Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

Alan Pergmanent has a similar take.

 

I saw this tweet by Jerry Sullivan yesterday:

TBNSully Jerry Sullivan

I don't know how anyone could watch that Bobby Davis interview on ESPN, where he breaks down crying, and think he's lying about Bernie Fine.

 

So, watched what I think is the interview he is talking about, and I didn't see any crying. I saw what Whitlock saw - "two vague, mumbling on-camera interviews from Fine’s accusers."

 

Is there another interview that I missed?

 

Here's the Pergmanet article:

http://networkedblogs.com/qkYmB

Posted

Alan Pergmanent has a similar take.

 

I saw this tweet by Jerry Sullivan yesterday:

TBNSully Jerry Sullivan

I don't know how anyone could watch that Bobby Davis interview on ESPN, where he breaks down crying, and think he's lying about Bernie Fine.

 

So, watched what I think is the interview he is talking about, and I didn't see any crying. I saw what Whitlock saw - "two vague, mumbling on-camera interviews from Fine’s accusers."

 

Is there another interview that I missed?

 

Here's the Pergmanet article:

http://networkedblogs.com/qkYmB

 

Yes, I saw the interview with a crying Davis yesterday morning. The interview was split --- breaking news/OTL tease, and then the OTL story, which I believe had the crying.

Posted

i like both of those articles....too many questions that make this story stink to high heaven...one thing that no one seems to be seriously questioning ad nauseum is that the 'mother' said davis never flew to any games, yet davis claims he was at a tourney in hawaii....way way way too many inconsistencies.....

 

Alan Pergmanent has a similar take.

 

I saw this tweet by Jerry Sullivan yesterday:

TBNSully Jerry Sullivan

I don't know how anyone could watch that Bobby Davis interview on ESPN, where he breaks down crying, and think he's lying about Bernie Fine.

 

So, watched what I think is the interview he is talking about, and I didn't see any crying. I saw what Whitlock saw - "two vague, mumbling on-camera interviews from Fine’s accusers."

 

Is there another interview that I missed?

 

Here's the Pergmanet article:

http://networkedblogs.com/qkYmB

Posted

Why is secret service involved?

 

from the little I have read, the secret service only investigates:

'Use of new technology as a means to commit crime' - that doesn't really sound like it would apply to pornography...perhaps it could

mean possible blackmail via email(?).

 

The rest of their jurisdiction appears to involve acts violating the treasury and protection of certain people in our society...

Posted

Why is secret service involved?

 

from the little I have read, the secret service only investigates:

'Use of new technology as a means to commit crime' - that doesn't really sound like it would apply to pornography...perhaps it could

mean possible blackmail via email(?).

 

The rest of their jurisdiction appears to involve acts violating the treasury and protection of certain people in our society...

From your bolded part, possibly child porn on a computer?

Posted

Syracuse should do exactly what Penn St. did, fire Boheim for letting this predator roam their sidelines and abuse their ball boys for over 30 years...what a shame....

 

However very many of you same people who jumped all over Joe Paterno/Penn St./McQuery for their handling of the Sandusky abuses will just defend your little Syracuse basketball program and make the poor abused crack head out to be the real perp. while the monster continues to feed on abusing boys...sadd sadd sadddd how being a fan of one program completely changes your outlook on a situation

 

"I hate Penn St., Sandusky is a monster and everyone should get fired, tarred and feathered"

 

"I love Syracuse, nobody has done anything wrong here! That boy deserved the sexual abuse he got from Fine!"

 

ohhhh the sick double standards....fire away

Posted

what double standards? there has been no grand jury investigation...2 investigations turned up nothing....there are no corroborating witnesses...except a set of step brothers that are both accusers #1 & #2. now we have 3 alleged victims, the 3rd of which has 2 charges against minors against him, and who's own father denies the basic allegations(going to pittsburg, going to a party at fine's house....oh and just to make it all neater...one of the alleged victims was banging the accusee's wife(the same wife that is now on tape saying how she believes her husband is guilty - perhaps a nice convenient story to get out a marriage) and i am certain this tape was disclosed during the first 2 investigations.....if it is proven that bernie fine is guilty, I will stand at the top of Mt. Olympus(the one on su campus) and blast away....until then, this sounds fishier and fishier as the days progress....

 

Syracuse should do exactly what Penn St. did, fire Boheim for letting this predator roam their sidelines and abuse their ball boys for over 30 years...what a shame....

 

However very many of you same people who jumped all over Joe Paterno/Penn St./McQuery for their handling of the Sandusky abuses will just defend your little Syracuse basketball program and make the poor abused crack head out to be the real perp. while the monster continues to feed on abusing boys...sadd sadd sadddd how being a fan of one program completely changes your outlook on a situation

 

"I hate Penn St., Sandusky is a monster and everyone should get fired, tarred and feathered"

 

"I love Syracuse, nobody has done anything wrong here! That boy deserved the sexual abuse he got from Fine!"

