Jump to content

Bills Hire Firm for Stadium Facelift


CBD

Recommended Posts

Do you seriously think that when Wilson passes on, the new ownership will think "we can't move the team now, they just made improvements to the stadium?"

The other way to look at it is that if (and when) NYS ends up putting $80-100 million into it, they will have serious assurances the team is not going anywhere. That's part of all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wish the Bills or Erie County would find more uses for the stadium. All that money to use it 8-10 days per year seems like such a waste. A number of other teams have major college programs nearby that use their stadiums.

 

It would be nice, but to have more uses for the stadium it would have to be enclosed. Also UB is a long way from a major college program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kansas City just completed a 350 million overhaul of Arrowhead, which I consider the closest stadium to RWS in the league. The upgrade was funded by taxes, so I would expect that the same will be applicable in this case. Recent talk has any upgrade for RWS in the 75-100 million range. I would like to see a poll as to how many would be for or against a tax of this sort.

 

With names of those who are against it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, the grassy knoll theory in all of this is that they want to bring in this committee or company or whatever it is, and have them toss out a really high estimate of the amount of money it would take. Then they could say, "gee, if it's gonna be that much, we might as well build a new stadium" and start down that road. Taxpayers, keep your hand on your wallet if that should happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collins just said they ran a study and the Bills generate $20 mil a year in direct revenues for the state. $100 million in upgrades for a 10 year lease is a bargain. When people start complaining about this, it honestly makes me wonder why Wilson keeps the team here after all. $100 mil? There's a group on the west coast that would throw a $1 billion dollar stadium at the team.

Confirming what Collins said:

 

http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/article601613.ece

 

Collins again emphasized the state's sizable commitment would be worthwhile. He said research done by his office indicates the Bills provide the state with $20 million in direct revenues each year, mainly from taxes on payroll and ticket sales.

 

The Bills' current lease was signed in 1997 and included $63.2 million in state-funded capital improvements, about $3 million a year from a "working capital grant" and other state money.

 

For comparison, here's what a study found the last time around, in 1997, before the current lease was signed:

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/1997/06/09/story4.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirming what Collins said:

 

http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/article601613.ece

 

 

 

For comparison, here's what a study found the last time around, in 1997, before the current lease was signed:

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/1997/06/09/story4.html

:wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: and :wallbash:

 

jw

Edited by john wawrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not you.

 

Still wouldn't be you.

 

 

You're wrong again. The county wants the state to cover 2/3 to 3/4 of the renovation. So that means Bills fans (and nonfans) who actually live in the state will contribute.

 

 

Here is my brief analysis of the Bills stadium improvements situation.

 

Buffalo Bills Payroll $100,000,000

NYS Income Tax 5%

Annual total. $5,000,000

 

73,000 seats x 10 games x $60ave ticket price = $43,800,000

NYS Sales Tax 8.75%

Annual total $3,832,500

 

Total annual tax revenues $8,832,500

 

15 years X $8,832,500

Total of tax revenues over 15 years

$132,487,500

 

NYS issues a 15 year bond for improvements in exchange for a 15 year unbreakable lease with the elimination of the Toronto game.

 

Tax revenues more than pay for the cost of improvements plus interest.

 

Without the improvements the team is gone and so are the tax revenues.

 

This is a revenue neutral deal that could keep the team here after Ralph's passing

 

I also feel my figures are very conservative.

That's a very intersting analysis, but the that's not how it works. If it was, I would be asking the state to fund improvements in my house based on all of the revenue they have been taking from me over the past 25 years--and how much they will be taking from me the next 15 or so.

 

If the Bills have brought in 100 million or so in tax revenue the PAST 15 years, by your logic that money should be available for upgrades right now. Of course it's already long spent on other things the state spends money on. The $134,000,000 you estimate over the next 15 years is not "extra" revenue--it is what the state has already budgeted for and expects to receive form the Bills. If they essentially gave that money back to the Bills for stadium improvements that don't bring more tax revenue than they do now, they would view this as a 134 million shortfall over 15 years.

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish the Bills or Erie County would find more uses for the stadium. All that money to use it 8-10 days per year seems like such a waste. A number of other teams have major college programs nearby that use their stadiums.

It is a criminal waste of money given the current state of the economy. It is shameful and disgusting that taxpayers continue to foot the Bill for these millionaires and billionaires (NFL).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're wrong again. The county wants the state to cover 2/3 to 3/4 of the renovation. So that means Bills fans (and nonfans) who actually live in the state will contribute.

