DC Tom Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 It's fun to watch you try to be smart. Like playing with lab mice. If by "playing" you mean "experimenting on then dissecting to see the results," then yes, it's like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 25, 2012 Author Share Posted January 25, 2012 http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/23/the-republican-base-simply-does-not-like-mitt-romney-why-the-press-rarely-reports-it/ A friend of mine pointed out this morning that Mitt Romney has outspent Newt Gingrich $7 million to $.0008 million in Florida just to watch his 15 pt lead implode overnight. The Republican base does not trust Mitt Romney. Because they do not trust him, they do not like him as a candidate. His campaign, all too clever to try to sit on an ephemeral lead that any outside observer could see was more vaporware than reality, has decided to go fully negative now against Gingrich. This guy can't even buy the election, which is what he is trying to do, but his coziness with the press is so undeniable. The press hates Newt. This is a great article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 25, 2012 Author Share Posted January 25, 2012 It's fun to watch you try to be smart. Like playing with lab mice. I don't have to even try when answering a post of yours. Simpletons like you are easy to answer to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I've figured it out, you listen to Sean Hannity on the radio during the afternoon (which I don't believe I have ever listened not even 1 minutes worth in my entire life) , you read artices on Redstate, you are in reality a hardcore rightwinger. This whole shtick you have of you know, acting like the biggest leftist moron is all a charade, you do this to tarnish liberals, to make them appear as if they just fell off of the turnip truck. Bravo Dave Bravo!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I don't have to even try when answering a post of yours. Simpletons like you are easy to answer to You're like "The Who" later in their career when they were basically a parody of themselves. I love the attempt at condescension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 And yet the basis of Clinton's administration's "balancing the budget" was driven by higher capital gains tax revenues, which were stimulated by a nearly 30% REDUCTION of the capital gains tax rate. Now, how did that one come about, our mathematically challenged posters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I can't believe everyone here still responds to this troll. Dave isn't ruining this place. The people responding to him are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Lost in all of this is the fact that when taxes are raised, you are assuming those collecting them will use them in a rational, intelligent manner. I know I am a Canadian, but from my point of view, I'm not sure I'd trust any level of American government to spend wisely at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Lost in all of this is the fact that when taxes are raised, you are assuming those collecting them will use them in a rational, intelligent manner. I know I am a Canadian, but from my point of view, I'm not sure I'd trust any level of American government to spend wisely at this point. I certainly don't living under the Charest tyranny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I certainly don't living under the Charest tyranny. Ouch. Things are much better here in the beautiful province of Saskatchewan.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Ouch. Things are much better here in the beautiful province of Saskatchewan.... Politics is a tricky thing. Most people here vote for the Liberals as the alternative is the PQ which would mean that if they came back into power, people like me would be rounded up into labor camps to rebuild the french empire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Here we just take the french out back, beat the crap out of them and send them to Manitoba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 25, 2012 Author Share Posted January 25, 2012 http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837309/posts?page=1 Ha ha, coming from someone else I'd think this was a gaffe, but he totally means this that banks (corporations) are people, too. This guy is so out of touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 25, 2012 Author Share Posted January 25, 2012 I've figured it out, you listen to Sean Hannity on the radio during the afternoon (which I don't believe I have ever listened not even 1 minutes worth in my entire life) , you read artices on Redstate, you are in reality a hardcore rightwinger. This whole shtick you have of you know, acting like the biggest leftist moron is all a charade, you do this to tarnish liberals, to make them appear as if they just fell off of the turnip truck. Bravo Dave Bravo!!! Well no, I just can't listen to GR anymore because th Sabres are so depressing. Again with the attack on me? Simply for pointing out a flaw with PPP's great hero Mittens? Touchy, touchy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I was gonna play along and retort, but youre so not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) As my 4-year-old niece says, "Really?? REALLY!!??" How many Mitt Romney Evil Rich threads are you going to start? Just on the front page I count four emanating from your maw. Grow up. Edited January 25, 2012 by UConn James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 As my 4-year-old niece says, "Really?? REALLY!!??" How many Mitt Romney Evil Rich threads are you going to start? Just on the front page I count four emanating from your maw. Grow up. Ignore him and he'll go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837309/posts?page=1 Ha ha, coming from someone else I'd think this was a gaffe, but he totally means this that banks (corporations) are people, too. This guy is so out of touch. Supreme Court says they are. Guess that makes him less "out of touch" than your sorry ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Dear Liberal Retard: We will gladly and happily advocate for the removal of the designation of corporations as "people" and all the political power that goes along with it when you do the same for Unions. Signed, Every single taxpayer thats not a member of a Union...and some who are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Dear Liberal Retard: We will gladly and happily advocate for the removal of the designation of corporations as "people" and all the political power that goes along with it when you do the same for Unions. Signed, Every single taxpayer thats not a member of a Union...and some who are. And you said you weren't going to retort. kitty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts