Marc in MontrÈal Posted January 6, 2012 Posted January 6, 2012 (edited) http://walterfootball.com/draft2012charlie_3.php seems to know what we need. And that TE from Clemson is awesome, and since Fitz can't throw far, a TE is a perfect pick in the 2nd round. We could use double TE formations with Chandler (when he is healthy). I agree with you about going with a spread formation that would feature 2 TE. It would suit Fitzpatrick perfectly: -Fitzpatrick is not the most accurate so he needs big targets with reliable hands. Would help 3rd-and-short conversions, which we didn't do a great job at last year. -I don't see a need to stretch the field that much. Fitz is not at his best throwing long bombs. It is just an interception waiting to happen. We know it, defenses know it. Why kid ourselves. We are not going to outsmart anyone. - 2 TE sets could potentially help the running game and red zone efficiency. - TE normally are not asked to run long-developing patterns and present a greater challenge to bump at the LOS. Of course I don't follow the NCAA and know nothing about that specific TE. But I'm all for a spread formation with 2 TE. That is, of course, if we decide to stand pat with Fitz and do not draft a QB in the 1st round, which I wouldn't mind. Marc in Montréal Edited January 6, 2012 by Marc in MontrÈal
Cheddar's Dad Posted January 6, 2012 Posted January 6, 2012 I'd be fine with Mercilus in the first round, but I have a feeling he might be gone by 10. ] Mercilus will be there in Rd. 3
Dr. Fong Posted January 6, 2012 Posted January 6, 2012 Mercilus will be there in Rd. 3 Care to place a wager on that?
John from Riverside Posted January 6, 2012 Posted January 6, 2012 I would actually prefer the pick he went away from In Vinny Curry..... Draft defense.....lots of it
Recommended Posts