Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Believing someone is incompetent doesn't equate to hatred. I'm sure in your opaque narrow world, everything is either black or white, sorry Din, that's not how I roll. So basically, you are an emotionally driven voter. Issues are secondary to you, you just want the guy with a "D" by his name gone Boooo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 So basically, you are an emotionally driven voter. Issues are secondary to you, you just want the guy with a "D" by his name gone Boooo! Oh the Irony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 So basically, you are an emotionally driven voter. Issues are secondary to you, you just want the guy with a "D" by his name gone Boooo! Seriously? You think Santorum's a lousy candidate because he's "not likable". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Seriously? You think Santorum's a lousy candidate because he's "not likable". As pertaining to his electability? Yes But my problems with him go much deeper, I think he's a twisted sob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 As pertaining to his electability? Yes In other words...So basically, you are an emotionally driven voter. Issues are secondary to you. But my problems with him go much deeper, I think he's a twisted sob. No need to be over-specific, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 In other words...So basically, you are an emotionally driven voter. Issues are secondary to you. Because I think Santoriums like ability, or lack there of, hurts his candidacy? That's a leap, but whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Because I think Santoriums like ability, or lack there of, hurts his candidacy? That's a leap, but whatever Jesus H Christ...how the hell is "I don't like him" not emotionally driven? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Jesus H Christ...how the hell is "I don't like him" not emotionally driven? Actually Dave in Nor !@#$ is saying that because he doesn't like Santorum, most of the country won't either. You know, pretty much the same thing as his Romney-is-rich-therefore-he-is-evil shtick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 Jesus H Christ...how the hell is "I don't like him" not emotionally driven? He's a chit head, I don't like him, and I totally oppose him politically. So what? I can't dislike him personally and on a policy level, too? Jesus Christ, what the fog horn are you talking about? I will expand....he is the true Conservative in the race, if you ask me. mitt? Conservative? I'm not so sure, maybe, but who knows? He might be a liberal in disguise, or he might be a ruthless government cutting savage, but I doubt it. Newt? Lol, he'd probably expand government and cut taxes, just like the typical Conservative politicians. But Santorium would probably support a balanced budget amendment, appoint psycho judges that would do gods know what, No thanks, he's just Plin in pants, if you ask me And on top of that, I think he is a mean women with issues. Someone made him angry somewhere in the past and he seems determined to take it out on all of us. Actually Dave in Nor !@#$ is saying that because he doesn't like Santorum, most of the country won't either. You know, pretty much the same thing as his Romney-is-rich-therefore-he-is-evil shtick. You need something useful to do, I'm going to take a dump, how about wiping my bum? It's about all you are good for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 He's a chit head, I don't like him, and I totally oppose him politically. So what? I can't dislike him personally and on a policy level, too? Jesus Christ, what the fog horn are you talking about? I will expand....he is the true Conservative in the race, if you ask me. mitt? Conservative? I'm not so sure, maybe, but who knows? He might be a liberal in disguise, or he might be a ruthless government cutting savage, but I doubt it. Newt? Lol, he'd probably expand government and cut taxes, just like the typical Conservative politicians. But Santorium would probably support a balanced budget amendment, appoint psycho judges that would do gods know what, No thanks, he's just Plin in pants, if you ask me And on top of that, I think he is a mean women with issues. Someone made him angry somewhere in the past and he seems determined to take it out on all of us. You need something useful to do, I'm going to take a dump, how about wiping my bum? It's about all you are good for I think Paul is more the 'true" conservative than Santorum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 I think Paul is more the 'true" conservative than Santorum. Ummm...ya, that's probably true. Especially if we consider foreign policy and see "true Conservatism" as the Taft Conservatism of the pre-Truman Doctrine era Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Ummm...ya, that's probably true. Especially if we consider foreign policy and see "true Conservatism" as the Taft Conservatism of the pre-Truman Doctrine era All about priorities. If you can't afford to wage war, then you don't wage war. Same philosophy for the entitlements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 All about priorities. If you can't afford to wage war, then you don't wage war. Same philosophy for the entitlements. Oh, I think we could afford both, if we wanted or needed to. There is no shortage of money, the financial system is way more flexible than given credit for. The baby boomers will be cared for, and if we need another war, and we might as much as I hate to think of that, it will be done and the world won't end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Oh, I think we could afford both, if we wanted or needed to. There is no shortage of money, the financial system is way more flexible than given credit for. The baby boomers will be cared for, and if we need another war, and we might as much as I hate to think of that, it will be done and the world won't end. that line of thinking is what leads to problems. There isn't money to take care of the baby boomers, but it looks like we will do ot anyways. I expect we will also be at war with Iran soon as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 STOP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 STOP! GO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 STOP! Hey, you're the one who agrees with him on voter related issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 Hey, you're the one who agrees with him on voter related issues. Exactly! I agree with you now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 1328846251[/url]' post='2380892']Hey, you're the one who agrees with him on voter related issues. I disagree with you disagreeing with him. There's a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 He's a chit head, I don't like him, and I totally oppose him politically. So what? I can't dislike him personally and on a policy level, too? Jesus Christ, what the fog horn are you talking about? I will expand....he is the true Conservative in the race, if you ask me. mitt? Conservative? I'm not so sure, maybe, but who knows? He might be a liberal in disguise, or he might be a ruthless government cutting savage, but I doubt it. Newt? Lol, he'd probably expand government and cut taxes, just like the typical Conservative politicians. But Santorium would probably support a balanced budget amendment, appoint psycho judges that would do gods know what, No thanks, he's just Plin in pants, if you ask me And on top of that, I think he is a mean women with issues. Someone made him angry somewhere in the past and he seems determined to take it out on all of us. You need something useful to do, I'm going to take a dump, how about wiping my bum? It's about all you are good for It is illegal to solicit someone to make you disappear (commit suicide). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts