3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 http://www.nbclosangeles.com/entertainment/celebrity/Madonnas-Brother-Homeless-Living-Under-Bridge-in-Michigan-132429508.html Who's to say what the real circumstances are, but couldn't this compassionate liberal who donates to democrats at least give her brother a helping hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) http://www.nbclosangeles.com/entertainment/celebrity/Madonnas-Brother-Homeless-Living-Under-Bridge-in-Michigan-132429508.html Who's to say what the real circumstances are, but couldn't this compassionate liberal who donates to democrats at least give her brother a helping hand? Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! Edited October 24, 2011 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! I think the fact that he's homeless because he lost his job at his father's company probably tells us all we need to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2011 Author Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! Maybe he is a Marxist OWS person. Now how do you feel about it? I would venture to guess that she has given plenty of free rides. Edited October 24, 2011 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! So you only help people you like? The hypocritcal compassion of the left continues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! Other than "the 99%". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Maybe her brother is a !@#$ tard Tea Partier? You don't know, neither do I...I would think you would be proud of Madonna..nobody rides for free! Wow, you just outed yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I think the fact that he's homeless because he lost his job at his father's company probably tells us all we need to know. I don't know any of the specifics here, but for a father to fire a son, generally it has to rise above mere incompetence. If the thing was just that he sucked at sales, that usually means a move to middle management where he can't do much harm. And if it were alcohol or drugs, a stay in rehab / treatment would make more sense, given how it works in these families. Instead, he was outright fired and kicked into the street... which gets one thinking theft/embezzlement. Again, this is just reading the tea leaves / between the lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I don't know any of the specifics here, but for a father to fire a son, generally it has to rise above mere incompetence. If the thing was just that he sucked at sales, that usually means a move to middle management where he can't do much harm. And if it were alcohol or drugs, a stay in rehab / treatment would make more sense, given how it works in these families. Instead, he was outright fired and kicked into the street... which gets one thinking theft/embezzlement. Again, this is just reading the tea leaves / between the lines. Sometimes it's hard to remember to wear pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 "My family turned back on me when I was having a hard time," is a common euphemism for "My family finally got tired of my drug/alcohol issues, which I've been unable to beat." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) So you only help people you like? The hypocritcal compassion of the left continues. You are such a drama queen... This would be hilarious if I didn't know you were serious. Other than "the 99%". When did it go to 99%? I thought the non-paying, free-loaders were only 47%...somebody better tell the other 52%, they are going to be even more pissed... Edited October 24, 2011 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 You are such a drama queen... This would be hilarious if I didn't know you were serious. When did it go to 99%? I thought the non-paying, free-loaders were only 47%...somebody better tell the other 52%, they are going to be even more pissed... I would say out of the "99%" crowd, at least 90% fall in the "47%" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 "My family turned back on me when I was having a hard time," is a common euphemism for "My family finally got tired of my drug/alcohol issues, which I've been unable to beat I refuse to acknowledge." Adjusted accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Adjusted accordingly. And correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2011 Author Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) I would say out of the "99%" crowd, at least 90% fall in the "47%" Ah, I see you work for our present administration. That was Crayonz worthy. Edited October 24, 2011 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) Ah, I see you work for our present administration. That was Crayonz worthy. Jeez, do i have to tell you how big of an idiot you are? read it again ... Putz Edited October 24, 2011 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2011 Author Share Posted October 24, 2011 Jeez, do i have to tell you how big of an idiot you are? read it again ... Putz I guess it depends upon how you are defining the "99%" crowd. If you are just referring to the ones at the protests your math is probably correct, or at least could certainly be correct. If you are referring to the "99%" of America it absolutely can't be correct. I took it the latter way. I guess you meant the former. And to think I gave you credit for a Crayonz worthy post when in reality it was just a run of the mill, ordinary, non spectacular blah kind of post. Sorry for interpreting your post incorrectly and giving you credit for something you are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 You are such a drama queen... This would be hilarious if I didn't know you were serious. No what's hilarious is that I was easy to assume that you were serious about your remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 No what's hilarious is that I was easy to assume that you were serious about your remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I guess it depends upon how you are defining the "99%" crowd. If you are just referring to the ones at the protests your math is probably correct, or at least could certainly be correct. If you are referring to the "99%" of America it absolutely can't be correct. I took it the latter way. I guess you meant the former. And to think I gave you credit for a Crayonz worthy post when in reality it was just a run of the mill, ordinary, non spectacular blah kind of post. Sorry for interpreting your post incorrectly and giving you credit for something you are not. I don't give a **** how you interpret it, you're still a putz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts