bbb Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 that was john guy, for the record. That's where he ended up after we fired him?!?
3rdnlng Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 (edited) That's where he ended up after we fired him?!? Yes, on top of "Squeezable Sue" in front of a judge and jury. Edited July 11, 2013 by 3rdnlng
bbb Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Dave @observation_dek 3m Love it!!!! Mark Geragos just referred ON CNN to the "Hysterical Ladies Network" - HLN. #NancyGrace #JaneVelez-Mitchell #TheirGuests Yes, on top of "Squeezable Sue" in front of a judge and jury. LOL - how the mighty have fallen!
B-Man Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Ex-Sanford police chief: Zimmerman probe 'taken away from us' (CNN) -- The George Zimmerman investigation was hijacked "in a number of ways" by outside forces, said the former police chief of Sanford, Florida. Bill Lee, who testified Monday in Zimmerman's second-degree murder trial, told CNN's George Howell in an exclusive interview that he felt pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice. "It was (relayed) to me that they just wanted an arrest. They didn't care if it got dismissed later," he said. "You don't do that." http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive/index.html .
boyst Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 http://edition.cnn.c...sive/index.html of all people...CNN puts him on a pedestal?
Just Jack Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 You can protest the verdict, but don't riot asks the Sheriff Dept... article - http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/07/florida-police-kindly-ask-you-dont-riot-when-zimmerman-trial-ends/67025/ press release - http://www.sheriff.o...46-a3a4ca5438d3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AN_siaEpQA
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Actually the more I peruse this thread the more I have to bow to the expertise on racism here. Because outside of a KKK rally it's hard to imagine seeing so much concentrated racism in one place. Wowza. Well done. I guess. Today I learned that the definition of racism has been expanded to include "showing insufficient willingness to disregard the rule of law and the fundamental underpinnings of American jurisprudance in favor of appeasing the self-serving desires of professional race-baiters".
Donald Duck Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 (edited) It's like clockwork. They come down, say something stupid, maybe wash and repeat and then run away for another few months. He/she/its comments about college freshman taking over the board will fit in nicely with the comments about all the old, white, bald racists here. It was a general statement that we are close to the KKK as far as racism goes. When challenged to submit some examples she runs away pulls them out of the woodwork. The reason I'm assuming that it is a female---no balls. all brains Anything that's said here matters not one whit in the grand scheme of things except to he who posted it and the people who take exception to it. . Edited July 11, 2013 by dog14787
reddogblitz Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 I would have said "person," myself. "Suspect" is biased. "Criminal element" was dog's words. "Suspect" was George Zimmerman's word. The reason I'm assuming that it is a female---no balls. Ah, sexism too, nice.
3rdnlng Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 "Suspect" was George Zimmerman's word. Ah, sexism too, nice. No, no balls. Bring something to the table, other than bs.
3rdnlng Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 (edited) Anything that's said here matters not one whit in the grand scheme of things except to he who posted it and the people who take exception to it. . You should give her credit for her own work rather than just plagiarizing it. It is ironic that you post it in direct conflict with its premise. Now explain to me what examples of racism here that she "pulled out of the woodwork". Go ahead, you altered my post to state that, now back it up. You really shouldn't have come down here and voiced your "opinions". You're as rudderless as BDLR and his team and incapable of forming an opinion on fact, let alone employ any critical thinking and intellectual curiosity. You're the kind of person that spends all his time talking rather than listening. Continue to spew your nonsense though, some here want the target practice. Edited July 11, 2013 by 3rdnlng
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 "Suspect" was George Zimmerman's word. I was demonstrating dog's idiocy, hence used his words.
meazza Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 I get that... Demonstrating DC Toms idiocy So far your demonstration has failed...
B-Man Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Lol.......Prosecution desperation continues this A.M. , the state's now arguing it's 3rd degree felony murder based on child abuse. Defense first notified this morning at 7:30 West:"Has State been gathering this case law for over a year, so could spring it on us, this Court, this jury, last moment?" (Big surprise) Judge Nelson says law permits state's child abuse argument, West calls it a "trick." ...............Judge: We'll revisit this later Judge: I can give u some time to prepare but not hours. We're skipping that for now & moving on. .
B-Man Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 (edited) Tweets following the flow of the lawyers argument on Jury instructions State & Nelson (but I repeat myself) arguing that Zimmerman can only claim self-defense if first prove attacker committing a felony. (?) The defense accused the state of pulling tricks again and the judge asked Don Wesr not to use the word "trick" any more West: Zimmerman doesn't want to argue that Trayvon was committing a felony when killed. He is stressing that GZ was resisting bodily harm. Defense worried about state using provocation in broad sense as defense to justifiable homicide and watering down self defense argument. Mantei: can argue use of force based on witness statements that Zimmerman started confrontation, GZ was on top of Trayvon The state just said the facts show an equal possibility that either Zimmerman or Martin was the aggressor. West pointing out obvious that there's NO EVIDENCE of Zimmerman accosting Martin Finally the provocation argument, provocation means physical force or violence- not following. The defense says Martin had almost 4 minutes to go 348 feet to get away from Zimmermanbut chose not to. West: "As a matter of law, following someone... is not against the law," especially if reporting info to police. Edited July 11, 2013 by B-Man
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Lol.......Prosecution desperation continues this A.M. , the state's now arguing it's 3rd degree felony murder based on child abuse. Defense first notified this morning at 7:30 West:"Has State been gathering this case law for over a year, so could spring it on us, this Court, this jury, last moment?" (Big surprise) Judge Nelson says law permits state's child abuse argument, West calls it a "trick." ...............Judge: We'll revisit this later Judge: I can give u some time to prepare but not hours. We're skipping that for now & moving on. . Florida doesn't HAVE a third-degree murder statute. "Child abuse" as a contributing factor in a death is still second degree felony murder.
NoSaint Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 Florida doesn't HAVE a third-degree murder statute. "Child abuse" as a contributing factor in a death is still second degree felony murder. interesting. seems like the prosecution decided to stay under the radar all trial and then really reach in the bag of tricks here
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 11, 2013 Posted July 11, 2013 interesting. seems like the prosecution decided to stay under the radar all trial and then really reach in the bag of tricks here "Don't call them tricks."
Recommended Posts