erynthered Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 REALLY!!!!!!! http://nation.foxnews.com/homelessness/2011/12/01/homeless-lady-15-kids-somebody-needs-pay-all-my-children
KD in CA Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Injectable long-term birth control should really be a condition of anyone receiving public assistance.
RkFast Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Its only "fair" that people like this get some of the 1%'s money.
Joe Miner Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 3:53 PM, KD in CT said: Injectable long-term birth control should really be a condition of anyone receiving public assistance. Which caliber of injection do you want? 9mm or .45
Gary M Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 4:29 PM, DaveinElma said: 15 future lifetime Democrat voters. and just think if they continue the tradition!!!
Chef Jim Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 4:45 PM, Gary M said: and just think if they continue the tradition!!! IF??????
erynthered Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 4:45 PM, Gary M said: and just think if they continue the tradition!!! 36 years old with that many kids. Wonder where she learned it from?
/dev/null Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 I love some of the reader comments like: It's a vagina, not a clown car!
Doc Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Stop paying people to have kids! You think she would have squeezed-out 12 kids if she had to pay for them herself?
Kevbeau Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 This is a point of conflict for me. I'm not a fan of gov't planning/interference, but at the same time, if people can't control themselves.... For the record, I don't think withholding money is a viable option if those kids get any shot at a "normal" life.
/dev/null Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 6:35 PM, Kevbeau said: For the record, I don't think withholding money is a viable option if those kids get any shot at a "normal" life. And life in the system is a normal one?
Kevbeau Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 6:42 PM, /dev/null said: And life in the system is a normal one? Hence the quotes. I guess there's always the Oliver Twist route.
DC Tom Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 6:35 PM, Kevbeau said: This is a point of conflict for me. I'm not a fan of gov't planning/interference, but at the same time, if people can't control themselves.... For the record, I don't think withholding money is a viable option if those kids get any shot at a "normal" life. No matter what, at least a third of those kids end up doing hard time. May as well just put them in prison now...it'll be cheaper.
Kevbeau Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 (edited) On 12/1/2011 at 7:12 PM, DC Tom said: No matter what, at least a third of those kids end up doing hard time. May as well just put them in prison now...it'll be cheaper. I wouldn't be suprised if it's more than a third. I thought it would be cheaper to keep them out of prison in the hopes they become somewhat productive, although honestly I haven't looked at the numbers. though one might say we're we're now touching on the larger issue of welfare. Edited December 1, 2011 by Kevbeau
B-Large Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 6:11 PM, Doc said: Stop paying people to have kids! You think she would have squeezed-out 12 kids if she had to pay for them herself? sadly, you wonder if it would make a difference. I am sure there are people out there who would pop out kids and care less if they live on the streets and starve. But be that as is it may, further incentive for this behavior montarily is bad policy
ny33 Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 Incidents like these make me amazed at people who are opposed to abortion and birth control. Most abortions happen in low-income, unemployed "families"- often single mothers- and those kids end up going nowhere. Abortion is, unfortunately but effectively, population control for the children of degenerates.
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 On 12/2/2011 at 8:09 PM, ny33 said: Incidents like these make me amazed at people who are opposed to abortion and birth control. Most abortions happen in low-income, unemployed "families"- often single mothers- and those kids end up going nowhere. Abortion is, unfortunately but effectively, population control for the children of degenerates. What's more amazing is that people that are for abortion are not for forced sterilization. Why not stop it before it happens??
ny33 Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 On 12/2/2011 at 8:19 PM, Chef Jim said: What's more amazing is that people that are for abortion are not for forced sterilization. Why not stop it before it happens?? I don't believe in forced sterilization, but a lot of countries offer incentives for sterilization. Rajasthan, in India, recently began offering cars in exchange for sterilization; various other states in India, which has a massive overpopulation problem, have begun similar campaigns in the last decade. They've been successful; states like Kerala have cut population growth to effectively zero. Unfortunately, the U.S. doesn't have the balls to implement similar programs.
DaveinElma Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 On 12/1/2011 at 6:11 PM, Doc said: Stop paying people to have kids! You think she would have squeezed-out 12 kids if she had to pay for them herself? But they're entitled to some of your money.
Recommended Posts