 

ohhhh the sick double standards....fire away

Posted

and you probably bleed Orange and blue

 

the ole saying goes "where theres smoke, theres fire"

 

3rd accuser molests children bc he was molested, classic progression

 

how does 3rd accuser know the layout of Fines home if he was never there, like his father insists...I highly doubt that his wife would admit in a taped phone convo (that she didnt know was being taped) that she believed her husband was a pedophile JUST to make herself feel better about sleeping with the guy, I dont get how that makes sense

 

you dont see how you are believing the ACCUSED in this situation b/c its convenient, and b/c you are a fan of that particular team?

 

and where was it reported there were two other investigations that turned up nothing? I honestly havent seen that...all Ive seen is reports that syracuse police have FAILED to act on allegations in the past....perhaps a link and I could become more informed?

Posted

Yeah I absolutely bleed orange...

 

there are lots of old sayings that are horse sh**

 

the wife could have needed a neat little alibi to cover her ass in leaving him...she leaves because she's cheating, she gets no $$..she leaves because he is allegedly fondling kids...she sings all the way to the bank...

 

I support the accused because he was never found to have committed any of these allegations...

 

Let's see what the secret service turns up...at this point i will lay my life savings(don't get excited..i don't have any savings :cry: ) that the secret service is there in their treasury department capacity and not in child porn capacity...i think bernie fine was being shaken down for money, across state lines....

 

there were investigations in 2002 and 2005 that didn't warrant anything going to the grand jury for futher investigation...the police to my knowledge never failed to act on anything..rather, when the charges were brought to them, they, rightfully so(with my limited knowledge of the law) informed the accuser that the statute of limitations were up and there was nothing they could do...

 

syracuse.com is full of related stories...

 

but again, we will wait and see.

 

and you probably bleed Orange and blue

 

the ole saying goes "where theres smoke, theres fire"

 

3rd accuser molests children bc he was molested, classic progression

 

how does 3rd accuser know the layout of Fines home if he was never there, like his father insists...I highly doubt that his wife would admit in a taped phone convo (that she didnt know was being taped) that she believed her husband was a pedophile JUST to make herself feel better about sleeping with the guy, I dont get how that makes sense

 

you dont see how you are believing the ACCUSED in this situation b/c its convenient, and b/c you are a fan of that particular team?

 

and where was it reported there were two other investigations that turned up nothing? I honestly havent seen that...all Ive seen is reports that syracuse police have FAILED to act on allegations in the past....perhaps a link and I could become more informed?

Posted

Yeah I absolutely bleed orange...

 

there are lots of old sayings that are horse sh**

 

the wife could have needed a neat little alibi to cover her ass in leaving him...she leaves because she's cheating, she gets no $$..she leaves because he is allegedly fondling kids...she sings all the way to the bank...

 

I support the accused because he was never found to have committed any of these allegations...

 

Let's see what the secret service turns up...at this point i will lay my life savings(don't get excited..i don't have any savings :cry: ) that the secret service is there in their treasury department capacity and not in child porn capacity...i think bernie fine was being shaken down for money, across state lines....

 

there were investigations in 2002 and 2005 that didn't warrant anything going to the grand jury for futher investigation...the police to my knowledge never failed to act on anything..rather, when the charges were brought to them, they, rightfully so(with my limited knowledge of the law) informed the accuser that the statute of limitations were up and there was nothing they could do...

 

syracuse.com is full of related stories...

 

but again, we will wait and see.

 

the wife wanting to get money theory doesnt hold up since she also cheated, with the very same man (Jerry...Jerry...Jerry)

 

I still havent found anything about 2002 and 2005 investigations, in fact the only thing I found is that the police would not investigate at those times b/c of statute of limitations rules, so they "had no grounds" to investigate, so at both times that accusers came forward in those years, the police said "nah, been to long" (that is NOT an investigation) that is on the espn home page right now under "3rd accuser" link...

 

Sandusky still hasent been found guilty of his charges either, bet you dont feel the same way about his charges (oh yea, because there was no grand jury blah blah, technically both men are still innocent in the eyes of the law)..point is, ya cant call one a dirt bag while going to the mattresses to defend another (and im not saying YOU specifically Poojer, just all in general who were up in arms over the Penn St. scandal but are vehemently singing the praises of Fine)

Posted

However very many of you same people who jumped all over Joe Paterno/Penn St./McQuery for their handling of the Sandusky abuses will just defend your little Syracuse basketball program and make the poor abused crack head out to be the real perp. while the monster continues to feed on abusing boys...sadd sadd sadddd how being a fan of one program completely changes your outlook on a situation

 

"I hate Penn St., Sandusky is a monster and everyone should get fired, tarred and feathered"

 

"I love Syracuse, nobody has done anything wrong here! That boy deserved the sexual abuse he got from Fine!"

 

ohhhh the sick double standards....fire away

 

Making up quotes and criticizing double standard fan reactions that haven't happened yet...congratulations, that might be a first even for the internet. Your obsession with Boeheim is a little scary; did he throw it in your girlfriend?

×
×
  • Create New...