dictate our deployment in-country. Let's say we leave and the place just returns to harboring terrorists that eventually attack our country. What would be our response? What options would we have? He needs to be somewhat less than discretely reminded that the presence of those "demons" are the only thing that is keeping him in power. Apparently the lessons of Vietnam were forgotten. Politically-limited warfare while respecting territorial boundaries when the enemy does not DOES NOT WORK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 I'll never forget the day Obama and Panetta started two losing wars with no clear goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 21, 2012 Author Share Posted March 21, 2012 (edited) He needs to be somewhat less than discretely reminded that the presence of those "demons" are the only thing that is keeping him in power. Apparently the lessons of Vietnam were forgotten. Politically-limited warfare while respecting territorial boundaries when the enemy does not DOES NOT WORK. So, if we get attacked here on our soil again by terrorists harbored and/or trained in Afghanistan, when we no longer have a presence there, what should we do? Edited March 21, 2012 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 So, if we get attacked here on our soil again by terrorists harbored and/or trained in Afghanistan, when we no longer have a presence there, what should we do? I've always been a big fan of bombing them into oblivion. Not really the popular way to wage war these days, but hey, I'm old school like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 So, if we get attacked here on our soil again by terrorists harbored and/or trained in Afghanistan, when we no longer have a presence there, what should we do? Stand outside on the steps of the capitol and sing "God Bless America." Look, it's not going to happen, okay? The current administration's Sally Fields Foreign Policy plan is working like a charm. People like us again. No one wants to attack us any more. Hell, just the other day Obama actually tucked David Cameron into bed. Really. We're loved now. No one will hurt us. Unless, y'know, you put one of those evil Republican warmongers in charge. Then all bets are off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 He needs to be somewhat less than discretely reminded that the presence of those "demons" are the only thing that is keeping him in power. I'll see that "in power" and raise you an "alive." Because at this point, two to three days after we're out of there, Karzai gets slowly beheaded with a dull machete. Which, with his attitude (particularly after the OBL raid when he said that if the U.S. and Pakistan went to war, he'd side with Pakistan), I am actually in favor of. When his head is being placed next to his belly, ask him who the demons are. But be quick about it. And what with not having a windpipe, have him blink once for one option, and twice for another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 21, 2012 Author Share Posted March 21, 2012 I've always been a big fan of bombing them into oblivion. Not really the popular way to wage war these days, but hey, I'm old school like that. I presume you aren't being serious, so what would you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 I'll never forget the day Obama and Panetta started two losing wars with no clear goals. Hey, only one of the wars had no clear goal. And only the other one was a losing proposition. I've always been a big fan of bombing them into oblivion. Not really the popular way to wage war these days, but hey, I'm old school like that. Bombing Afghanistan into oblivion would be redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Bombing Afghanistan into oblivion would be redundant. Stone age would work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Stone age would work. Again, redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Again, redundant. Not entirely. The Afghanis do have domesticated animals, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Not entirely. The Afghanis do have domesticated animals, at least. Weren't dogs started being domesticated in the stone age? I'm guessing the affinity for sheep hasn't changed there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 (edited) I'm guessing the affinity for sheep hasn't changed there. Has it changed here? Oh wait no, that was a goat. Edited March 22, 2012 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Has it changed here? Oh wait no, that was a goat. An a-hole's true best friend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 An a-hole's true best friend? Absolutely. After making sweet love you season it with curry and slap in on a spit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Absolutely. After making sweet love you season it with curry and slap in on a spit. Odd. I didn't even know sheeps had a spit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts