DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 OK, wait... You believe that all points of inquiry should report, retroactively, to if a crime had been commited before the inquiry about the commission of said possible crime? What kind of !@#$ed up and completely unworkable standard is that? Oooh, wait, I know this one. Because it's just his opinion, and he's trying to have a reasonable discussion, and you can't have a reasonable discussion because you refuse to accept that he's right and you're wrong.
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Oooh, wait, I know this one. Because it's just his opinion, and he's trying to have a reasonable discussion, and you can't have a reasonable discussion because you refuse to accept that he's right and you're wrong. you forgot name calling, idiot, we keep calling him names instead of actually discuss the facts of this case.
Chef Jim Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 none ( thats been proven) What law did Martin break before being shot? Is a drunk driver thats killed somebody breaking the law while hes drinking? No, he is not, but when he gets behind the wheel of a car his negligence sets forth a series of events that causes loss of life Zimmermans not a cop, hes a neghborhood watch, its not his job to track down and interigate , his job is to report suspicious activity to the proper authorities so this kind of thing doesn't happen Neighborhood watch is not a job.
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) They are dissecting the holstering of the gun before the shooting. Did Mr Martin go for the gun? Was it holstered? This is insane, he was not at all a witness. I also believe the state is almost proving it was self defense to save face and make the case look much better to present to the public since it is a sham anyway. Edited July 2, 2013 by jboyst62
3rdnlng Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) If a person continues with a false narrative after being shown it is false, is he not a liar? Dog, why do you continue to claim that a dispatcher told GZ not to get out of his vehicle when the tapes clearly back up the fact that GZ was already out of his vehicle when he was asked if he was following TM? What is the purpose of your lying? Why do you claim that GZ was out to interrogate TM? Why do you continue to lie about GZ following TM, when we know that TM was following GZ? Oh, and btw, why do my comments in this thread prevent other people from commenting? Edited July 2, 2013 by 3rdnlng
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 you forgot name calling, idiot, we keep calling him names instead of actually discuss the facts of this case. No, we keep calling him names WHILE actually discussing the facts of the case. We multitask. We're good that way.
TheMadCap Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Not to break up the patented, "right wing gang-bang" but I do find it interesting that if you only follow this case based on what major news sites have posted, you would think that the prosecution is wiping the floor with the defense...
Jauronimo Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Not to break up the patented, "right wing gang-bang" but I do find it interesting that if you only follow this case based on what major news sites have posted, you would think that the prosecution is wiping the floor with the defense... Ahhh, the patented "I'm above it all" cop-out. How novel.
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Ahhh, the patented "I'm above it all" cop-out. How novel. Anyone who's truly "above it all" doesn't need to call attention to it. Like how I never have to brag about being smarter than any two of you here...'cause it's just self-evident.
3rdnlng Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Anyone who's truly "above it all" doesn't need to call attention to it. Like how I never have to brag about being smarter than any two of you here...'cause it's just self-evident. What happens when you and TYTT get in the same room?
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 What happens when you and TYTT get in the same room? He eventually mentions nanothermite at the WTC, then I call him an idiot and ignore him.
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 He eventually mentions nanothermite at the WTC, then I call him an idiot and ignore him. You were painfully, and epicly trolled in that thread.
Nanker Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 No, I meant Zimmerman's hanging. You guys are going off on a tangent.
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 You were painfully, and epicly trolled in that thread. Only because the chemtrails were making my eyes water. Freak.
B-Man Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 The Court opened today with a request from Prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda, before the jury was present, to ask Judge Nelson to strike perhaps the most telling blow from yesterday’s testimony from former Investigator Chris Serino. BDLR argued that when O’Mara asked Serino if he believed Zimmerman to be telling the truth, Serino responded that he did, that such a testament of a law enforcement officer of a defendant was inappropriate and must be struck. He “ambushed” the defense with a detailed motion the State’s office had presumably spent much of the night preparing, and Judge Nelson required the defense to evaluate and respond to the motion while standing in court. O’Mara did the best he could under the circumstances, but Nelson elected to side with the State. When the jury was brought into the courtroom she played the audio of that part of O’Mara’s cross, and instructed the jury that the evidence was struck and not to be considered by them. Frankly, it seems to this observer is that all that was accomplished by this maneuver is that after hearing the statement as the last thing before being sequestered for the night and having a chance to sleep on it, the jury heard it again first thing in the morning to set the tone for the day ahead. It struck me as an odd maneuver, and odd timing... http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/zimmerman-update-exclusive-mid-day-7-serino-more-ambivalent-osterman-supports-self-defense/
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 No, I meant Zimmerman's hanging. You guys are going off on a tangent. I believe the lynching has been tenatively scheduled for two days and 4 hours post trial, after the nation-wide race riots have quite litterally burned themselves out, and there is nothing left to loot from urban store-fronts.
IDBillzFan Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Not to break up the patented, "right wing gang-bang" ... It's actually patent-pending, but I like your optimism. I really appreciate how seeing Zimmerman as someone who defended himself is "right wing" thinking and seeing Trayvon as a skittle-carrying pudgy-faced teen who was murdered in cold blood by a white hispanic for WWB in a GC is considered left-wing. I wonder how that happened. I wonder how the world became so divisive on this issue. It's really something of an oddity, no? Oh, wait, I remember now. Right after it happened, everyone on the right took to the airwaves and started yelling how Trayvon deserved what he got. No. Wait. That's not it. Hmmmm, what could it be...?
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 I believe the lynching has been tenatively scheduled for two days and 4 hours post trial, after the nation-wide race riots have quite litterally burned themselves out, and there is nothing left to loot from urban store-fronts. I should not mention this, but I was at the local Sheriff's office the other week for some paperwork crap on the bridge (courthouse and Sheriff's office are in same place). I stopped by the Sheriff's office to ask about trespassers. I saw two magnets inside the office with the 14 yr old Martin Hoody picture and poems called "I am Trayvon Martin" going on and on about how I am the silent victim of the "man" type crap. I wanted to engage the woman in discussion of the case but knew it was pointless. I left with a bad taste in my mouth wondering how someone could so easily be manipulated and view race as such a focal point of this non-issue. This person decides the fate of people, as well, by my understanding. That is scary. There are going to be race riots, there are going to be issues across this nation that I believe will surpass Rodney King. It's actually patent-pending, but I like your optimism. I really appreciate how seeing Zimmerman as someone who defended himself is "right wing" thinking and seeing Trayvon as a skittle-carrying pudgy-faced teen who was murdered in cold blood by a white hispanic for WWB in a GC is considered left-wing. I wonder how that happened. I wonder how the world became so divisive on this issue. It's really something of an oddity, no? Oh, wait, I remember now. Right after it happened, everyone on the right took to the airwaves and started yelling how Trayvon deserved what he got. No. Wait. That's not it. Hmmmm, what could it be...? white hispanic 1/4 black dude.
bbb Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Not to break up the patented, "right wing gang-bang" but I do find it interesting that if you only follow this case based on what major news sites have posted, you would think that the prosecution is wiping the floor with the defense... It is true that this is so skewed by who is reporting...........The parts that I have seen live though have been a joke in terms of the prosecution. I would be like Wait - how was that a witness for the state?
Recommended Posts