DaveinElma Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/obama-sends-100-u-military-advisors-uganda-193812911.html I'm sure the Dixie Chicks will be trashing Obama any day now.....
meazza Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/obama-sends-100-u-military-advisors-uganda-193812911.html I'm sure the Dixie Chicks will be trashing Obama any day now..... Ummm The Obama administration announced plans on Friday to send about 100 U.S. combat forces to Uganda to act as military advisers to Ugandan and African Union forces fighting the Lords' Resistance Army (LRA).
Jauronimo Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 Where is the outrage? Where is the "its not our job to police the world"? No cries of chickenhawk? The man promises and end to the two wars we were already in and instead escalates both dramatically, increases predator drone strikes (which he questioned the legaility of not long ago) and gets involved in Libya, Yemen and now has US troops running all over central Africa? Ummm Didn't Kennedy send advisers to Southeast Asia in the 1960s?
meazza Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 Didn't Kennedy send advisers to Southeast Asia in the 1960s? No clue.
/dev/null Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 Didn't Kennedy send advisers to Southeast Asia in the 1960s? I think it started with Ike in the 50s. But is it still Imperialism if a black guy does it?
Rob's House Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/obama-sends-100-u-military-advisors-uganda-193812911.html I'm sure the Dixie Chicks will be trashing Obama any day now..... I know what you're doing. He's sending them to AFRICA? That's inhabited by blacks? !@#$ing Racist
GG Posted October 14, 2011 Posted October 14, 2011 I think it started with Ike in the 50s. But is it still Imperialism if a black guy does it? Your timeline is off by a century or so, Va.
DrFishfinder Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 Ummm The Obama administration announced plans on Friday to send about 100 U.S. combat forces to Uganda to act as military advisers to Ugandan and African Union forces fighting the Lords' Resistance Army (LRA). Maybe Obama should be bringing the LRA here as advisers.
OCinBuffalo Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 Where is the outrage? Where is the "its not our job to police the world"? No cries of chickenhawk? The man promises and end to the two wars we were already in and instead escalates both dramatically, increases predator drone strikes (which he questioned the legaility of not long ago) and gets involved in Libya, Yemen and now has US troops running all over central Africa? Where's Micheal Moore saying "there is no African threat". Didn't Kennedy send advisers to Southeast Asia in the 1960s? Eisenhower. We backed into that war big time. The same thing can happen with this thing. We have 0 national interests in Africa that necessitate troops, and, we have no enemy that poses a serious threat. It's easier and cheaper to buy what we want. I pray this isn't like Somalia. That was a nightmare. Why are in we in Africa? Do they have any oil in Uganda?
olivier in france Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!!
Chef Jim Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!! So that makes this ok? The question is why do we feel the need to have "advisors" in all these countries?
DaveinElma Posted October 15, 2011 Author Posted October 15, 2011 Where's Micheal Moore saying "there is no African threat". Eisenhower. We backed into that war big time. The same thing can happen with this thing. We have 0 national interests in Africa that necessitate troops, and, we have no enemy that poses a serious threat. It's easier and cheaper to buy what we want. I pray this isn't like Somalia. That was a nightmare. Why are in we in Africa? Do they have any oil in Uganda? And its an ultra-violent war with atrocities being committed left and right. This is just such a horrible idea.
3rdnlng Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!! Per Diane Sawyer it's at least 1000 countries.
OCinBuffalo Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!! There's a major difference between CIA paramilitary and the actual military. The first is working for a contract, the second is serving the country, and that's where the trouble lies. We don't care much about a mercenary, who likely isn't even American, dying somewhere we don't care about. However, if a single soldier dies for his country in Uganda...well look at the lack of perspective over Iraq. Now we will have people looking for revenge, and politicians who don't want to look like they made a bad decision, deciding it's time to up the ante. We know how the story goes from there. And yes, I am aware that when we say "global war on terror" we mean it. We have troops fighting Islamist terror in the Philippines, and a ton of places, and nobody seems to care. Where's the "outrage"? The only reason they don't say anything about the civilian casualties of these other "wars" is that the "No Blood for Oil" charge doesn't stick well. There's a major difference between that, and this nonsense. In that our very real enemy is a world-wide organization, and we must bring the battle to his doorstep, everywhere he has one. What the F we have to do with an internal matter of one country who poses no threat to us at all(unlike Iraq, Iran, North Korea), and has no means, never mind plans, to attack us, I'll never know. This looks like Somalia all over again. Edited October 15, 2011 by OCinBuffalo
KD in CA Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 No clue. Good summation of every post you've ever made on PPP.
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2011 Posted October 15, 2011 you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!! But this is notable for being the first time in recorded history that we're pretending to give a **** about Africans.
Taro T Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 But this is notable for being the first time in recorded history that we're pretending to give a **** about Africans. So Somalia doesn't count?
olivier in france Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 But this is notable for being the first time in recorded history that we're pretending to give a **** about Africans. the only surprise is that the us governement officialy communicate on this... Africa has become the "hot place" in terms of global strategy. China is pushing strongly there, it's logical the US does the same.In that case the independance of south soudan is an american victory vs the chinese who strongly support Kartoum. The LRA was helped by Soudan and has now lost its logistic and supply road with the independance of south soudan. i suspect the US want to avoid the LRA to make some trouble in the new state of S Soudan as the LRA probably will move north to keep the contact with their supports from Kartoum
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 16, 2011 Posted October 16, 2011 So Somalia doesn't count? Feel the burn
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 you're funny guys.... are you aware there's probably more than an hundred countries in the world where there is at least 100 americans working either for the army, the CIA or other federal agencies?!! Stats cab be manipulated to show any claim you want. Would you know if those forces in 100 countries are actually the Marine Corps security forces stationed at US Embassys worldwide?
Recommended Posts