bigdon Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Do we want him back as a number 3? He could come in and already know the system and add valuable depth to the recieving corps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsForever Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Do we want him back as a number 3? He could come in and already know the system and add valuable depth to the recieving corps. No, no, no. NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Rise and shine, Mr. Van Winkle.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toshiero Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 No, no, no. NO! Hell no. For years I said he was nothing more than a #2 in the NFL at best, but ONLY on the Bills was he over hyped and over valued and thought of as a #1. Guess what? Stevie is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDaDdy Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 We had no speed after Donald Jones who wasn't that good and parrish who is too fragile went down. Why not. He had a year in the offense and knows the team and organization. Unless we are going to get a Vincent Jackson, Dwane Bowe or Marques Colston why not? Torrey Smith came on in Baltimore since Lee was hurt basically all year and Lee was expendable. I never was able to figure out the hate for a class act and good guy. He would come really cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobChalmers Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Do we want him back as a number 3? He could come in and already know the system and add valuable depth to the recieving corps. He wasn't even the #3 when the Bills let him go for a 4th round pick. He was at best #4 - that's why they didn't want him. Gailey (and I) would both rather have Stevie, Nelson, and Roscoe on the field before we got Evans out there. A healthy Easely probably pushes him even further down the lineup. And that's before Nix adds whoever he has said he intends to add to the WR corps this season. So, no. If he'd like to come back as a minimum-wage #6 WR I guess he'd be OK. I'd rather have him than Jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 I think there was more involved in the Lee Evans trade, than the Bills simply deciding he sucks, so lets get rid of him. I think there was more involved in the Lee Evans trade, than the Bills simply deciding he sucks, so lets get rid of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Jabber Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Evans is done...end of story!! If not, the Ravens would have kept him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 [This is an automated response] This subject matter is being currently being discussed or has already been discussed in a previous thread. Please consider using the "search" function before starting new topics. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts