EldaBillsFan Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 All tied up @ 2 wins.... Makes you think what will happen of the Viking or Rams get the first pick....do they draft Luck? Or use him as huge trade bait.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 All tied up @ 2 wins.... Makes you think what will happen of the Viking or Rams get the first pick....do they draft Luck? Or use him as huge trade bait.... Rams will trade the pick for multiple picks: they have too much invested in Bradford and they have holes all over the place. Vikes will either trade the pick or keep it and trade Ponder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nichebiche Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Rams will trade the pick for multiple picks: they have too much invested in Bradford and they have holes all over the place. Vikes will either trade the pick or keep it and trade Ponder Colts still have to win next week because they hold the SOS tiebreaker advantage. If the Rams do end up with the 1st pick, I can see them taking Luck and trading Bradford, just as you suggest the Vikings could do with Ponder. The Browns would be an ideal trade partner, with 2 1sts this year and would reunite Bradford with his former OC Pat Shurmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endless Ike Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Colts still have to win next week because they hold the SOS tiebreaker advantage. If the Rams do end up with the 1st pick, I can see them taking Luck and trading Bradford, just as you suggest the Vikings could do with Ponder. The Browns would be an ideal trade partner, with 2 1sts this year and would reunite Bradford with his former OC Pat Shurmer. No way the Rams would pick Luck when they could turn it around and trade for multiple #1s from someone. Bradford is going to be very good if the Rams had any talent around him...Adding 3 extra first round draft picks in the next three years to their team would make them a potential dynasty, as bradford is still very young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billnutinphoenix Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Anyone who wouldn't take Luck is foolish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 No way the Rams would pick Luck when they could turn it around and trade for multiple #1s from someone. Bradford is going to be very good if the Rams had any talent around him AND HE CAN STAY HEALTHY...Adding 3 extra first round draft picks in the next three years to their team would make them a potential dynasty, as bradford is still very young. Fixed it The question is, is adding 3 unknown rookies over 3 years going to improve the team more then adding a potential Manning/Brady with a smaller contract then Bradfords, freeing up cap space? Thats where they questioning is going to happen over if you take him or try and trade the pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endless Ike Posted December 23, 2011 Share Posted December 23, 2011 (edited) Fixed it The question is, is adding 3 unknown rookies over 3 years going to improve the team more then adding a potential Manning/Brady with a smaller contract then Bradfords, freeing up cap space? Thats where they questioning is going to happen over if you take him or try and trade the pick The reason he can't stay healthy in STL is because he gets his face smashed to bits by the pass rush every game....adding three unknown rookies from a very bad team is a better bet than 1 unknown rookie. There's a real good chance that two of those #1s could be top 5 or top 10 Edited December 23, 2011 by Endless Ike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts