The Avenger Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 So all the media here in the Boston area are proclaiming that the Pats are now "tied atop the AFC East with Buffalo" - too bad they're not actually tied. We have the same record, but the Bills have a better AFC East record and, oh yeah, the BILLS BEAT THE PATS HEAD TO HEAD. Saying the Bills and Pats are tied is like saying I am tied with Bruce Smith for sacks this year....
PaattMaann Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 I actually think you have had a better year than bruuuuuuceeeeee, not career though, sorry...thats a different story
BuffOrange Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Show me when a team won a tiebreaker vs a division opponent for winning the 1st of 2 meetings; until then stop whining about this.
Captain Caveman Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Yeah, tiebreakers don't get used until after week 17, so it's a little early to complain about this kind of thing IMO.
Fan in Chicago Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Show me when a team won a tiebreaker vs a division opponent for winning the 1st of 2 meetings; until then stop whining about this. Considering there hasn't been a second meeting yet, what the OP states is exactly right - at this point, the Bills are at the top of the AFCE.
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 (edited) Show me when a team won a tiebreaker vs a division opponent for winning the 1st of 2 meetings; until then stop whining about this. Yea but using that same logic we can state that no team ever made the playoffs with a 5-2 record either...therefore by default the patriots are not tied with the Bills for anything until after week 17. If we are going to say "so and so is atop this division right now" then we need to consider what tiebreakers would be used right now. Granted, the Patriots will have an opportunity to even up the season series. But the Bills have an equal opportunity of winning the series 2-0. So that point is utterly moot in my opinion. Edited October 31, 2011 by SouthGeorgiaBillsFan
The Big Cat Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Does it really matter at this point? Well, there's right and there's wrong. To say the Patriots are tied with the Bills is wrong. To say the Patriots are anything BUT second in the AFCE is wrong. I believe that was the OP's point.
Dorkington Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 There is a reason it's called a "tie breaker", that means we are tied with the Pats, and we win the tie breaker. Same record = tied.
Fan in Chicago Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Here is a link to the tie-breaker rules: http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures Ofcourse these are applicable at the end of the season to determine playoffs, but as it stands right now, we have beaten the Pats*. Conference record is 3-1 for the Bills and 4-2 for the Pats*. I say, the Bills lead the Pats* in the AFCE. Not sure what the argument is about.
nucci Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Well, there's right and there's wrong. To say the Patriots are tied with the Bills is wrong. To say the Patriots are anything BUT second in the AFCE is wrong. I believe that was the OP's point. ok, fair enough but no big deal to me.
Captain Hindsight Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Show me when a team won a tiebreaker vs a division opponent for winning the 1st of 2 meetings; until then stop whining about this. We also have a better AFC record. We lost the Bengals and the Giants (NFC) They have lost to that Powerhouse BillS! tean and the Steelers
BuffaloWings Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 This argument is only good for bragging rights. It's nice to say the Bills are in first place right now, but it means nothing after 7 games.
miserable_fan Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Let's beat the Jets next week and make that an even stronger lead with the 2-0 divisional record
White Linen Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 The only issue I would have is if they had the Patriots ahead of us on a standings chart. They don't, so technically they have it right. In saying that, I don't have any issue with the general statement that we are tied with them.
Charles Romes Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Boston Globe has us in first place as meaningless as that is this time of year. http://stats.boston.com/fb/totalstandings.asp
The Big Cat Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 This argument is only good for bragging rights. It's nice to say the Bills are in first place right now, but it means nothing after 7 games. There's no argument to be had. If the Boston MEDIA is saying the Patriots are tied for the lead in the AFCE they are flat out WRONG.
Cash Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Does it really matter at this point? No. Also, "tiebreakers", by definition, are used to break ties. So we definitely are tied. If the tiebreaker was applied, that would break the tie, but until that happens, it's a tie.
nucci Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Our own paper can't put us 1st! http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx?c=buffalonews&page=nfl/stand/standings.aspx?conf=AFC
Drey Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 Our own paper can't put us 1st! http://64.246.64.33/merge/tsnform.aspx?c=buffalonews&page=nfl/stand/standings.aspx?conf=AFC Ok, that's just wrong.
Recommended Posts