birdog1960 Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 if i heard correctly, the talking heads said yestyerday that any new candidate after mich and ariz couldn't possibly get enough delegates to win. it would require a brokered convention for a dark horse to be nominated.
Magox Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) For any of you dipshits on this board that are thinking about voting for Santorum "We went into a recession in 2008 because of gasoline prices," Santorum said in Michigan according to Buzzfeed. "The bubble burst in housing because people couldnt pay their mortgages because of $4 a gallon gasoline." Yeah, like he'd have a real shot at beating Obama. Edited February 27, 2012 by Magox
3rdnlng Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 For any of you dipshits on this board that are thinking about voting for Santorum Yeah, like he'd have a real shot at beating Obama. Do you have a link for that? He can't possibly be that dumb.
Magox Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 Do you have a link for that? He can't possibly be that dumb. I originally read it on the hill, but it's now on Politico http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73349.html
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 I originally read it on the hill, but it's now on Politico http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73349.html There's no question that gas prices can have a affect on the economy but to say $20-$30 a week more for gas caused enough people to default on their mortgages, thus creating the recession, is DINish.
DC Tom Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 I originally read it on the hill, but it's now on Politico http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73349.html The commenters are every bit as stupid as Santorum is.
Chef Jim Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 I originally read it on the hill, but it's now on Politico http://www.politico....0212/73349.html I really hope that was taken waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of context.
IDBillzFan Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 I really hope that was taken waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of context. It won't matter even if it was. The headline is there. That's all that matters.
Magox Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 It won't matter even if it was. The headline is there. That's all that matters. No, that's what he meant. Read it!
birdog1960 Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 just heard the MI dems are gonna take a page from the rush limbo playbook and vote for santorum in the primary. seems they can become R for a day. yes, it would be difficult but there's poetic justice there me thinks.
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 just heard the MI dems are gonna take a page from the rush limbo playbook and vote for santorum in the primary. seems they can become R for a day. yes, it would be difficult but there's poetic justice there me thinks. Pretty cool, we need to pattern our country after Michigan.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 I originally read it on the hill, but it's now on Politico http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73349.html Almost as stupid as saying "Let Detroit go bankrupt" Almost
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 (edited) Almost as stupid as saying "Let Detroit go bankrupt" Almost Did he say "Let Detroit go bankrupt", or was he referring to GM and/or Chrysler? Edited February 28, 2012 by 3rdnlng
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 Why doesn't he move to Utah then... They got the closest thing to American theocracy there! Did he say "Let Detroit go bankrupt", or was he referring to GM and/or Chrysler? People must have personal grudges or something... Why in the heck would anyone want GM or Chrysler to go bankrupt? Sure for sh*ts and giggles it may be fun to watch... But come on...
IDBillzFan Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 (edited) No, that's what he meant. Read it! I don't need to read it because (1) it doesn't matter to me because he's not getting the nomination any way and (2) like I said, it doesn't matter if it was or wasn't out of context, it's in the headline, so that makes it the truth. I suspect there's this misconception that I'm a Santorum fan. I'm not. He simply isn't my kind of candidate because I genuinely don't care about the social issues. But given a choice between him and Obama, it's a no-brainer. Edited February 28, 2012 by LABillzFan
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 Why doesn't he move to Utah then... They got the closest thing to American theocracy there! People must have personal grudges or something... Why in the heck would anyone want GM or Chrysler to go bankrupt? Sure for sh*ts and giggles it may be fun to watch... But come on... Do you have any idea what you are saying? There is a difference with wanting them to go bankrupt and knowing the tried and true way of reorganizing. Obama entered the picture and changed the law and practice to help his donors. In bankruptcy there is a pecking order--Obama made it into a donor order.
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 Do you have any idea what you are saying? There is a difference with wanting them to go bankrupt and knowing the tried and true way of reorganizing. Obama entered the picture and changed the law and practice to help his donors. In bankruptcy there is a pecking order--Obama made it into a donor order. "Tried and true" ?? :lol: When it comes to family: "Send money, guns, and lawyers... Dad get me out of here!" We are all American "family"... Aren't we? How much more more "patriotic" can we be! By simply protecting "our own" as if they were "family."
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 "Tried and true" ?? :lol: When it comes to family: "Send money, guns, and lawyers... Dad get me out of here!" We are all American "family"... Aren't we? How much more more "patriotic" can we be! By simply protecting "our own" as if they were "family." Ex, yes we are! You should post more here
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 "Tried and true" ?? :lol: When it comes to family: "Send money, guns, and lawyers... Dad get me out of here!" We are all American "family"... Aren't we? How much more more "patriotic" can we be! By simply protecting "our own" as if they were "family." Bankruptcy Court has certain standards they need to adhere to. There is a reason. GM could have gone into Chapter 11 and let the courts decide. They cuddled up to Obama because they had no balls and let Obama give a large portion of the company to the union that put them in trouble. They screwed the preferred stockholders, you know the ones that had actually invested in the company. In the end it's going to be rather humorous watching the UAW negotiating with th UAW.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 28, 2012 Posted February 28, 2012 Bankruptcy Court has certain standards they need to adhere to. There is a reason. GM could have gone into Chapter 11 and let the courts decide. They cuddled up to Obama because they had no balls and let Obama give a large portion of the company to the union that put them in trouble. They screwed the preferred stockholders, you know the ones that had actually invested in the company. In the end it's going to be rather humorous watching the UAW negotiating with th UAW. The very fact that a pos like you is repeating this garbage points to the total bankruptcy of this argument
Recommended Posts