\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted March 18, 2012 Share Posted March 18, 2012 http://www.tulsaworld.com/specialprojects/news/crimewatch/article.aspx?subjectid=450&articleid=20120317_450_0_ASandS884784 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 18, 2012 Share Posted March 18, 2012 Wait, doesn't it say that it's not illegal because he was over 17? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted March 18, 2012 Share Posted March 18, 2012 Wait, doesn't it say that it's not illegal because he was over 17? No. It wouldn't be illegal if they weren't teacher/student at the same school. IMO, this shouldn't be against the law. She should be fired and not allowed to teach again, but the legal system shouldn't be involved (considering the age and consent). I consider it pretty disgusting that a teacher can't keep their hands off a student no matter what the age, and these teachers should never be allowed to take be in that role again. But IMO labeling this rape is more disgusting than the act itself. And yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 No. It wouldn't be illegal if they weren't teacher/student at the same school. IMO, this shouldn't be against the law. She should be fired and not allowed to teach again, but the legal system shouldn't be involved (considering the age and consent). I consider it pretty disgusting that a teacher can't keep their hands off a student no matter what the age, and these teachers should never be allowed to take be in that role again. But IMO labeling this rape is more disgusting than the act itself. And yes. So, you're saying the kid was, in effect, too old for her? I agree. It's only a good story if that way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts