Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How can people so confidently say that we could have easily ran the ball and run out the clock?

 

So exactly who are all these people who have confidently said that we could have easily ran the ball and run out the clock?

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Aside from FJax 80 yard run, he had 15 carries for 41 yards. That's 2.7 ypc. How can people so confidently say that we could have easily ran the ball and run out the clock? And how much clock do you expect to burn being just outside the red zone? Especially since the Giants still had 2 time outs remaining.

 

 

bingo

Posted

Baloney

 

 

I can't imagine its all that hard to anticipate a recurrence of something that had happened a few minutes previously.

You don't have to be Nostradamus :P

 

As stated, with a supposed second coach out there at QB, I am shocked that in such an important situation, he would duplicate his earlier mistake. That mistake was not due to physical limitations, the same way if Jackson were to fumble, that'd be on him and not the play call. I like the play call. The risk outweighed the reward in that case. Only horrible execution by Fitzpatrick would cost us in that case. And horrible execution is what we got.

Posted

as Simon said, it didn't have to be FJ running the ball. Safe passes - screens, something short to Chandler - may have worked as well

 

How is a short screen or short pass to Chandler better than what play we ran? Stevie was open. It was just a bad throw. A "safe pass" like a screen can easily lose yardage or result in a fumble. How is that better than what happened?

 

So exactly who are all these people who have confidently said that we could have easily ran the ball and run out the clock?

 

Are you not paying attention? Several people are saying we should have run the ball with 4 minutes left and try and burn some time off the clock.

Posted (edited)

How is a short screen or short pass to Chandler better than what play we ran? Stevie was open. It was just a bad throw. A "safe pass" like a screen can easily lose yardage or result in a fumble. How is that better than what happened?

Agreed.

 

Both screens we ran actually worked but they were both a bit of an adventure.

 

There was a lot of traffic and some definite potential for disaster on both screens. Almost every week it seems a botched screen is returned for a TD.

 

The play call was safe… Fitz needs to lay it out there and if not complete it, miss long.

 

It was single coverage.

 

I think the criticism of the play call is way off.

Edited by San Jose Bills Fan
Posted

Are you not paying attention? Several people are saying we should have run the ball with 4 minutes left and try and burn some time off the clock.

 

And which of them are "confidently saying that we could have easily ran the ball and run out the clock"?

Just you straw dude....

Posted

I don't understand the posters who think it was a bad play to go for the endzone. If you execute, you're up 7 with 3 minutes to go, you give the D a chance to preserve the win for you, and you're in a situation where it would be very hard to lose in regulation. Not to mention its an Eli Manning lead team trying to go 80 yards for the tie. Eli is very caplable of doing Eli Manning type things.

 

And its not like Chan was asking Fitz to throw into triple coverage; Fitz had Stevie by a full two steps. Any NFL-caliber quarterback should be able to make that throw.

 

I would have taken my chances with an up 7 with 3 to go situation every single time.

Posted

as Simon said, it didn't have to be FJ running the ball. Safe passes - screens, something short to Chandler - may have worked as well

 

This hindsight is a real great thing. The fact of the matter is SJ was open, wide open in terms of the NFL. The play worked. Fitz threw a terrible ball.

Posted

A coach should be able to trust his QB...his Harvard-educated, giant IQ QB, to make an intelligent throw.

 

It's always our QBs that make mistakes. No other QB in the league makes a mistake. Ugh. We have all the bad luck right?

Posted

I like the play call. The risk outweighed the reward in that case.

 

You like a play call where the risk outweighs the reward?

That's ........ unique.

Posted

Yep he threw off his back foot

 

He needed to put up high where only Stevie could get it

Fitzpatrick and Florences play are the only reasons we lost today...

Posted

I don't understand the posters who think it was a bad play to go for the endzone. If you execute, you're up 7 with 3 minutes to go, you give the D a chance to preserve the win for you, and you're in a situation where it would be very hard to lose in regulation. Not to mention its an Eli Manning lead team trying to go 80 yards for the tie. Eli is very caplable of doing Eli Manning type things.

 

And its not like Chan was asking Fitz to throw into triple coverage; Fitz had Stevie by a full two steps. Any NFL-caliber quarterback should be able to make that throw.

 

I would have taken my chances with an up 7 with 3 to go situation every single time.

 

+1!!!!!

 

7 > 3. I don't understand why people wanna settle for 3. If you take the 80 yard run away. Freddie had 15 carries for 41 yards. That's 2.7 YPC!!!

Posted

How is a short screen or short pass to Chandler better than what play we ran? Stevie was open. It was just a bad throw. A "safe pass" like a screen can easily lose yardage or result in a fumble. How is that better than what happened?

 

 

you really don't think that those plays are lower risk and don't have a greated chance of being completed (hence burning clock) than what was run?

 

Of course, there's always the chance that with new LT, and new OG, Fitzpatrick gets sacked and takes the game out of FG range. Not that something like that could possibly happen or anything....

Posted

Why ask him to throw that route there?

I'm not demanding he throw Fred and Corey into the middle of the pile, but there was NO need to attack the endzone in that situation

 

Exactly...

 

The fact that Stevie beat his man and the throw was the difference is exactly why you don't call that play there...It's just too much risk at that point of the Game...Why risk it? The Bills had taken the crowd out at that point...They have a 1st and 10 with 4 mins left and they have one of the 3 best RB's in Football...They just over-gambled...Even if they score there they are giving Eli the Ball back with PLENTY of time...Bare minimum you want to force the Giants to use their TO's at that point...Gailey and Fitz basically handed the Giants the chance to win the Game in regulation there...It was a bad Call...If everything goes perfect, and Stevie scores there then great...But it back-fired big time....BIG TIME!!! B-)

Posted

Any passing play is dangerous when you underthrow the receiver by 5 yards. That was a horribly inaccurate pass by Fitz. And lol at the people who think you can run 4+ minutes and 2 timeouts off the clock from the 25. C'mon man.

Posted

It's always our QBs that make mistakes. No other QB in the league makes a mistake. Ugh. We have all the bad luck right?

 

All QB's make mistakes, some much more than others. Today, Fitz was in the "more than others" group. The play was there, twice, yet twice he threw a miserably under thown ball.

Posted

This hindsight is a real great thing. The fact of the matter is SJ was open, wide open in terms of the NFL. The play worked. Fitz threw a terrible ball.

 

 

no hindsight here. Read the shoutbox, I was calling for running plays once Fitz hit the pass to Nelson to get into NYG territory.

×
×
  • Create New...