FreakPop Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 These 2 are absolutely useless. Haven't a clue and yelling at callers. Wow
BuffOrange Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 No, they're right. Standard tard football fan blaming coaches and giving players the free pass. Remember all those posts about the Bills throwing in a tie game vs. NE? Yah me neither.
zonabb Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 These 2 are absolutely useless. Haven't a clue and yelling at callers. Wow Stop listening. Turn on 97 and be done with it. Schopp is a Bills hater and Sabres lover (here's my prediciton on his beloved Sabres... no Stanley Cup with Miller... he's overrated and incapable). And Bullfrog knows he's incapaable of matching wits with Schopp so he just agrees all the time. It's a joke of a radio station. Add in the drunks who call in and it's worthless.
Bangarang Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 The callers that are calling in are morons. Schopp and Bulldog are actually making sense right now.
FreakPop Posted October 16, 2011 Author Posted October 16, 2011 No, they're right. Standard tard football fan blaming coaches and giving players the free pass. Remember all those posts about the Bills throwing in a tie game vs. NE? Yah me neither. They weren't already in field goal range against NE. Big difference!
BuffaloBillsForever Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 I actually agree with them here...lol. Play calling wasn't the problem. The play just wasn't executed by the QB. 1 on 1 coverage, wr beats his man. QB just underthrew it. If we run it, people complain Chan Gailey is Dick Jauron, if we throw it we should have been killing the clock. Pretty easy to be critical in hindsight. The only thing to be critical with that play is Fitzy. Even in hindsight I actually don't mind the aggressive mentality of the play calling. Its who Chan Gailey and our offense is. We spread the ball out.
bills44 Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 They weren't already in field goal range against NE. Big difference! just a minor inconvenient fact....
meazza Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 I actually agree with them here...lol. Play calling wasn't the problem. The play just wasn't executed by the QB. 1 on 1 coverage, wr beats his man. QB just underthrew it. If we run it, people complain Chan Gailey is Dick Jauron, if we throw it we should have been killing the clock. Pretty easy to be critical in hindsight. The only thing to be critical with that play is Fitzy. Even in hindsight I actually don't mind the aggressive mentality of the play calling. Its who Chan Gailey and our offense is. We spread the ball out. Perhaps we shouldn't be as aggresive on the road?
FreakPop Posted October 16, 2011 Author Posted October 16, 2011 just a minor inconvenient fact.... I know, Schopp and his puppet have got to be the dumbest twits to ever host a radio show. Their representation of Buffalo sports is atrocious and an embarrassment to anyone who hears them that is not from Buffalo.
BuffOrange Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 just a minor inconvenient fact.... Equally as minor and inconvenient is that keeping the clock running was more advantageous in the NE game where there was only 2 minutes left, vs. today where there was 4 minutes left.... But of course with our steel curtain defense 3 minutes wouldn't have been enough time for a Giants drive.
bills44 Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 Equally as minor and inconvenient is that keeping the clock running was more advantageous in the NE game where there was only 2 minutes left, vs. today where there was 4 minutes left.... But of course with our steel curtain defense 3 minutes wouldn't have been enough time for a Giants drive. Against NE, Bills got the ball with about 3:30 left from their own 20. Pretty sure they're not going to run the ball into FG range. Fitz threw a deep ball to Donald Jones (said to be the Bills' fastest WR, and didn't play today), then followed it up with a screen and a short pass to FJ. 2 fairly low-risk throws. Absolutely terrible comparison.
ofiba Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 Equally as minor and inconvenient is that keeping the clock running was more advantageous in the NE game where there was only 2 minutes left, vs. today where there was 4 minutes left.... But of course with our steel curtain defense 3 minutes wouldn't have been enough time for a Giants drive. The ball was on the 26 or so, right? The Bills couldn't have killed 4 minutes with 2 first downs?
FreakPop Posted October 16, 2011 Author Posted October 16, 2011 Equally as minor and inconvenient is that keeping the clock running was more advantageous in the NE game where there was only 2 minutes left, vs. today where there was 4 minutes left.... But of course with our steel curtain defense 3 minutes wouldn't have been enough time for a Giants drive. I dunno, chances are better with a 3 point lead and less than 3 minutes to go than a tie game and the Giants 4 minutes to go. I'll take the lead and less time for the Giants.
BuffOrange Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 (edited) Against NE, Bills got the ball with about 3:30 left from their own 20. Pretty sure they're not going to run the ball into FG range. Fitz threw a deep ball to Donald Jones (said to be the Bills' fastest WR, and didn't play today), then followed it up with a screen and a short pass to FJ. 2 fairly low-risk throws. Absolutely terrible comparison. I'm not talking about the Jones play I'm talking about the Spiller play, where they went empty backfield at 2 minutes. Realizing that intermediate throws over the middle are never picked off and there is only one option for the QB on every 5wide empty backfield play, I'm sure you'd still think it was a terrible comparison if the LB didn't blitz on the Spiller play, making Fitz throw somewhere else. Good God. Edited October 16, 2011 by BuffOrange
bills44 Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 (edited) I'm not talking about the Jones play I'm talking about the Spiller play, where they went empty backfield at 2 minutes. Realizing that intermediate throws over the middle are never picked off and there is only one option for the QB on every 5wide empty backfield play, I'm sure you'd still think it was a terrible comparison if the LB didn't blitz on the Spiller play, making Fitz throw somewhere else. Good God. yeah, you did a wonderful job of putting words into my mouth. any way you want to spin it, the throw on the "Spiller play" was far less dangerous than the play to SJ today. are you guy who gets all upset when people criticize Peter King? Edited October 16, 2011 by bills44
HurlyBurly51 Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 Stop listening. Turn on 97 and be done with it. Schopp is a Bills hater and Sabres lover (here's my prediciton on his beloved Sabres... no Stanley Cup with Miller... he's overrated and incapable). And Bullfrog knows he's incapaable of matching wits with Schopp so he just agrees all the time. It's a joke of a radio station. Add in the drunks who call in and it's worthless. No need to bash Miller. Incapable?!
eme123 Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 WGR is covering the Bills right now. I thought for sure they would be still in post game Sabres mode
BillsFanNC Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 Fitz made a bad throw. End of story. Everyone can debate play calls etc., but the play was there and Fitz botched the throw and we lose as a result. I'm not calling for his head like other morons, this is the style of offense Gailey and co. brings to the table. Move on to the bye at 4-2 and look to beating the Skins.
BuffOrange Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 yeah, you did a wonderful job of putting words into my mouth. any way you want to spin it, the throw on the "Spiller play" was far less dangerous than the play to SJ today. are you guy who gets all upset when people criticize Peter King? "Putting words in your mouth" and "spin" - that's a nice cop-out. So you agree there was more than one option for the QB on the empty backfield Jackson throw and that he might've thrown to a deeper WR if the Pats didn't blitz. OK then, great, so now your busted argument makes even less sense. Inasmuch as I think Peter King is a pretty generic analyst who doesn't offer much insight, I've never been "all upset" about anyone criticizing him. I have pointed out that he picked us to the SB in one of the Bledsoe years in response to the "no respect" crowd who think he has some vendetta against Buffalo. Sorry that obviously made you 'all upset' as you somehow remember this 3 years later.
John Cocktosten Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 The title of this thread should say, "Wow Schopp, Bulldog and 90% of the callers are stupid"
Recommended Posts