RkFast Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 Can someone smarter than me please explain why FAILey kept a player at a position where he was inept and worse, ran plays that expose the inability even more? Levitre was physically unable to play center. He could not snap the ball. He just couldnt do it. Yet, Gailey continued to run a shotgun formation, exposing Levitre's incompetence even more. And when he finally puts Fitz under center at the goaline.....they run a QB sneak. Did Levitre insult Gaileys mother or something? Unconsionable to me. I can no longer say the Bills are "well coached" after seeing the pathetic decision making yesterday.
RuntheDamnBall Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 Can someone smarter than me please explain why FAILey kept a player at a position where he was inept and worse, ran plays that expose the inability even more? Levitre was physically unable to play center. He could not snap the ball. He just couldnt do it. Yet, Gailey continued to run a shotgun formation, exposing Levitre's incompetence even more. And when he finally puts Fitz under center at the goaline.....they run a QB sneak. Did Levitre insult Gaileys mother or something? Unconsionable to me. I can no longer say the Bills are "well coached" after seeing the pathetic decision making yesterday. I remarked to a friend that it was like watching someone try to take a Camaro off-roading. It was astonishing how long it took them to do something about this - basically until garbage time (unless you want to refer to all but the first three minutes of the game as "garbage time"). If they didn't "lay down" yesterday, they sure as sh-- didn't show a pulse. I hope they get some bodies back, call up some receivers who can catch the ball, and give the Jets everything they've got. Between Gailey's long leash with Edwards, the countless injuries, Fitz's sudden inability to keep his passes from sailing, the receiver dropsies, and the line juggling, I don't know what they've got, really. A month ago seems much further away than it really is.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I like the part where you turned Gailey into Failey. That was really funny!
Dont Stop BILL-ievin' Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 Here is one take (all though i may be stretching it)....The OLine play in the middle in our division is very tough, and Levitre gives us the best chance to win those battles. yesterday, was a warm up vs. the jets, where Urbick will get eaten alive at Center. Unfortunately, the snaps didnt go well. Gailey was likely hoping Levitre would play better there. I think its a situation where he has showed in the past in practices he could play center, but hasnt had reps enough reps this year and it backfired. Bottom line is it's Gailey's fault that we didnt have a suitable answer when the C went down.
PromoTheRobot Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I like the part where you turned Gailey into Failey. That was really funny! From Megamind to FAILey in 3 games. PTR
deep2evans Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 From Megamind to FAILey in 3 games. PTR he never deserved megamind. we were beating up on **** defenses.
Kaz Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 he never deserved megamind. we were beating up on **** defenses. So we only count wins against top-5 defenses as being legit now? Funny how we don't hear from you people when times are good...
deep2evans Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 So we only count wins against top-5 defenses as being legit now? Funny how we don't hear from you people when times are good... haha actually i was here the whole time giving the same speech. probably the reason i got banned 3 times.
Kaz Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 haha actually i was here the whole time giving the same speech. probably the reason i got banned 3 times. Keep telling yourself that. And make sure you're wearing your tin foil hat nice and snug...the Greys can hear your thoughts.
2003Contenders Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I have been wondering the same thing, too. Rich Gannon kept commenting on that all game, even on the somewhat successful first drive. He kept saying that if Fitz had to continuously worry about getting a clean snap, that it would severely interfere with his ability to run the offense. What REALLY bothered me is that Gannon said in pre-game interviews, Fitz and Levitre admitted that there was a problem. The fact that this was a known issue heading into the game and that Chan STILL insisted on rolling with it after it was clearly failing, is unconscionable. I have been a big supporter of Chan's all year, but he just seems like a defeated man. The swagger that was there early on when the expectation to win seems to be gone. I know the injuries have taxed the shallow depth that was on this team, and that he deep down has to know that he is heading into each game with an under-manned crew. However, I just do not like this loser/bullied mentality that has over taken this team.
RkFast Posted November 21, 2011 Author Posted November 21, 2011 From Megamind to FAILey in 3 games. PTR Not me...I NEVER though he was some genius. I thought he was a good coach, however. After yesterdays showing in the second half, Im not so sure anymore. Im not one to typically second guess coaching decisions, but that was terrible. To leave a player who simply cannot play the position at all...and worse....run an offense that is very demanding of that position just defies logic. Im aware he didnt have many alternatives, but he had some. He could have went to a base offense of some sort and put Fitz under center....and he sure as hell DID NOT have to run a QB sneak at the goal line.
reddogblitz Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) I was wondering about this too. During the game I was thinking that we should either abandon the shotgun or bring in someone else if we had anyone else. I was also wondering, why don't we have a backup Center? Do other teams carry a backup Center. Or at least prepare someone in case we need him. Especially when your staring Center is injury riddled like Wood is. Edited November 21, 2011 by reddogblitz
Charles Romes Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I though this was going to be about nick farirley playing bad for the lions. I like the gailey to failey play on words. I think it gas a good chance of catching on.
