Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 (edited) Really? Aren't you the same guy that put Tom's quote in bold, underlined, huge font and stated Out of curiosity, how do you reconcile those 2 views? You state that it's a bad law but you're good with it. I don't think its a good law. It was basically taped together and rammed through. It won't really affect me all that much- I guess that's a bad outlook. So should we (you included) start calling the Bush Tax Cuts: The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 And The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 Chef- you are absolutely 100% right. You just keep hearing that garbage over and over again- then start spewing it as well......My bad. Edited March 6, 2012 by Adam
Taro T Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 I don't think its a good law. It was basically taped together and rammed through. It won't really affect me all that much- I guess that's a bad outlook. Yep.
IDBillzFan Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Really? Aren't you the same guy that put Tom's quote in bold, underlined, huge font and stated Out of curiosity, how do you reconcile those 2 views? You state that it's a bad law but you're good with it. It's how Adam stays in the middle. Yes, it's a bad law, and sure, that's okay, because it won't affect him much, and besides, Adam believes in compromise, even on things that don't require compromise. Plus, his health care won't change under Obamacare, until it does, when his provider closes shop because it was forced to take on everyone with a pre-determined condition and none of it's members wanted to pay the higher rate to cover those other members. But he'll be okay when he's forced to go into the government pool when that is all his employer can provide. And he'll be fine when the government starts adding a health care tax to ensure all Americans contribute to the health care law that was initially designed to lower the costs of health care and actually pay itself. Because Adam is built to compromise, and sometimes compromise means taking it in the mouth and the ass just so long as they promise not to stick it in your ears at the same time. Unless they need to. Then he'll be ready to compromise again.
Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 It's how Adam stays in the middle. Yes, it's a bad law, and sure, that's okay, because it won't affect him much, and besides, Adam believes in compromise, even on things that don't require compromise. Plus, his health care won't change under Obamacare, until it does, when his provider closes shop because it was forced to take on everyone with a pre-determined condition and none of it's members wanted to pay the higher rate to cover those other members. But he'll be okay when he's forced to go into the government pool when that is all his employer can provide. And he'll be fine when the government starts adding a health care tax to ensure all Americans contribute to the health care law that was initially designed to lower the costs of health care and actually pay itself. Because Adam is built to compromise, and sometimes compromise means taking it in the mouth and the ass just so long as they promise not to stick it in your ears at the same time. Unless they need to. Then he'll be ready to compromise again. Need a hanky, son?
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 It's how Adam stays in the middle. Yes, it's a bad law, and sure, that's okay, because it won't affect him much, and besides, Adam believes in compromise, even on things that don't require compromise. Plus, his health care won't change under Obamacare, until it does, when his provider closes shop because it was forced to take on everyone with a pre-determined condition and none of it's members wanted to pay the higher rate to cover those other members. But he'll be okay when he's forced to go into the government pool when that is all his employer can provide. And he'll be fine when the government starts adding a health care tax to ensure all Americans contribute to the health care law that was initially designed to lower the costs of health care and actually pay itself. Because Adam is built to compromise, and sometimes compromise means taking it in the mouth and the ass just so long as they promise not to stick it in your ears at the same time. Unless they need to. Then he'll be ready to compromise again. Still...makes more sense than when he decides to take a stand. I still want to know why birth control is free but my lithium ain't.
3rdnlng Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 (edited) Still...makes more sense than when he decides to take a stand. I still want to know why birth control is free but my lithium ain't. Because we can't take the chance of any more DCToms. Edited March 6, 2012 by 3rdnlng
Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Still...makes more sense than when he decides to take a stand. I still want to know why birth control is free but my lithium ain't. if I had to make sense to others, Id be a very unhappy person. Not too sure what lithium is used for, but i am a Nirvana fan.
Booster4324 Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Cut him some slack, he has been taking a stand lately.
IDBillzFan Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Need a hanky, son? Interestingly, I was just thinking that the government should provide free hankys to everyone because one time on CSI we saw someone use a hanky to clot the blood of a gunshot wound, and it only makes sense that everyone should have free hankies in case they, too, need to clot the blood of a gunshot wound. Because when I was in college, I suffered tremendous financial hardships because hankies cost me over $3000 a year, and I just don't understand why I should be subjected to such outrageous fees for something that has been proven to same lives. Wait. What was the problem again? Oh yeah, there was no problem. It was just a fake problem so we'd stop paying attention to our real problems. But we're ready to compromise, just in case.
Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Interestingly, I was just thinking that the government should provide free hankys to everyone because one time on CSI we saw someone use a hanky to clot the blood of a gunshot wound, and it only makes sense that everyone should have free hankies in case they, too, need to clot the blood of a gunshot wound. Because when I was in college, I suffered tremendous financial hardships because hankies cost me over $3000 a year, and I just don't understand why I should be subjected to such outrageous fees for something that has been proven to same lives. Wait. What was the problem again? Oh yeah, there was no problem. It was just a fake problem so we'd stop paying attention to our real problems. But we're ready to compromise, just in case. so do you want the hanky? It's a yea or no question.
3rdnlng Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Interestingly, I was just thinking that the government should provide free hankys to everyone because one time on CSI we saw someone use a hanky to clot the blood of a gunshot wound, and it only makes sense that everyone should have free hankies in case they, too, need to clot the blood of a gunshot wound. Because when I was in college, I suffered tremendous financial hardships because hankies cost me over $3000 a year, and I just don't understand why I should be subjected to such outrageous fees for something that has been proven to same lives. Wait. What was the problem again? Oh yeah, there was no problem. It was just a fake problem so we'd stop paying attention to our real problems. But we're ready to compromise, just in case. No, the issue was about hanky panky. Without the panky there is no way hankies are going to cost you $3000 a year. But then again if no man is involved should it cost anything?
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Cut him some slack, he has been taking a stand lately. You know, every so often I start thinking that maybe we shouldn't rag on him too much for finally taking a stand, and maybe we should be encouraging and supportive as he breaks out of his comfort zone. But then I remember what happens when he commits himself.
Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 You know, every so often I start thinking that maybe we shouldn't rag on him too much for finally taking a stand, and maybe we should be encouraging and supportive as he breaks out of his comfort zone. But then I remember what happens when he commits himself. you don't have to side with a group to be taking a stand on something. I don't care if i sound like an idiot more often than not. My opinion is the opinion of one person. I don't care if people agree with me, I don't care if they don't.
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 you don't have to side with a group to be taking a stand on something. I don't care if i sound like an idiot more often than not. My opinion is the opinion of one person. I don't care if people agree with me, I don't care if they don't. Want do we need to agree with?
Booster4324 Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 Absolutely nothing. You go Adam, express your opinion.
LeviF Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 (edited) You go Adam, express your opinion. Edited March 6, 2012 by LeviF91
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 you don't have to side with a group to be taking a stand on something. I don't care if i sound like an idiot more often than not. My opinion is the opinion of one person. I don't care if people agree with me, I don't care if they don't. And in your opinion, religious freedom is equivalent to letting the Catholic Church write their own constitution. It's not your stance I'm mocking you for; it's the absolute idiocy with which you express it.
Adam Posted March 6, 2012 Posted March 6, 2012 And in your opinion, religious freedom is equivalent to letting the Catholic Church write their own constitution. It's not your stance I'm mocking you for; it's the absolute idiocy with which you express it. You are correct about the second part- I really try on that, but I am decent at writing up sports, but not personal opinions. As far as the first part, that isn't my opinion at all- the business and religious aspects of the church are separate- it is a very muddled issue, I will say that.
Recommended Posts