Dave_In_Norfolk Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Tom threw out the totally unmeasurable argument that he can't lead, ya, whatever. Do your worst
Dante Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Tom threw out the totally unmeasurable argument that he can't lead, ya, whatever. Do your worst He could never lead me because I wouldn't want to be led by him.
IDBillzFan Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Libya. If you're going to have a thread to discuss Obama's inability to lead, shouldn't the thread title be "The Great Obama Is a Bad Leader Thread"? And maybe you should add some quotes or hyphens because in reality, doesn't "Obama is a Bad Leader" modify the kind of thread it is? So it should probably say The Great Obama-Is-A-Bad-Leader Thread or The Great "Obama is a Bad Leader" Thread. You could also use italics like I do above, I suppose. Regardless, the discussion is about him being a bad leader, not a bad president, though the argument could be made that the arguments for him being a bad leader would also work for arguing he's a bad president. But is he a bad leader because he's a bad president, or is he a bad president because he's a bad leader? Tricky. Think about it and get back to us, mmmmkay Dave?
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 If you're going to have a thread to discuss Obama's inability to lead, shouldn't the thread title be "The Great Obama Is a Bad Leader Thread"? And maybe you should add some quotes or hyphens because in reality, doesn't "Obama is a Bad Leader" modify the kind of thread it is? So it should probably say The Great Obama-Is-A-Bad-Leader Thread or The Great "Obama is a Bad Leader" Thread. You could also use italics like I do above, I suppose. Regardless, the discussion is about him being a bad leader, not a bad president, though the argument could be made that the arguments for him being a bad leader would also work for arguing he's a bad president. But is he a bad leader because he's a bad president, or is he a bad president because he's a bad leader? Tricky. Think about it and get back to us, mmmmkay Dave? Dave's head just exploded.
Rob's House Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 (edited) ...But is he a bad leader because he's a bad president, or is he a bad president because he's a bad leader? Tricky. Think about it and get back to us, mmmmkay Dave? He views both as separate and independent qualities; this is where he excels at multi-tasking. Edited January 12, 2012 by Rob's House
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 (edited) He views both as separate and independent qualities; this is where he excels at multi-tasking. I'm beginning to feel bad about picking on him, even though I've never seen an intelligent post out of DIN. It's obvious that he can't put 2 and 2 together. Put yourself in his place, when you get a chance to get laid for the first time in your life and all you can tell her/him is "Obama good, everyone else bad", you've blown your chance. That's not pillow talk. Unless Chance is the name of his special friend, he ain't getting any. Edited January 12, 2012 by 3rdnlng
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 You give me **** for crusades and yet continue to ask for real estate licenses after years. You give me **** for being an ass and this is a mild post for you. That is just 9 kinds of awesome. Thanks for the "Thumbs Up". I don't know what my post had to do with real estate licenses, maybe asking lyrbob what his experience is in real estate and mortgages when he/she is just a faux expert, but why is this pertinent now? I give you schit fror being an ass because, well, you are an ass.
Booster4324 Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Thanks for the "Thumbs Up". I don't know what my post had to do with real estate licenses, maybe asking lyrbob what his experience is in real estate and mortgages when he/she is just a faux expert, but why is this pertinent now? I give you schit fror being an ass because, well, you are an ass. I am giving you **** dumbass
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 I am giving you **** dumbass Well thanks for the **** but I've had better bjobs from lesser people than you pretend to be.
Booster4324 Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Well thanks for the **** but I've had better bjobs from lesser people than you pretend to be. bjobs is 5 letters, but you have always struggled with spelling, so props. Well done.
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 bjobs is 5 letters, but you have always struggled with spelling, so props. Well done. Hey, you asked for "extra squirt". I came through, now you're bitcheing about it?
Booster4324 Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Hey, you asked for "extra squirt". I came through, now you're bitcheing about it? ... Nohght I rikkconanf a spellcheck?
3rdnlng Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 ... Nohght I rikkconanf a spellcheck? Getting by the language police? Assshole.
DC Tom Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Dave's head just exploded. No great loss. It's not like he uses it for anything.
Jauronimo Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Tom threw out the totally unmeasurable argument that he can't lead, ya, whatever. Do your worst DC Tom's inability to lead cannot be quantified and its because Obama is a bad president? This development is as shocking as it is confusing.
Bigfatbillsfan Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Libya. Really? He lead the charge to overthrow a dictator without ever putting one single American boot on the ground and somehow this makes him a bad leader?
GG Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 No great loss. It's not like he uses it for anything. Nor do you have to worry about scatter mass.
IDBillzFan Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Really? He lead the charge to overthrow a dictator without ever putting one single American boot on the ground and somehow this makes him a bad leader? Ummmm, "he' didn't lead anything. France did. Which is good, because initially "he" said it would only take a few days, so when it ended up taking months, he could do what he does best: blame someone else for not hitting his stated goals.
Bigfatbillsfan Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 Ummmm, "he' didn't lead anything. France did. Which is good, because initially "he" said it would only take a few days, so when it ended up taking months, he could do what he does best: blame someone else for not hitting his stated goals. So because the French couldn't get it done on time it's Obama's fault? Whatevs dude.
Recommended Posts