If true, this is actually better than just sticking Erie County with the bill. And it's no different than non-Yankees and Mets fans having to contribute to the building of those stadiums, and this bill won't even approach those two. Although it does mean you now have to pay something to watch games that were otherwise free on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If true, this is actually better than just sticking Erie County with the bill. And it's no different than non-Yankees and Mets fans having to contribute to the building of those stadiums, and this bill won't even approach those two. Although it does mean you now have to pay something to watch games that were otherwise free on TV.

 

Yes, as I said.

 

"Not you" refers to you-perhaps that's what you meant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a criminal waste of money given the current state of the economy. It is shameful and disgusting that taxpayers continue to foot the Bill for these millionaires and billionaires (NFL).

 

Granted, but let's not overlook that these are important venues for things other than football.

 

Stadiums have served as major staging areas in times of natural disaster --- The Superdome during Katrina, a UConn football game was re-scheduled when the state used Rentschler Field during major Hurricane Irene flooding a couple of months ago, only as two examples off the top of my head. God forbid, in the case of nuclear or widespread biological attack, the state/fed government would be using this high-capacity space as treatment centers, etc. It may never have to be used for something like this stuff, but it's a great help to have a facility like that in place if needed. That's why governments generally kick into funding. I suppose they could use eminent domain in times of emergency but an understood "the govt helped pay for this" is a friendlier persuasion.

 

Now, I'm not saying that govt should foot the whole or even most of the bill. But the point here is that stadiums do serve functions other than football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really need to follow, Green Bay's lead on remodeling the Stadium.

 

They made it a year round venue.

 

They have restaurants a HOF and conference rooms that local business can reserve YEAR ROUND!

 

This allows the team and the State to generate revenue year round.

 

I think local Businesses would line up to "off sights" and the Raloh,

 

You get on field tour, catering, and conference rooms.

 

Its a no brainer.

 

It doesn't appear people read to the end of the article (shocker :w00t: )

 

Our own Scott Radecic is the head architect on the project. There may be a heavy emphasis on Special Teams in the redesign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really need to follow, Green Bay's lead on remodeling the Stadium.

 

They made it a year round venue.

 

They have restaurants a HOF and conference rooms that local business can reserve YEAR ROUND!

 

This allows the team and the State to generate revenue year round.

 

I think local Businesses would line up to "off sights" and the Raloh,

 

You get on field tour, catering, and conference rooms.

 

Its a no brainer.

 

It doesn't appear people read to the end of the article (shocker :w00t: )

 

Our own Scott Radecic is the head architect on the project. There may be a heavy emphasis on Special Teams in the redesign.

 

 

Just think, Weddings and receptions at "The Ralph".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're wrong again. The county wants the state to cover 2/3 to 3/4 of the renovation. So that means Bills fans (and nonfans) who actually live in the state will contribute.

 

 

 

That's a very intersting analysis, but the that's not how it works. If it was, I would be asking the state to fund improvements in my house based on all of the revenue they have been taking from me over the past 25 years--and how much they will be taking from me the next 15 or so.

 

If the Bills have brought in 100 million or so in tax revenue the PAST 15 years, by your logic that money should be available for upgrades right now. Of course it's already long spent on other things the state spends money on. The $134,000,000 you estimate over the next 15 years is not "extra" revenue--it is what the state has already budgeted for and expects to receive form the Bills. If they essentially gave that money back to the Bills for stadium improvements that don't bring more tax revenue than they do now, they would view this as a 134 million shortfall over 15 years.

True, its not extra money, but it is money that wouldn't be there if the Bills left town. If they want to keep that revenue stream open and continue to receive that, they need to be willing to invest it in upgrades to keep the stadium close to being up-to-date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granted, but let's not overlook that these are important venues for things other than football.

 

* * * * * * * * *

 

Now, I'm not saying that govt should foot the whole or even most of the bill. But the point here is that stadiums do serve functions other than football.

Sadly, even the Taliban found them useful:

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/09/13/us-afghan-stadium-idUSSP12564220080913

 

But try as they might, few Afghans can put behind them the brutality of the Taliban years when men, and sometimes cowering women in their pale blue, all-enveloping burqas, were brought into the stadium to be either stoned or shot dead at close range.

 

Others had limbs amputated for crimes ranging from robbery to adultery and murder.

 

The stands would be full of people, including children, either coming of their own volition or brought in to witness how the Taliban enforced its version of justice.

 

http://www.rawa.org/murder-w.htm

Edited by ICanSleepWhenI'mDead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think local Businesses would line up to "off sights" and the Raloh,

 

You get on field tour, catering, and conference rooms.

 

Its a no brainer.

 

 

Just think, Weddings and receptions at "The Ralph".

You can....

 

http://www.eventective.com/USA/New+York/Orchard+Park/26918/Ralph-Wilson-Stadium-Home-of-the-Buffalo-Bills.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...