....lybob Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Behavior like that needs to be punished and there is no greater punishment than for him to remain on this loser organization - throw the franchise tag on this miscreant that will show him.
BRH Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 This. Chan always seemed to get a pained look on his face this year when questioned about Stevie's various antics and I just don't think he wants Stevie on his team. That really sucks because Stevie does have some talent and we need all the talent we can get. For all the people talking about Stevie's talent: how many games did it win us? Then: How many games did his drops and stupidity cost us?
Best Player Available Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 He's the best player on the team. If you're going to choose a loser head coach over the best player on the team, you're pretty much telling everyone that you don't care about winning. Fred Jackson disagrees big time.
Ramius Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Stevie stays, Chan goes. +1 There is no need to let talent walk. How about getting some complementary talent next to him? But no, he's gonna walk, and we'll waste our #1 pick on a WR.
bananathumb Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Football is a game of discipline. A lot of kids today don't accept discipline and they don't make it in the big, bad world of the NFL and Life.
Endless Ike Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) Totally support the benching, but letting him walk puts the lie to "building through the draft"...if they're not building through the draft, and they're not building through free agency, well then they're all out of options, and they're spinning their wheels. Business as usual = wake me up when they make the playoffs. Edited January 1, 2012 by Endless Ike
Kevin Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Hell, I'd say let him walk now. Let some other team deal with his crap. Maybe the other team can take these posters with him (May Day 10, BuffaloByrd). THAT WOULD BE GRRRRREAT!
Offside Number 76 Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Gailey: team policy established earlier in the season was any penalty for demonstration would result in bench for rest of game.
BRH Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Yeah, I'm sure pro athletes spend their free time reading some of the garbage "fans" post here. I was a shirt that said Happy New Year. He probably shouldn't have done it but it get deal with. But let's not act like the guy had swaiskas on his shirt or something. If the guy had swastikas on his shirt I would have said a lot worse. He put himself above the team. Again. Tell me why this should be tolerated.
Kevin Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Totally support the benching, but letting him walk puts the lie to "building through the draft"...if they're not building through the draft, and they're not building through free agency, well then they're all out of options, and they're spinning their wheels. Business as usual = wake me up when they make the playoffs. Be careful what you wish for. You may be down for awhile. May wanna notify loved ones so they don't bury you haha.
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Stevie's act was immature and selfish, the second time he pulled such a penalty in a divisional game this season. Chan had no choice but to pull him. Belichick would have cut him on the spot. That being said, the Bills need to re-sign him and SJ needs to learn his lesson. Really? Because the precedent would be Welker's foot comments re: Ryan. It got him benched for a bit of the game and then he came in. Chan was less serious about winning this game than about teaching Stevie a lesson. No fun league (unless you're Aaron Hernandez high-stepping into the end zone). Happy New Year.
1billsfan Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Yeah pay him franchise money. That will teach him a lesson. Yeah, compare one year 9 million to 25 million guaranteed. Players get hurt playing this game. He basically blew 16 to 20 million extra of guaranteed money. The Bills need a #1 WR so he isn't going anywhere next year because they aren't drafting a WR in the 1st with the team giving up 49 points in three quarters today.
BRH Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Gailey: team policy established earlier in the season was any penalty for demonstration would result in bench for rest of game. But but but he's our best receiver! Whaaaaaa! (not directed at you,76)
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 I guess we can say goodbye to Stevie. Why would Chan bench him after he made a penatly that was no factor in a game the Bills should have played everyone to kick the crap out of the pats. I know the season was lost but 2-0 vs the Pats would have been a sweet ending.....Goodbye Stevie we will miss you.. You're overreacting. I bet SJ takes the punishment like a man, and it will have no impact whatsoever on whether the Bills resign him...
Endless Ike Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Fred Jackson disagrees big time. Fred has maybe 1 or 2 more good years...
Slack_in_MA Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) Behavior like that needs to be punished and there is no greater punishment than for him to remain on this loser organization - throw the franchise tag on this miscreant that will show him. Edited January 1, 2012 by Slack_in_MA
Ramius Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Hey buddy Nix, what happened to "keeping your own"?
Kevin Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Gailey: team policy established earlier in the season was any penalty for demonstration would result in bench for rest of game. Gailey had no choice but to bench him. He doesn't bench Stevie then he looks like punk for doing so. He probably loses a lot of respect in the locker room too.
benderbender Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Waive goodbye to Stevie! The next coming of T.O. already has his bags packed.
BRH Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Really? Because the precedent would be Welker's foot comments re: Ryan. It got him benched for a bit of the game and then he came in. Chan was less serious about winning this game than about teaching Stevie a lesson. No fun league (unless you're Aaron Hernandez high-stepping into the end zone). Happy New Year. That's not the precedent unless Belichick already told the team anyone who made fun of an opposing hc would be benched for the whole game. I'm guessing he didn't.
Recommended Posts