meazza Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 The anti-union rhetoric won't stop until they cease to exist, find something else to whine about. How about finding a reason to like unions?
Alaska Darin Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Question do you take money to live in Alaska? I'm not sure what you're asking me. Do you take money from unions to spew the ridiculous rhetoric that politicians have been using to bankrupt the middle class taxpayer?
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 The anti-union rhetoric won't stop until they cease to exist, find something else to whine about. Do you have anything to say that has some substance to it? Your proclamations are weak and of a feeble nature.
B-Large Posted December 9, 2011 Author Posted December 9, 2011 required....there's the problem. Even if "I" stink at what I do, you 'have' to hire me (at least some of the time)? Amen. Common sense should prevail...but if the employers are 'required' to hire certain groups any flexibility goes out the window. Yeah, its like when GM had lots full of cars they could not move circa 2008, the factories were required to build cars anyway.... how dumb is that? I get the utility of Unions, and how in the past they protected workers against abuses... but I see them as abusive themselves, to the guys the represent and the company they provide labor for.
KD in CA Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Membership dues being spent by New York union bosses on boondoggle to Puerto Rico. Go Unions!!! Edited December 9, 2011 by KD in CT
RkFast Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Membership dues being spent by New York union bosses on boondoggle to Puerto Rico. Go Unions!!! Remember...its the "banksters" taking advantage of the workin' man.
BiggieScooby Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 I'm not sure what you're asking me. Do you take money from unions to spew the ridiculous rhetoric that politicians have been using to bankrupt the middle class taxpayer? You and Palin and all Alaskans get $1000 to live in the ice box. Explains why you are so cheerful. Membership dues being spent by New York union bosses on boondoggle to Puerto Rico. Go Unions!!! Another Murdoch outfit posing as a legitimate news outlet. Love the uncited sources. Do you have anything to say that has some substance to it? Your proclamations are weak and of a feeble nature. I didn't think righties liked to debate. honestly I am open to any debate, let's have at it.
meazza Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 You and Palin and all Alaskans get $1000 to live in the ice box. Explains why you are so cheerful. Are you that dumb? Another Murdoch outfit posing as a legitimate news outlet. Love the uncited sources. So unions aren't corrupt?
IDBillzFan Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Another Murdoch outfit posing as a legitimate news outlet. Love the uncited sources. I'm with you. The entire story has no credibility because even though the trip WAS funded by union dues and the Post WAS there trying to interview the union bosses, it makes perfect sense that they would manufacturer "uncited sources" as being upset because, let's be honest, there's not a single union worker who should be upset by this. And even if they were upset by it, why wouldn't the Post give their names? Unless the workers asked not to have their names printed, and that makes no sense because what do they have to fear by being openly critical of their bosses in the NY Post? I seriously have no idea why everyone finds your logic so unbelievably stupid because it seems so bullet-proof to me. Edited December 9, 2011 by LABillzFan
KD in CA Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Another Murdoch outfit posing as a legitimate news outlet. Love the uncited sources. 'Uncited sources' like pictures of fat guys wearing union shirts laying under palm trees? You are a !@#$ing moron.
BiggieScooby Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 'Uncited sources' like pictures of fat guys wearing union shirts laying under palm trees? You are a !@#$ing moron. I am not the person swearing. Keep on reading Murdoch news and you'll stay a moron.
Doc Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 Let me amend my earlier statement and say that lawyers, liberals and unions, while once useful, have destroyed this once-great country.
Cinga Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 Let me amend my earlier statement and say that lawyers, liberals and unions, while once useful, have destroyed this once-great country. Hear!!!! Hear!!! Especially the lawyer part, knowing about 80% of Congress claims to be attorneys....
Koko78 Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 Hear!!!! Hear!!! Especially the lawyer part, knowing about 80% of Congress claims to be attorneys.... Anyone who dislikes lawyers is a terrorist.
Alaska Darin Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 I am not the person swearing. Keep on reading Murdoch news and you'll stay a moron. Not like you need more company, right? At least you don't curse when you name call, cheerful guy.
Oxrock Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 Not against unions. I'm against MANDATORY membership and MANDATORY use of unions with public money. If unionized companies win a bid fairly, then fine, use them. But no law should be written that requires use of a union contractor. As far as the Puerto Rico vacation vs big bankers, well, let's see which one is claims to represent to workers... certainly bankers never have.
KD in CA Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 I am not the person swearing. Keep on reading Murdoch news and you'll stay a moron. Does someone swearing make you feel more secure in your willful ignorance? Nothing funnier than the "I'm going to pretend facts don't exist because I don't like the web link" defense.
Cinga Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Anyone who dislikes lawyers is a terrorist. Ha!!!! I would list it in reverse...
Koko78 Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Ha!!!! I would list it in reverse... Anyone who dislikes terrorists are lawyers?
Recommended Posts