DaveinElma Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/states-imperiled-warming-rebel-climate-talks-053014602.html Negotiators were arguing over the wording of a range of highly technical sections that make up the broad agreement, which covers a range of topics from greenhouse gas emissions targets to forestry accounting rules, green tech transfers and cash to help poor countries adapt to climate change. Letting the cat out of the bag. "Global Warming" has never been about science-just wealth redistribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buff_bills4ever Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/states-imperiled-warming-rebel-climate-talks-053014602.html Letting the cat out of the bag. "Global Warming" has never been about science-just wealth redistribution. Correction. Global Warming is backed by scientific evidence. It's the "solutions" to it that are ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Correction. Global Warming is backed by scientific evidence. It's the "solutions" to it that are ridiculous. Global warming may be real, it's the cause that is unknown and attracts all the snake oil salesmen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 http://www.infowars.com/un-calls-for-eco-fascist-world-government-at-durban-summit/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 http://www.infowars.com/un-calls-for-eco-fascist-world-government-at-durban-summit/ Infowars? You're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Infowars? You're an idiot. Just having a little fun but I bet you didn't even bother to read it, did you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Sometimes I wonder if we: 1. Are paying for the UN to give all the insignificant countries a chance to be: significant. or 2. Are paying for the UN to give all the insignificant countries a chance to be: significant. Funny how that sentence means 2 completely different things, huh? Either way, we will veto this nonsense. Global Warming couldn't be a more dead issue politically. Apparently nobody has told the one-world government socialists, I mean, the environmentalists. Sorry, I always get them confused. Of course, that may fall under #2 above, and is therefore intentional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts