DC Tom Posted January 22, 2012 Posted January 22, 2012 What in the world are you talking about? The 2 unresolved situations since WWII are north and south Korea, and israeli and palestine. We'v been heavily involved both, at a huge cost to us in lives and dollars. Theres no evidence out involvement solves anything, in fact the evidence suggests out involvement prolongs conflicts indefinitely. It does when the ONLY evidence you cite is the conflicts that are indefinitely prolonged. You're effectively arguing that the unresolved conflicts we're involved in prove that our involvement leaves conflicts unresolved. If you even remotely think you're making anything resembling a valid point with that particular warped logic, you're an idiot.
truth on hold Posted January 22, 2012 Posted January 22, 2012 (edited) We left Vietnam when it was unresolved. North and South were then united. After a 20-year hiatus of severed ties, President Bill Clinton announced the formal normalization of diplomatic relations with Vietnam on July 11, 1995. Edited January 22, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 22, 2012 Posted January 22, 2012 The two significant tax cut experiments by Reagan and Bush2 resulted in significant increases in deficits. Bush2 added over $2 trillion in debt and he started with surpluses left over from Clinton. GG? GG?
Alaska Darin Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 The two significant tax cut experiments by Reagan and Bush2 resulted in significant increases in deficits. Bush2 added over $2 trillion in debt and he started with surpluses left over from Clinton. Simpleton garbage.
B-Man Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) Simpleton garbage. It doesnt even rise to that level AD..................but thats what they have been indoctrinated with. Now if they wish to argue that Reagan and W should be blamed for overspending, then I would be perfectly willing to listen to their arguments, But its clear that goverment revenue went up after the tax cuts that they are trying to blame......they didn't cause any deficits.......the predictable response of our government to having more "income" did. . Edited January 23, 2012 by B-Man
IDBillzFan Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 Now if they wish to argue that Reagan and W should be blamed for overspending, then I would be perfectly willing to listen to their arguments, It's not that W overspent. It's that he blew that surplus that Clinton gave us. Very important to bring up the Clinton surplus.
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 We left Vietnam when it was unresolved. North and South were then united. After a 20-year hiatus of severed ties, President Bill Clinton announced the formal normalization of diplomatic relations with Vietnam on July 11, 1995. I love the way you use "united" like it was by mutual consent, complete with a splendid signing ceremony. The evil US is gone! Now the diplomats can do their work! Guess you think if you put a snake and a frog together they will be "united".
Bigfatbillsfan Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 Lower taxes equates to more government revenue. Not more debt. You see, because lower taxes stimulates commerce thus increasing the amount of taxes taken in. Cool huh? You can keep telling yourself that. Sounds nice on paper but doesn't work.
3rdnlng Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 You can keep telling yourself that. Sounds nice on paper but doesn't work. A copy of your electroencephalogram below: __________________________________________________________________________________________
DC Tom Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 A copy of your electroencephalogram below: __________________________________________________________________________________________ Nice try. I'll give you an A for the idea, but a C- for execution.
3rdnlng Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 Nice try. I'll give you an A for the idea, but a C- for execution. It's the thought that counts.
Recommended Posts