aristocrat Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 wow, great deal for the rams...they can load up with some serious talent for their future. I love that people say you can't trade these picks.
Bronc24 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 If it was just 2 first rounders it would be one thing. But 3 first rounders plus more? Hell no. I would make that trade for Aaron rodgers or maybe drew brees, but not for a player who never took an nfl snap. Glad you're not our GM. Oh wait, you could be.
NoSaint Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Wow. And ppl here thought 2 first rounders would get the job done. Yeah right. We would have had to give up 4 first rounders probably. Jesus I think you can only do two years out
CardinalScotts Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 TOTALLY WORTH IT !!!.....good move washington they only gave up unproven draft picks.....they still have that salary cap space to spend on proven free agents. ya they haven't tried that yet !!
Bronc24 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Ya but he's a once in a generation player at least until next season! How could we not trade 4 starters for this years once in a generation player! Sooooo...you're saying our last three number ones and last year's number 2 are starters?
Doc Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Well, season ticket sales will most likely be taking another hit after last year. They signed TO after RW ordered Brandon, so it's not out of the question. That goes especially for Tebow, who RW wanted and then came out and said he didn't. The Bills didn't want Tebow and they won't want him if he becomes available. wow, great deal for the rams...they can load up with some serious talent for their future. I love that people say you can't trade these picks. No one says these picks can be traded, after the last CBA.
Beerball Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 3 #1's 2 #2's per shefter tweet. Wonder is that includes the swap of #1s this year? Really the same as what was reported earlier.
Doc Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Wonder is that includes the swap of #1s this year? Really the same as what was reported earlier. Yeah, it includes the swap of 1sts, so it's really not exactly 3-1's.
Bronc24 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) So really it's 2 ones and a two? No brainer for the Skins. Great deal for them. And the Rams. Edited March 10, 2012 by Marauder24
BillsVet Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 The Bills didn't want Tebow and they won't want him if he becomes available. Allow me to play you for a moment: Prove me wrong. And what prompted that outburst from RW after Tebow was selected in the first round? Argue if you will, but owners do not call out other teams after draft day about what they've done wrong. Bizarre behavior from an elderly man who clearly had something in mind when he made that statement.
JPS Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 3 #1's 2 #2's per shefter tweet. 4 top picks. That is insane!!!! Its like Ricky Wms and Mike Ditka all over again
DanInUticaTampa Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Sooooo...you're saying our last three number ones and last year's number 2 are starters? Yes, in recent years we used 1st round picks on dareus and wood who are great starters and 2nd round picks on byrd and levitre who are starters.
Beerball Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Yeah, it includes the swap of 1sts, so it's really not exactly 3-1's. The Rams have Peyton Manning to thank for this deal getting done so early. When Peyton narrowed his choices to Denver, Arizona & Miami the Redskins knew that they had to make this move. This leaves Manning or Flynn or possibly Kolb (if Manning goes to AZ) for Miami to go after. Am I missing anyone?
Doc Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Allow me to play you for a moment: Prove me wrong. And what prompted that outburst from RW after Tebow was selected in the first round? Argue if you will, but owners do not call out other teams after draft day about what they've done wrong. Bizarre behavior from an elderly man who clearly had something in mind when he made that statement. If that's your "proof," there's nothing to play at.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 It seems like everyone is treating Tebow's time in Denver as being at an end. Is it a sure thing?
Doc Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 The Rams have Peyton Manning to thank for this deal getting done so early. When Peyton narrowed his choices to Denver, Arizona & Miami the Redskins knew that they had to make this move. Yep. This leaves Manning or Flynn or possibly Kolb (if Manning goes to AZ) for Miami to go after. Am I missing anyone? I think it's basically Flynn, or stick with Moore, at this point. Again I can't see Manning wanting to play for Miami and Kolb stinks.
Doc Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 It seems like everyone is treating Tebow's time in Denver as being at an end. Is it a sure thing? I would think so. If I were Manning, I'd rather play in Denver than Miami or Arizona because they just came off a playoff season and have a good HC who isn't in his first coaching stint, much less his first year.
Beerball Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 4 top picks. That is insane!!!! Its like Ricky Wms and Mike Ditka all over again If I were a Skins fan I would be very happy.
Bronc24 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 I would think so. If I were Manning, I'd rather play in Denver than Miami or Arizona because they just came off a playoff season and have a good HC who isn't in his first coaching stint, much less his first year. And the team that was in the SB a few years ago and has Fitzgerald at WR is not a good option? Think, man. Think!
Recommended Posts