bills1960 Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 It seems to me that this guy is better fit for a 4-3 Weak side LB? Which sounds good to me. Despite two years in the system, we're STILL better fit for a 4-3. Williams and Dareus in the interior? That sounds good to me. If Upshaw is there, take him and put him a WIll. Make Barnett the Mike (not sure if he's ever played in a 4-3 but I'm sure he can make the adjustment). That sounds a lot better to me.
DrDawkinstein Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) It seems to me that this guy is better fit for a 4-3 Weak side LB? Which sounds good to me. Despite two years in the system, we're STILL better fit for a 4-3. Williams and Dareus in the interior? That sounds good to me. If Upshaw is there, take him and put him a WIll. Make Barnett the Mike (not sure if he's ever played in a 4-3 but I'm sure he can make the adjustment). That sounds a lot better to me. Even though he played his entire college career as a 34 OLB for the consistently best defense in the country? Edited December 9, 2011 by DrDareustein
Bill from NYC Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Even though he played his entire college career as a 34 OLB for the consistently best defense in the country? Upshaw is going to be a very good player imo. Some team will draft him and have a solid player for years.
Simon Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Maybe I've been expecting too much, but I've got to admit that I've been pretty disappointed when I've watched him play.
Recommended Posts