PromoTheRobot Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 not suitable for the board either .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Clicked the link before it was removed. I've seen better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I don't think I have ever seen Lindsay Lohan in one acting performance. I got no interest in seeing her nude... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 They're on _____________. Pics are ok, nothing special. She lacks any real sexiness IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Fong Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 They're on _____________. Pics are ok, nothing special. She lacks any real sexiness IMO. I agree. The fact that the spread is a Marilyn Monroe theme wasn't doing my interest any favors either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 They're on ________ Pics are ok, nothing special. She lacks any real sexiness IMO. While I understand Google can lead anybody to the end of the trail here let's not make this so easy for those who are offended or not of age to see such material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 aaaairbrushed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted December 9, 2011 Author Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) I thought "NSFW" took care of the naughty stuff? I even used it twice! PTR Edited December 9, 2011 by PromoTheRobot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I thought "NSFW" took care of the naughty stuff? I even used it twice! PTR Gray area thing. I don't know where exactly the line is, but there's clearly a limit for what NSFW allows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Hmmm... I'm surprised at all the indignance. I'd nail the kooky broad. Sure she's a wreck and a public menace, but I kind of like the freckly redhead thing. And she's still got about 3 or 4 minutes of bloom left on that rose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Hmmm... I'm surprised at all the indignance. I'd nail the kooky broad. Sure she's a wreck and a public menace, but I kind of like the freckly redhead thing. And she's still got about 3 or 4 minutes of bloom left on that rose. There's kooky, then there's drug addled. I think she's the latter, and I suspect she looks about 40 at this point w/o any makeup or airbrushing. Edited December 9, 2011 by SageAgainstTheMachine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Gray area thing. I don't know where exactly the line is, but there's clearly a limit for what NSFW allows. Boobies = NSFW Franks & Beans = Banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 There's kooky, then there's drug addled. I think she's the later, and I suspect she looks about 40 at this point w/o any makeup or airbrushing. You might be right. She can look really hot at some angles, but if you threw a bucket of water on her, she might turn into this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 There's kooky, then there's drug addled. I think she's the latter, and I suspect she looks about 40 at this point w/o any makeup or airbrushing. Im with ya. I wouldnt take the trouble to click a direct link even if the mods allowed it. This photoshoot is 7 years too late (and shes 25). She has been old, used, busted, and gnarled since at least 20. There are 40 year olds who have fresher bodies. No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Hmmm... I'm surprised at all the indignance. I'd nail the kooky broad. Sure she's a wreck and a public menace, but I kind of like the freckly redhead thing. And she's still got about 3 or 4 minutes of bloom left on that rose. I felt that way for a while, too. I just view her and her family (especially her dad) as just one long line of f-tards. Any part of me that found her hot or sexy has been completely wiped away...I hear about the stuff she's done and it just boggles the mind. She's got some serious issues..just like her father does...and I just can't view her in the same way anymore. If Rachel McAdams is ever in a spread, count me in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Wow!!! While I understand Google can lead anybody to the end of the trail here let's not make this so easy for those who are offended or not of age to see such material. I'm a dude...I like seeing nekkid chix...kooky or not Hmmm... I'm surprised at all the indignance. I'd nail the kooky broad. Sure she's a wreck and a public menace, but I kind of like the freckly redhead thing. And she's still got about 3 or 4 minutes of bloom left on that rose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 (edited) Ewww... she's all naked and stuff! Gross! edit: Ok, after viewing the pictures I must ask how is she 20something? I have seen better bodies on 30 and 40 year old women! She looks soft, no tone...meh. I've seen much better. Plus her being a ginger making her so pale - gingers have no souls. Edited December 10, 2011 by jboyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 yawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 (edited) I haven't seen the pics, but I am amused by the fact that many of you aren't interested. Considering most of you are the same people who would "yes" 48-year-old cross-eyed teachers from Fresno who lure kids into their basements for extra biology tutoring. At least be consistent. Lohan can't look that awful. Edited December 10, 2011 by GOBILLS78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts