Astrobot Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Carrington with the tip. Lucky that it's just 0-3
Simon Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Bummer...here comes the reversal. With his hand clearly under the ball, in my mind there's not enough to change an on-field call there
EldaBillsFan Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Not going to say it was a bad call....just don't think the footage was enough to overturn the call on field
NastyMan Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Give that 3 to the Refs...what is undisputable evidence?? Looked like it could have gone either way the call on the field was a pick should have stayed a pick ...good job refs...not!
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 With his hand clearly under the ball, in my mind there's not enough to change an on-field call there Ah, but it is the Jets, so there you go,
jwolf02 Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 You know, there's been enough stoppages in play - injuries, challenges, etc - I think the D won't be as gassed as the probably should be with the T.O.P. difference.
bills_red Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Ticky tack bs. Hand was underneath HOW THE HELL CAN HE CHANGE THE CALL. BS CALL. BS.
BringBackFergy Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 With his hand clearly under the ball, in my mind there's not enough to change an on-field call there Exactly. Not sure what that ref saw but it wasn't clear evidence to overturn ruling on field
NastyMan Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 They just showed it again how was that not an INT
San Jose Bills Fan Posted November 6, 2011 Author Posted November 6, 2011 With his hand clearly under the ball, in my mind there's not enough to change an on-field call there Totally agree. But the Bills are fortunate to be down only 3. C'mon Fitz. Gotta do something here.
NastyMan Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 I want to see more blitzing from the Bills in the second half I would take my chances sending an extra attacker, also so bumping on the line for those recievers would be nice..
truth on hold Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 HOW THE HELL CAN HE CHANGE THE CALL. BS CALL. BS. I agree. Over officiating. Looking for something that wasn't there I want to see more blitzing from the Bills in the second half I would take my chances sending an extra attacker, also so bumping on the line for those recievers would be nice.. I'd play it the other way. Stop biting on fakes. Keep the play in front and defenders get hands up to block passes
San Jose Bills Fan Posted November 6, 2011 Author Posted November 6, 2011 Plenty of time… but they have to stretch the field somehow regardless of time.
Simon Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 Totally agree. But the Bills are fortunate to be down only 3. C'mon Fitz. Gotta do something here. If we were getting the 2nd half kickoff I'd be running for the locker room right now, thrilled with a 3 point game.
Recommended Posts