B-Man Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Obama said Trayvon Martin's death particularly resonated with him as an African-American parent. "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Obama said in brief remarks outside the White House. I do not think it is wise for the president to further inject race into the incident It certainly does not help the situation itself, but it's wise for Barack. And as you know, this tragedy is all about Barack..................... Just ask him. Everything is. .
IDBillzFan Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Everything is. Well, everything but Solyndra. And our debt. And deficit. And economy. And unemployment. And this lamp.
GG Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Well, everything but Solyndra. And our debt. And deficit. And economy. And unemployment. And this lamp. But definitely not the ashtray.
Adam Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 For the people complaining about the "Stand your ground" law not being perfect......of course it isn't. What law accounts for every possible situation. Sure, maybe it can be tweaked to be better, but if the law required retreat, it could put innocent people even more in harms way. We live in a violent world, it would be nice not to need guns and laws like this, but innocent people need to defend themselves. That said, whatever happened in this case is absolutely tragic. The evidence presented, although seems handpicked, points at this not being self defense.
3rdnlng Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 (edited) I do not think it is wise for the president to further inject race into the incident It certainly does not help the situation itself, but it's wise for Barack. And as you know, this tragedy is all about Barack..................... Just ask him. Everything is. . Just saw on the news that prior to the question to Obama regarding Trayvon a member of the administration went over to the reporter that asked the question and whispered in his ear. Con Artist in Chief. Edited March 23, 2012 by 3rdnlng
fjl2nd Posted March 23, 2012 Author Posted March 23, 2012 !@#$ Al Sharpon. !@#$ the media who LOVES these stories and stokes the flames to sell papers. !@#$ Jesse Jackson. !@#$ Obama for sticking his nose in the situation AGAIN. !@#$ white guilt-ridden !@#$s who feel the need to pat black people on the head to show how "not racist" they are. !@#$ black people for getting all "outraged" over this while stepping over the bodies on their own sidewalks littered with bullet holes put in them by other black people, !@#$ Eric Holder that incompetent shitbag for getting involved in this, but ignoring worse criminal cases and !@#$ lybob and other liberal !@#$s just on general principal. This is just sad. I feel bad for you man.
IDBillzFan Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 This is just sad. I feel bad for you man. Why do you feel badly for him?
Adam Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Why do you feel badly for him? The repeated use of !@#$ is enough reason for me.......
IDBillzFan Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 The repeated use of !@#$ is enough reason for me....... That's because you live in a bubble.
Dante Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 (edited) There seems to such universal outrage over this thing. Just wondering where the main stream and social media was when all the flash mobbing by blacks was going on against whites? Like the Wisconsin Fair thing? Had to read about that on the internet. Edited March 23, 2012 by Dante
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxPR8NVvgEU That's because you live in a bubble. The bubble isn't all what it is cracked up to be either... Wasn't Martin shot in a gated community? How much more of a bubble can you get? Then there is the Dirty Bubble: The Dirty Bubble Watch out for that uneven surface tension!
IDBillzFan Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 There seems to such universal outrage over this thing. Just wondering where the main stream and social media was when all the flash mobbing by blacks was going on against whites? Like the Wisconsin Fair thing? Had to read about that on the internet. I just saw this story for the first time today. You'd think two black teens setting a white teen on fire because he's white would get some play. Maybe someone will ask the president what he thinks of this story.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 I just saw this story for the first time today. You'd think two black teens setting a white teen on fire because he's white would get some play. Maybe someone will ask the president what he thinks of this story. I read about that a few weeks ago... Pretty sad! Did they catch the perps? I would hope they would least investigate right after they get the perps. The thing abou this story is that they didn't even bring in Zimmerman... They knew where he was. Why give the dead body a drug test and not the guy doing the shooting. The police chief stepped down with a vote of no confidence. What is bothering people (I know me) is how the events AFTER the incident has been playing out.
3rdnlng Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 (edited) I read about that a few weeks ago... Pretty sad! Did they catch the perps? I would hope they would least investigate right after they get the perps. The thing abou this story is that they didn't even bring in Zimmerman... They knew where he was. Why give the dead body a drug test and not the guy doing the shooting. The police chief stepped down with a vote of no confidence. What is bothering people (I know me) is how the events AFTER the incident has been playing out. Yes they did bring in Zimmerman for an interview. I'm hearing that witnesses claim they saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman while they were both on the ground with Trayvon punching him in the face. Zimmerman had lacerations to his face and the back of his head plus grass stains on his back. So, why don't we sit back and let the Grand Jury do its job? Edited March 23, 2012 by 3rdnlng
erynthered Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Yes they did bring in Zimmerman for an interview. I'm hearing that witnesses claim they saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman while they were both on the ground with Trayvon punching him in the face. Zimmerman had lacerations to his face and the back of his head plus grass stains on his back. So, why don't we sit back and let the Grand Jury do its job? ^^^This. Local talk radio's been saying the same thing. Bloody nose Cuts on his face The back of his jacket had grass stains and was wet. Sounds like he was getting his ass kicked. Still, he should have listened to the directions of the dispatcher.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Yes they did bring in Zimmerman for an interview. I'm hearing that witnesses claim they saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman while they were both on the ground with Trayvon punching him in the face. Zimmerman had lacerations to his face and the back of his head plus grass stains on his back. So, why don't we sit back and let the Grand Jury do its job? Where is self-defense here?... Seems like Trayvon was acting in self-defense... Zimmerman was ordered not to pursue Martin. By pursuing, Zimmerman invoked an attack... Should Trayvon "stand his ground"... Why should he have to retreat... Zimmerman was the original attacker for following him. This is a charging foul by Zimmerman. Martin stood his ground. Would you stand there and wait to get shot? Sure Martin did get shot in the end... But if you say what is true... He at least went down with a fight!
3rdnlng Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 ^^^This. Local talk radio's been saying the same thing. Bloody nose Cuts on his face The back of his jacket had grass stains and was wet. Sounds like he was getting his ass kicked. Still, he should have listened to the directions of the dispatcher. Don't get me wrong, I'm not in any way saying he isn't guilty. I just think Judge Al Sharpton shouldn't be trying him. What happens if the Grand Jury fails to hold him over for trial?
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 The standard is being applied wrong because Martin is dead. Zimmerman was the attacker... He followed him... He is the aggressor... Simple. Martin acted in self-defense. Again... The bad thing... Martin lost, he is dead... His voice in the investigation has been lost and that voice default to Zimmerman wrongly.
meazza Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 The standard is being applied wrong because Martin is dead. Zimmerman was the attacker... He followed him... He is the aggressor... Simple. Martin acted in self-defense. Again... The bad thing... Martin lost, he is dead... His voice in the investigation has been lost and that voice default to Zimmerman wrongly. I didn't realize you examined all the evidence?
Alaska Darin Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 The standard is being applied wrong because Martin is dead. Zimmerman was the attacker... He followed him... He is the aggressor... Simple. Martin acted in self-defense. Again... The bad thing... Martin lost, he is dead... His voice in the investigation has been lost and that voice default to Zimmerman wrongly. Thank you, eye witness. Sincerely, M. Nifong
Recommended Posts