Booger Posted December 20, 2011 Posted December 20, 2011 the Topic Title should sum it up. A QB such as Kelly is what it takes to be successful in the NFL...and my "definition" of successful is a team that competes for 16 games, makes it to the playoffs and wins in the playoffs (ROMO is NOT successful). Why do we continue to settle when an average QB comes in and wins a game or two. Why not continue to look for a true SKILLED winner? I love so much about Fitz, except his skill set. Gailey has a knack to make average QB's look decent but when it comes time for adaptation they are limited. They cannot make the big throw or improvise. When the system breaks down, they break down. We are seeing this firsthand. Imagine a Rogers or Brees in Gailey's system....
Recommended Posts