Homer Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 Hard to believe that Hall of Famer Ralph Wilson only has 4 sacks less than the Bills. He'd be great as a rush LB and he's only 93.
Typical TBD Guy Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 Hard to believe that Hall of Famer Ralph Wilson only has 4 sacks less than the Bills. He'd be great as a rush LB and he's only 93. Agreed. Also, Al Davis contributed as much as Merriman last Sunday. Put Ralph at the Sam LB spot and Al's corpse at the Mike LB spot, and we will likely break even in sack productivity.
Meathead Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 the walker counts as part of the body so id like to see him use it on a head shiver to get around the corner
Homer Posted October 18, 2011 Author Posted October 18, 2011 I hear his cane gives him that extra reach to get to the QB.
BringBackFlutie Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 !!! I can see the posts right now- "Is Buddy sleeping? Sign Ralph!"
dwight in philly Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 i feel uncomfortable when the word sack(s) is used in the same sentence with a 90 yr old something man.
ieatcrayonz Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 i feel uncomfortable when the word sack(s) is used in the same sentence with a 90 yr old something man. I don't get it.
AReed Deep For 7 Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 I don't get it. He means testicles , not tackling the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage.
ieatcrayonz Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 He means testicles , not tackling the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage. No because he put a "k" in the word.
Recommended Posts