Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am sure you read this somewhere  :devil:  :devil:  ;)

174579[/snapback]

 

Actually, he absorbed the information out of the atmosphere via osmosis

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
By the way...is it a white cat with blue eyes?  Because white cats with blue eyes are deaf.  (Yes, seriously...what's more, a white cat with one blue eye is deaf in the one ear opposite that eye.  Funny little bit of feline genetic trivia.)

174504[/snapback]

 

Wow, it seems you know quite a bit about pussies. :devil:

Posted
By the way...is it a white cat with blue eyes?  Because white cats with blue eyes are deaf.  (Yes, seriously...what's more, a white cat with one blue eye is deaf in the one ear opposite that eye.  Funny little bit of feline genetic trivia.)

174504[/snapback]

 

There are times when I don't admit I actually know you.

 

This is one of those times.

Posted
Wow, it seems you know quite a bit about pussies.    :devil:

174636[/snapback]

 

Read this !@#$ing cesspool of a message board for seven years, and you'll be acquainted with more than a few of them yourself... :devil:

Posted
Read this !@#$ing cesspool of a message board for seven years, and you'll be acquainted with more than a few of them yourself...  :devil:

174670[/snapback]

 

 

Send him over to the PPP board. More pussies over there than at the SPCA.

Posted
There are times when I don't admit I actually know you.

 

This is one of those times.

174651[/snapback]

 

Yeah...but on the other hand, when I mentioned reading about the mid-life upgrade to the RAF Tornado fleet, you didn't bat an eye. It makes one suspect that maybe your opinions on my hobbies are...well...not all there themselves. :devil::devil:

Posted
Yeah...but on the other hand, when I mentioned reading about the mid-life upgrade to the RAF Tornado fleet, you didn't bat an eye.  It makes one suspect that maybe your opinions on my hobbies are...well...not all there themselves.  :devil:  :devil:

174683[/snapback]

 

And I've also dumped my third Yak of the night.

 

So there!

Posted

Ok, Ok...you want me to share the yak too. We're already on our second goat, and I'm a plank owner, but someone told me it's Christmas...

Posted
And I've also dumped my third Yak of the night.

 

So there!

174690[/snapback]

 

With or without the oil coolers under the fuselage? Not like it matters...the best aces flew P-39s anyway...

Posted
With or without the oil coolers under the fuselage?  Not like it matters...the best aces flew P-39s anyway...

174720[/snapback]

 

You are once again discounting the P-40 D field mods. The fun scenario is actually Hurricanes against Hurricanes, which DID happen.

Posted
You are once again discounting the P-40 D field mods. The fun scenario is actually Hurricanes against Hurricanes, which DID happen.

174740[/snapback]

 

No, I'm not...but the Russians LOVED the P-39 for air-to-air stuff. Suited their doctrine and tactics very well, even better than the P-40. Used it right up to the end of the war.

 

Hurricanes vs. Hurricanes...would be Finns vs. Russians. There were probably other odd encounters like that...Brewster Buffalo vs. P-40, for example.

Posted
No, I'm not...but the Russians LOVED the P-39 for air-to-air stuff.  Suited their doctrine and tactics very well, even better than the P-40.  Used it right up to the end of the war. 

 

Hurricanes vs. Hurricanes...would be Finns vs. Russians.  There were probably other odd encounters like that...Brewster Buffalo vs. P-40, for example.

174747[/snapback]

 

Yes, Fins on Russians. Good catch.

 

Who besides you and me knows or cares?

 

Of course, I've been lately refering back to Clausowitz.

Posted
Yes, Fins on Russians. Good catch.

 

Who besides you and me knows or cares?

 

Of course, I've been lately refering back to Clausowitz.

174768[/snapback]

 

Probaby...no one, I'd guess. Hell, how many people know what we're talking about?

 

Not Clausowitz. Von Clausewitz.

 

And you arguably have a use for it. Now, when I refer back to Clausewitz... :devil:

Posted
Probaby...no one, I'd guess.  Hell, how many people know what we're talking about? 

 

Not Clausowitz.  Von Clausewitz. 

 

And you arguably have a use for it.  Now, when I refer back to Clausewitz...  :devil:

174773[/snapback]

 

You catch my drift, though. Sorry for my spelling.

 

It's a wonderful world, ain't it?.

×
×
  • Create New...