John Adams Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 1321060693[/url]' post='2308290']That means little, you never have read a book you couldn't have done better on. I couldn't bump this enough.
Magox Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 I wouldn't call him trash. He is probably the top candidate the conservatives have to offer. Very intelligent man, very energetic and you can't challenge his love of country. I highly doubt he could push his plans through Congress, but who can, anyways? Actually he's not the top candidate they can offer, Romney is. Also newt probably would be the candidate who would most be likely to push his plans through, considering his history of compromise with Clinton....without a doubt he is an extremely intelligent man, with loads of substance...he probably from a substantive pov he'd be a good president however his negative polling numbers are sky high, even though they have dropped a little but the caricature of newt has already been placed..so bottom line he can't beat Obama....
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted November 13, 2011 Author Posted November 13, 2011 Actually he's not the top candidate they can offer, Romney is. Also newt probably would be the candidate who would most be likely to push his plans through, considering his history of compromise with Clinton....without a doubt he is an extremely intelligent man, with loads of substance...he probably from a substantive pov he'd be a good president however his negative polling numbers are sky high, even though they have dropped a little but the caricature of newt has already been placed..so bottom line he can't beat Obama.... President newt would lead a crusade against the secular/Muslim/homosexual/fascist/media/elites trying to turn us into a socialist utopia. I mean have you seriously followed how looney this guy is???
Magox Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 Oh and btw board...... Meet Dave, Dave is our board idiot..
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted November 13, 2011 Author Posted November 13, 2011 Oh and btw board...... Meet Dave, Dave is our board idiot.. Pointing out the truth usually brings out the worst in people like you
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 President newt would lead a crusade against the secular/Muslim/homosexual/fascist/media/elites trying to turn us into a socialist utopia. I mean have you seriously followed how looney this guy is??? Morning Dave. Getting stoked for the game today? I know I am. Go Bills!! Oh and BTW quick question for you. What makes Newt trash, an idiot, a parasite and a loony? Just wondering how you game to these conclusions.
Magox Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 (edited) brings out the worst in people Sort of like my ex.... Edited November 13, 2011 by Magox
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted November 13, 2011 Author Posted November 13, 2011 Mitt and Newt, the war candidates! http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57323686-503544/romney-gingrich-at-gop-debate-wed-go-to-war-to-keep-iran-from-getting-nuclear-weapons/ We have to toss thousands of government workers to the curb because we are supposidly broke, but what's a few trillion for another war? Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich said at the Republican presidential debate here Saturday night that they would be willing to go to war to keep Iran from attaining nuclear weapons if all other strategies failed. Well, where are all the "I didn't agree with war in Iraq" Conservative flip floppers who really did agree with the war in Iraq until it was unpopular? Morning Dave. Getting stoked for the game today? I know I am. Go Bills!! Oh and BTW quick question for you. What makes Newt trash, an idiot, a parasite and a loony? Just wondering how you game to these conclusions. Go Bills. Sabres have me feeling sort of down today, but that's how it goes. Oh, did you just miss my making fun of Newt's over the top looney rhetoric?
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 Mitt and Newt, the war candidates! http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57323686-503544/romney-gingrich-at-gop-debate-wed-go-to-war-to-keep-iran-from-getting-nuclear-weapons/ We have to toss thousands of government workers to the curb because we are supposidly broke, but what's a few trillion for another war? Well, where are all the "I didn't agree with war in Iraq" Conservative flip floppers who really did agree with the war in Iraq until it was unpopular? Go Bills. Sabres have me feeling sort of down today, but that's how it goes. Oh, did you just miss my making fun of Newt's over the top looney rhetoric? So keeping a country that has sworn to wipe our number one ally off the map from getting nukes is looney?
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 Oh and btw board...... Meet Dave, Dave is our board idiot.. Sometimes I miss Conner, but Dave fills in nicely. It's just that Dave is a different kind of idiot then Conner. To watch them interact would be world class entertainment.
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 So keeping a country that has sworn to wipe our number one ally off the map from getting nukes is looney? Certainly! Every lib knows that all of the world's problems can be solved with a few kind words read off a teleprompter and a hug.
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 I couldn't bump this enough. Not hard to imagine the 1905 DC Tom panning the publication of special relativity as "Complete clap trap, without merit of any sort. The flaws are much to obvious for me to bother pointing out."
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted November 13, 2011 Author Posted November 13, 2011 So keeping a country that has sworn to wipe our number one ally off the map from getting nukes is looney? We can't afford another war scaremonger
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 We can't afford another war scaremonger Well then let's just do away with the DOD.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted November 13, 2011 Author Posted November 13, 2011 Well then let's just do away with the DOD. Sure, let's just from one extreme to the other
Magox Posted November 13, 2011 Posted November 13, 2011 (edited) Iran situation is very complicated .... On one hand you can't allow them to have nuclear capabilities, the odds of a nuclear arms races occurring in the middle east would dramatically increase, couple that with the hate for the Jews and their rhetoric, at some point nuclear war would be inevitable in that region... However we can't afford another war... I suppose tactical strikes on their facilities and enough boots on the ground to get the job done might be the solution....along with a lot of praying and hoping they the iranese don't attempt to dramatically escalate the war..... Also the Obama strategy with Libya, the lead from behind role may not be a bad idea...something along the lines of using our air capabilities and foreign boots on the ground such as the French or brits Edited November 13, 2011 by Magox
Adam Posted November 14, 2011 Posted November 14, 2011 (edited) Iran situation is very complicated .... On one hand you can't allow them to have nuclear capabilities, the odds of a nuclear arms races occurring in the middle east would dramatically increase, couple that with the hate for the Jews and their rhetoric, at some point nuclear war would be inevitable in that region... However we can't afford another war... I suppose tactical strikes on their facilities and enough boots on the ground to get the job done might be the solution....along with a lot of praying and hoping they the iranese don't attempt to dramatically escalate the war..... Also the Obama strategy with Libya, the lead from behind role may not be a bad idea...something along the lines of using our air capabilities and foreign boots on the ground such as the French or brits Hopefully Israel takes care of it, and we stay out. Certainly! Every lib knows that all of the world's problems can be solved with a few kind words read off a teleprompter and a hug. Not our problem. Let people take care of their own stuff Edited November 14, 2011 by Adam
Magox Posted November 14, 2011 Posted November 14, 2011 Hopefully Israel takes care of it, and we stay out. Not our problem. Let people take care of their own stuff Allowing Israel to take care of it would be a worse option.....unless you are pulling for a regional war....the best strike scenario is to have a joint coalition mission
Adam Posted November 14, 2011 Posted November 14, 2011 Allowing Israel to take care of it would be a worse option.....unless you are pulling for a regional war....the best strike scenario is to have a joint coalition mission Not pulling for anything- I just don't want to be involved. We need to be out of the middle east, not have more entanglements. It would be nice to be able to fix everything, everywhere, but we can't afford the $$$ or personnel
Magox Posted November 14, 2011 Posted November 14, 2011 Not pulling for anything- I just don't want to be involved. We need to be out of the middle east, not have more entanglements. It would be nice to be able to fix everything, everywhere, but we can't afford the $$$ or personnel Yeah well I want worldwide peace and utopian unicorns as a backyard pet, but it's not gonna happen....
Recommended Posts