Gary M Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 http://news.yahoo.com/stop-mr-president-quit-giving-money-away-172000333.html
Dante Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 It's all about wealth redistribution for this guy. CRA, HUD, Obamacare here. Why not to the rest of the world.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed?
Jauronimo Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed? Is Bangladesh one of the 57 states?
3rdnlng Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Is Bangladesh one of the 57 states? He has a reading comprehension problem, if he bothers to read what he comments on, if he can read.
Dante Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed? Here's a thought. How about they quit popping out kids you can't feed? Instead of sending them cash just air drop several thousand cases of condoms.
Jauronimo Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Oh, I get it. Government spending in Bangladesh increases consumer demand domestically.
3rdnlng Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Here's a thought. How about they quit popping out kids you can't feed? Instead of sending them cash just air drop several thousand cases of condoms. You've just solved the problem for Dave. He had stated that in giving them the billion we would get it right back. I was wondering how that was going to happen. Eureka, all we have to do is buy a schitload of condoms from an American company and give them to Bangladesh. That way we get our money back. You and Dave make a great team. You should consider a partnership.
Dante Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 You've just solved the problem for Dave. He had stated that in giving them the billion we would get it right back. I was wondering how that was going to happen. Eureka, all we have to do is buy a schitload of condoms from an American company and give them to Bangladesh. That way we get our money back. You and Dave make a great team. You should consider a partnership. Hey, consider it promotion for the condom companies. Next schitload they have to buy!
EasternOHBillsFan Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Here's a thought. How about they quit popping out kids you can't feed? Instead of sending them cash just air drop several thousand cases of condoms. Be very, very careful with your choice of words... People in this country forget where they came from, poor families of multiple children for centuries. You probably wouldn't be here if at least one of your ancestors had not popped out your descendant in a shack somewhere, but then again continue on... you OBVIOUSLY know all the answers.
DC Tom Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Oh, I get it. Government spending in Bangladesh increases consumer demand domestically. Yes, because a better standard of living in Bangladesh leads to a more efficient work force leads to cheaper polo shirts at ZombieMart.
Rob's House Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed? Assuming you're not a troll just trying to get a rise out of people, your understanding of economics is a !@#$ing joke. You're like a kid who played Madden a couple of times & now thinks he's an authority on all things football.
BillsFanM.D. Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed? Please define 'right back.' From my view, we'll be paying interest on that billion from now to ..........................
Koko78 Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Assuming you're not a troll just trying to get a rise out of people, your understanding of economics is a !@#$ing joke. You're like a kid who played Madden a couple of times & now thinks he's an authority on all things football. He's very good at making it hard to determine whether he's a troll or just a moron.
3rdnlng Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 He's very good at making it hard to determine whether he's a troll or just a moron. Even if somehow he could be a troll, he's a moron too.
OCinBuffalo Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 Assuming you're not a troll just trying to get a rise out of people, your understanding of economics is a !@#$ing joke. You're like a kid who played Madden a couple of times & now thinks he's an authority on all things football. A troll knows enough to play the foil, and get the poster to respond to actual post. Dave doesn't know how to do anything other than be dismissed as an idiot. So...you're safe. Don't expect some great reveal coming. Dave is simply exemplary of the left in general: poor personal understanding/willful denial of business/economics, which explains why they they must rely on Paul Krugman, yet have no way of knowing if what he says is accurate. In contrast, I can critique Milton Friedman or any other right-leaning economist, because I understand the material. They are incapable of understanding, never mind refuting, Krugman. And what do we get in response when we point out their patent ignorance? They tell us we are mean, or less "moral", or less "honorable", ...for knowing WTF we are talking about? Yes, our "meaness" is the excuse for their ignorance.
DC Tom Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 A troll knows enough to play the foil, and get the poster to respond to actual post. Dave doesn't know how to do anything other than be dismissed as an idiot. Or he's just doing it wrong. Being a troll doesn't preclude being an idiot.
B-Large Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 http://news.yahoo.com/stop-mr-president-quit-giving-money-away-172000333.html I think for every $1 of spending over the spending the law requires or as agree in the fiscal year budget, taxes should raised by $1. The majority of Americans could care less about the Government spending because they never actually have to pay for it, it essentially is on a Credit Card. Take it directly out of the income and all of the sudden people will take notice.
Gary M Posted January 18, 2012 Author Posted January 18, 2012 Yes! Crazy!!! "Borrowing" money to feed people! Nuts! Money that will end right back in our own economy, crazy! Carzy! Crazy! Who is the idiot that wrote this op-ed? Dave, please go borrow 2% of your gross income and donate it a deserving group.
Adam Posted January 18, 2012 Posted January 18, 2012 It's all about wealth redistribution for this guy. CRA, HUD, Obamacare here. Why not to the rest of the world. You left out Obama Soap
Recommended Posts