Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.profootballweekly.com/2012/02/07/insider-manning-manningham-play-zapped-patriots-en

 

• "One thing that was really interesting to me was the (Giants') 12-men-on-the-field call at the end of the game. If Tom Coughlin intentionally put them out there, it was a helluva call. The competition committee is going to have to review that. I'll put 15 men on the field late in the game if it's going to run 15 seconds off the clock and only cost me five yards. They are going to need some type of equalizing rule where, if a defense is called for it in the final two minutes, they get the time back on the clock and x amount of yards. I'm not sure the Giants did it on purpose, but it sure worked in their favor. The seconds on the clock were much more valuable than five yards at that point."

Posted

I thought the same thing, and it was mentioned on post game shows. I'll gladly give up the 5 yards to run 8 seconds off he clock in that situation. I think the best case scenario in a situation like that is to award 5 yards and put the time back on the clock.

Posted

I remember back in the '98 season, the 49ers did this against the Bills at the end of the first half - well, not exactly the same, but continual defensive penalties until time ran off the clock and the Bills opted to kick a field goal rather than have only one shot at the end zone. I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often in late-game/half scenarios.

Posted

they could easily do away with this by making it a dead ball foul just like 12 men in the huddle. If the Defense has 12 men when the ball is snapped, the ref blows the play dead and the clock stays where it was.

Posted

they could easily do away with this by making it a dead ball foul just like 12 men in the huddle. If the Defense has 12 men when the ball is snapped, the ref blows the play dead and the clock stays where it was.

Or the offense might want to take the shot. Once a D gets burned on a stupid risky throw the offense wouldn't normally take- you'd see that stop.

Posted

The reverse of this is if a team needs the ball back and has no time outs they can throw an extra player on the field. Because of this the rule will not change. More often than no it will be in the defenses favor to stop the clock.

 

A rule change is a knee jerk reaction and would actually hinder the overall fairness regardless of this 1 loop hole

Posted

http://www.profootballweekly.com/2012/02/07/insider-manning-manningham-play-zapped-patriots-en

 

• "One thing that was really interesting to me was the (Giants') 12-men-on-the-field call at the end of the game. If Tom Coughlin intentionally put them out there, it was a helluva call. The competition committee is going to have to review that. I'll put 15 men on the field late in the game if it's going to run 15 seconds off the clock and only cost me five yards. They are going to need some type of equalizing rule where, if a defense is called for it in the final two minutes, they get the time back on the clock and x amount of yards. I'm not sure the Giants did it on purpose, but it sure worked in their favor. The seconds on the clock were much more valuable than five yards at that point."

 

I absolutely thought the same thing at the time, the risk reward is a no brainer--presuming the 12 man strategy works and they stop them, the time runs off and its only a 5 yard penalty. I wonder if they'd ever admit they did it on purpose, if so, it was the smartest play of the game. Heck, I would have done it again.

Posted

I thought the same thing, and it was mentioned on post game shows. I'll gladly give up the 5 yards to run 8 seconds off he clock in that situation. I think the best case scenario in a situation like that is to award 5 yards and put the time back on the clock.

 

Yep, was yelling at the TV, "Do it again!"

 

Good to finally see a Pats* game where the calls and league rules worked against them.

Posted

Saw that as well and remarked about it to my buddies. I also called out "intentional grounding" (half-jokingly since I never thought they'd call it, much less on them) on the Pats' first play, and they were impressed.

Posted

Defense can't keep doing that or put 15 or 20 people out there. Once offense notices it, they can simply spike the ball and get free 5 yards without losing much of time.

 

Not sure if Brady noticed Tuck was running out of field in that play and decided to take a chance on the long pass. The reason 8 seconds off the clock was because Brady threw a long pass. 12 men on the field didn't cause that.

Posted

I absolutely thought the same thing at the time, the risk reward is a no brainer--presuming the 12 man strategy works and they stop them, the time runs off and its only a 5 yard penalty. I wonder if they'd ever admit they did it on purpose, if so, it was the smartest play of the game. Heck, I would have done it again.

Golic said on the radio yesterday Buddy Ryan had them do this in a few games..so it has been done before.

Posted

I thought the same thing, and it was mentioned on post game shows. I'll gladly give up the 5 yards to run 8 seconds off he clock in that situation. I think the best case scenario in a situation like that is to award 5 yards and put the time back on the clock.

 

I agree.

 

Put the time back on the clock and award the five yards, and give the offense the ability to decline the penalty.

Posted

I agree.

 

Put the time back on the clock and award the five yards, and give the offense the ability to decline the penalty.

 

You cant let the offense run a complete play, and then decide if they want the time back and a do-over, or the penalty. When the D jumps offsides and the O gets a free play, the time doesnt go back on.

 

It would have to be a dead-ball foul with the whistle blowing immediately on the snap, and an automatic 5 yards.

Posted

You cant let the offense run a complete play, and then decide if they want the time back and a do-over, or the penalty. When the D jumps offsides and the O gets a free play, the time doesnt go back on.

 

It would have to be a dead-ball foul with the whistle blowing immediately on the snap, and an automatic 5 yards.

 

 

Exactly. You can't put time back on a clock no matter what.

Posted

You cant let the offense run a complete play, and then decide if they want the time back and a do-over, or the penalty. When the D jumps offsides and the O gets a free play, the time doesnt go back on.

 

It would have to be a dead-ball foul with the whistle blowing immediately on the snap, and an automatic 5 yards.

 

Sure, but what if that scenario plays put with a hail mary and the offense scores the would-be winning touchdown with no time left on the clock? I am not a fan of punishing the offense when it didn't commit the penalty.

 

Maybe I'm just not reading your response correctly.

Posted (edited)

Sure, but what if that scenario plays put with a hail mary and the offense scores the would-be winning touchdown with no time left on the clock? I am not a fan of punishing the offense when it didn't commit the penalty.

 

Maybe I'm just not reading your response correctly.

 

If preserving time if your goal, it would have to be treated like an Offensive False Start but against the D. Whistle blows immediately with no play being run, no chance for a hail mary until the next play. Offense gets 5 yards. No time went of the clock, so no time gets put back on. Offense isnt punished, it just got 5 free yards.

 

If you allow the play to run, and want to give the Offense the choice of taking the play, or taking the 5 yards, then the whatever time ran off the clock, stays off the clock.

Edited by DrDareustein
Posted

Sure, but what if that scenario plays put with a hail mary and the offense scores the would-be winning touchdown with no time left on the clock? I am not a fan of punishing the offense when it didn't commit the penalty.

 

Maybe I'm just not reading your response correctly.

 

 

You're not punishing the offense if you change the rule to make it a dead ball foul. It's either that or leave it as is and letting them have the choice of the 5 yards or the play. If Brady didn't want to waste clock against a 12 man defense, he could have spiked the ball. A game can't end on a defensive penalty so if it's the last play, that issue is moot.

Posted

If preserving time if your goal, it would have to be treated like an Offensive False Start but against the D. Whistle blows immediately with no play being run, no chance for a hail mary until the next play. Offense gets 5 yards. No time went of the clock, so no time gets put back on. Offense is punished, it just got 5 free yards.

 

I can get on board with that.

Posted (edited)

Isn't there a penalty where time is run off the clock after the 2 minute warning if there is an injury and a team is out of time outs? Well if they can run time off the clock, why can't they put time back on the clock?

Edited by Camel's Toe
×
×
  • Create New...