PromoTheRobot Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 (edited) Not that I know of such things. PTR Edited January 11, 2012 by PromoTheRobot
boyst Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Not that I know of such things. PTR But how does it help? Also, guns are not as dangerous as bullets.
The Poojer Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 I disagree...seperately, if you hit someone over the head with a gun, it will hurt a lot more than if you hit them over the head with a bullet. But how does it help? Also, guns are not as dangerous as bullets.
Chef Jim Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 It's not a stoner's lung function I'm concerned about.
Wooderson Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Not that I know of such things. PTR Dude, that's so rad.
Fingon Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Turns out pot smokers, on average, are smarter than non-users at age 50. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-drugs-idUSTRE8030AE20120104
Mark Vader Posted January 13, 2012 Posted January 13, 2012 It's not a stoner's lung function I'm concerned about. Turns out pot smokers, on average, are smarter than non-users at age 50. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-drugs-idUSTRE8030AE20120104 And between the ages of 0-49?
Captain Hindsight Posted January 13, 2012 Posted January 13, 2012 Mary jane will be legal in my lifetime.
Since 1972 Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Mary jane will be legal in my lifetime. How old are you?
CosmicBills Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Mary jane will be legal in my lifetime. Move to Cali.
Just Jack Posted January 17, 2012 Posted January 17, 2012 Move to Cali. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MbZMpJZc50
PromoTheRobot Posted January 17, 2012 Author Posted January 17, 2012 (edited) Those crazy Canadians are about to make it legal. Niagara Falls, ON may become the next Amsterdam. This might make it easier to get free agents to sign in Buffalo. Just have Buddy Nix meet prospective players at the Sundowner. PTR Edited January 17, 2012 by PromoTheRobot
Chandemonium Posted January 19, 2012 Posted January 19, 2012 From the first line of the article: "Smoking a joint once a week or a bit more apparently doesn't harm the lungs" My question is, does smoking one cigarette a week harm the lungs? Unless you're comparing like amounts of marijuana and tobacco use, this study doesn't mean much.
Pete Posted January 19, 2012 Posted January 19, 2012 I went for a run this morning- after burning. And time to burn again
Chef Jim Posted January 19, 2012 Posted January 19, 2012 I went for a run this morning- after burning. And time to burn again You know how stupid this sounds. Imagine if one of us said "I did a couple of shots this morning and went for a run. I think it's time for a couple of more shots." Time to grow up man.
KD in CA Posted January 19, 2012 Posted January 19, 2012 From the first line of the article: "Smoking a joint once a week or a bit more apparently doesn't harm the lungs" My question is, does smoking one cigarette a week harm the lungs? Unless you're comparing like amounts of marijuana and tobacco use, this study doesn't mean much. My guess is no, smoking one cigarette per week does not harm the lungs. But I don't know many people with a one-cig a week habit. I went for a run this morning- after burning. And time to burn again Do you have a job?
Chef Jim Posted January 19, 2012 Posted January 19, 2012 My guess is no, smoking one cigarette per week does not harm the lungs. But I don't know many people with a one-cig a week habit. Do you have a job? He's a chef remember. One of the few jobs that requires you to be !@#$ed up on some sort of substance pretty much all the time. My guess is no, smoking one cigarette per week does not harm the lungs. But I don't know many people with a one-cig a week habit. And I know fewer that have a one joint a week habit.
Recommended Posts