Max Fischer Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Moving on to the Giants, who are difficult to figure out. Terrible one week, resilient the next. Not sure why they have so much trouble running the ball, and for a Coughlin team, they can be very sloppy, undisciplined and susceptible to the big play. Plus, they may have one or two starters on the OL out . . . Nonetheless, it could be a tough game to win after the Giants bad loss to the Seahawks.
Stealth Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 The biggest challenge to me is how will the oline handle the pass rush of the giants. Tuck should be playing this game. I suspect to see a good dose of fred jackson and cj spiller as well as well as a big game from david nelson if we're gonna win. There won't be many opportunities to attack the giants down the field
Buftex Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Moving on to the Giants, who are difficult to figure out. Terrible one week, resilient the next. Not sure why they have so much trouble running the ball, and for a Coughlin team, they can be very sloppy, undisciplined and susceptible to the big play. Plus, they may have one or two starters on the OL out . . . Nonetheless, it could be a tough game to win after the Giants bad loss to the Seahawks. I will be at the Giants game, and I am amped...I know what you mean about them...it seems like the Giants have been a Jeckyl and Hyde team ever since Manning has been there...even the year they won the Super Bowl, they played pretty bad more than a time or two...
NJBuffFan Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I'll be there (my first game away from RWS)! Really, really hoping for a win especially since I'll be with Giants fans who have been talking crap all season.
BuffOrange Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I will be at the Giants game, and I am amped...I know what you mean about them...it seems like the Giants have been a Jeckyl and Hyde team ever since Manning has been there...even the year they won the Super Bowl, they played pretty bad more than a time or two... Very true. The only year they weren't sloppy and erratic was the year after they won the SB. They also apparently have no homefield advantage. Somebody told me Seattle turned the ball over twice in the redzone? If so wow, that's an even worse loss than I thought.
Kipers Hair Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 (edited) I thought we matched up well against the Eagles...however...the Giants, not so much. We'll have problems with their running game and D-Line....and dare I say, if you give Eli time, he can carve us up. I am not saying this is a slam dunk for the Giants, but I do think, unless someone steps up at WR and forces their safety(s) out of the box...things dont look so good for this coming week...Early guess, 27 - 13 Giants. Edited October 11, 2011 by Kipers Hair
NJBuffFan Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 (edited) We'll have problems with their running game I don't think they have much of a running game especially without Jacobs. Not sure if he's playing or not. Over 5 games they're averaging 83.8 rushing yards which is 27th is the league. Against Seattle, they averaged 2.8 yards per run. Edited October 11, 2011 by NJBuffFan
dpberr Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I feel good about the Giants game. Looks like Tuck and Jacobs will be out. Baas may be out as well, along with the starting RG Chris Snee. With those three out, Giants had a 2.8ypr. You can run on Osi. I hope the Bills direct the attack on his side just like Seattle did. That's his big weaknesses as a lineman...he can rush the passer sure, but he can't defend against the run. You can run on the Giants overall. Seahawks had 145 yards on the ground.
Max997 Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Moving on to the Giants, who are difficult to figure out. Terrible one week, resilient the next. Not sure why they have so much trouble running the ball, and for a Coughlin team, they can be very sloppy, undisciplined and susceptible to the big play. Plus, they may have one or two starters on the OL out . . . Nonetheless, it could be a tough game to win after the Giants bad loss to the Seahawks. Nonetheless? Really Giants can pass which obviously the bills have trouble defending but should be able to pick off a pass or two Bills still young and need a big road win
Talley56 Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Moving on to the Giants, who are difficult to figure out. Terrible one week, resilient the next. Not sure why they have so much trouble running the ball, and for a Coughlin team, they can be very sloppy, undisciplined and susceptible to the big play. Plus, they may have one or two starters on the OL out . . . Nonetheless, it could be a tough game to win after the Giants bad loss to the Seahawks. This scares me. I remember a few years back we played the Arizona Cardinals right after the Jets tore them apart and the Cards then proceeded to whoop us. Teams tend to play better after bad losses like that.
goblinwarren Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I wonder how Perry Fewell will game plan against the offense?
Realist Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Didn't the Eagles have a bad loss before they played us? They lost in the last seconds to the niners.
#34fan Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 If tuck and Jacobs are out for sure, then we really need to take advantage. We don't have anything that can stop Jacobs. And Fitz would normally be a sitting duck for um... Tuck. Anyways it could be a LONG day if Eli isn't subdued early. And by "sudued", I mean knocked on his azz. -Or Faceplanted. -Or swung in circles to the ground. How about all of the above? This is one of those games that could go either way. Still, If we show up to work like we did last week, We'll be extremely hard to beat.
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I'm a little confused by some of the analysis you guys are posting about this game. I'm not saying this game will be easy by any stretch and we may very well lose. But that said, that Giants have not been running the ball well at all, and quite frankly the Bills have defended the run well. As far as Fitz being a sitting duck... that hasn't been the case all season. He's been sacked 3 times I believe all year. Those aspects I'm not all that worried about.
Stealth Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I'm a little confused by some of the analysis you guys are posting about this game. I'm not saying this game will be easy by any stretch and we may very well lose. But that said, that Giants have not been running the ball well at all, and quite frankly the Bills have defended the run well. As far as Fitz being a sitting duck... that hasn't been the case all season. He's been sacked 3 times I believe all year. Those aspects I'm not all that worried about. I'll talk about this since I posted about it. True Fitz has only been sacked 3 times all year, but I'll use the cincy game as an example. There was numerous times in that game where pressure was felt by fitzpatrick. Anyone who knows anything about football and quarterback's who rely on "timing" know the easiest way to screw that up is pressure. The Giants have arguably some of the best pass rushers in football. To "not be worried" about a rookie playing LT against the Giants dline smh. I'm not saying the Giants will get after Fitz like he's Cutler, but there will not be time for long extended routes in this game. Fitz will have to play his game to perfection. With our only deep threat out for this game, and Harriston starting at LT it's a matchup worth watching
1billsfan Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 The Bills need to beat a beatable Giant team if they want a chance at the division. The Pats will probably lose only two more games before the last game Bills vs. Pats. Therefore the Bills need to keep pace and can only "afford" at most three slip-ups till then. I think they lose once to one of the three remaining NFC East games, once to the Jets, and once out of the other games on the schedule (perhaps Chargers?). This will leave the Bills playing the Pats for the division title in the last game of the season (since the Bills win the tiebreaker if they beat them and their records are the same). So to sum it up, they need to beat a Giant team that looks to be very average. Doesn't matter that it's an away game and the Giants will be playing angry after losing to the Seahawks.
Dorkington Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I really really hope we can win this going into the bye week. That being said, it's a road game against a tough defense, we saw what happened in Cinci... I have no idea, it's a total mystery to me.
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I really really hope we can win this going into the bye week. That being said, it's a road game against a tough defense, we saw what happened in Cinci... I have no idea, it's a total mystery to me. Hmm tough defense? The Giants have given up more points that we have...to bad teams...I'm not sure what you are referring to.
UConn James Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 I haven't followed other teams.... I thought they lost their top 2 CBs to knee injuries.
Max Fischer Posted October 11, 2011 Author Posted October 11, 2011 Nonetheless? Really Giants can pass which obviously the bills have trouble defending but should be able to pick off a pass or two Bills still young and need a big road win Yes, "Nonetheless." It's a common English term, meaning "however," despite everything to the contrary, etc. You should try it out.
Recommended Posts