CSBill Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I have been wondering the same thing, too. Rich Gannon kept commenting on that all game, even on the somewhat successful first drive. He kept saying that if Fitz had to continuously worry about getting a clean snap, that it would severely interfere with his ability to run the offense. What REALLY bothered me is that Gannon said in pre-game interviews, Fitz and Levitre admitted that there was a problem. The fact that this was a known issue heading into the game and that Chan STILL insisted on rolling with it after it was clearly failing, is unconscionable. I have been a big supporter of Chan's all year, but he just seems like a defeated man. The swagger that was there early on when the expectation to win seems to be gone. I know the injuries have taxed the shallow depth that was on this team, and that he deep down has to know that he is heading into each game with an under-manned crew. However, I just do not like this loser/bullied mentality that has over taken this team. I had the exact same thoughts/questions? The problem was known. If the job (one of the jobs) of a coach is to put people in a position where they can be successful, what happened here? It's not like this came from no where . . . just hard to fathom how an NFL team, including players and coach in this case, can consistently look so inept without something changing. I think most of the problems on offense yesterday can be directly attributed to this center-to-OB exchange. If a play cannot start right, it certainly will not finish right. Just untenable!
RkFast Posted November 21, 2011 Author Posted November 21, 2011 I had the exact same thoughts/questions? The problem was known. If the job (one of the jobs) of a coach is to put people in a position where they can be successful, what happened here? It's not like this came from no where . . . just hard to fathom how an NFL team, including players and coach in this case, can consistently look so inept without something changing. I think most of the problems on offense yesterday can be directly attributed to this center-to-OB exchange. If a play cannot start right, it certainly will not finish right. Just untenable! I agree 100% Fitz was off and IMO a HUGE reason for that were the bad snaps. In the second half, they were so off target and slow I think the Fins D-line was able to get just an extra half second jump due to how poor they were.
T master Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 I was wondering about this too. During the game I was thinking that we should either abandon the shotgun or bring in someone else if we had anyone else. I was also wondering, why don't we have a backup Center? Do other teams carry a backup Center. Or at least prepare someone in case we need him. Especially when your staring Center is injury riddled like Wood is. What about Sanborn ? He is our long snapper but at least that's what he does ????????????????
RuntheDamnBall Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 What about Sanborn ? He is our long snapper but at least that's what he does ???????????????? I thought of this yesterday, but then realized how terrifying it would be to have him facing an NFL DT (6-1, 242 - that's fullback size).
Pirate Angel Posted November 21, 2011 Posted November 21, 2011 The announcers stated in the game that Levitre has been struggling long snapping the ball all week....then i thought then why the "F" do we keep lining Fitz up in the shotgun???
Pirate Angel Posted November 22, 2011 Posted November 22, 2011 Ive been a supporter of him and think he deserves a lot of credit for our early success. I believe as the season progressed injuries amounted and defenses adjusted to your scheme you have had your thumb up your a** for two long making adjustments to keep the opposition guessing. - you hired Wannstedt... but yet you keep George Edwards as DC who has to be fired at the end of the season, why wait sh*t can him and try to put a little fire on the defense - start running the 4-3...your linebackers are bad, doesn't it make sense to keep less of them on the field? Kelsay is not a good linebacker but he is a good 4-3 defensive end. We dont have 3-4 nose, Spencer Johnson has played well in spells at 4-3 defensive tackle..let him and Dareus play the middle then rotate the others at the other DE spot - our WR are all banged up yet you insist on running the spread offense, can we not have a 3 RB set with Freddy, CJ, and a very punishing FB in Corey McIntyre? Maybe see some misdirections, reverses, pitches, fakes, something, anything? This would at least limit the amount of picks we throw with an inaccurate QB and balls bouncing off stone hand recievers not mention run some clock to keep our porous defense off the field longer.
Pass the Pipe Posted November 22, 2011 Posted November 22, 2011 After listening to Gailey’s pressers during this November death march, am I the only one that is concerned with his coined response regarding defensive breakdowns: “I have to check the film as I was too busy going over offensive stuff?” This guy is the chief executive officer on game days and only appears to be overseeing half of the operation; I am all for delegation, but he doesn’t seem to have a clue, nor does he care to have a glue about defensive football and we all know the adage that defense wins championships!
Recommended Posts