1billsfan Posted October 3, 2011 Posted October 3, 2011 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b75_1317601049 The 2032 Democratic candidate for the President of the United States. BTW, I wonder what greedy corporation made that stupid hat of his.
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Does it really matter what the source is bro? Yes, actually. Which is why your opinions are universally crap. You have no capacity to filter arrant bull ****. As demonstrated not just by citing Infowars, but by asking "Does it really matter what the source is?" And I'm not your "bro," pal.
Chef Jim Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 And I'm not your "bro," pal. How about cuz...cuz you look like his cuz.
KD in CA Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 (edited) The 2032 Democratic candidate for the President of the United States. BTW, I wonder what greedy corporation made that stupid hat of his. http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/154822/college-know-it-all-hippies Edited October 4, 2011 by KD in CT
Wacka Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Dude the only motivating force those hippies have is a desire to get laid but an inability to pull it off through normal channels. :thumbsup: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b75_1317601049 Looks like the "Leave Brittany Alone" guy(?) dyed his hair.
/dev/null Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/154822/college-know-it-all-hippies Exactly what I thought of too
TPS Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 So, it looks like the left and right are starting to run with it... Paul and Nader
1billsfan Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Yes, actually. Which is why your opinions are universally crap. You have no capacity to filter arrant bull ****. As demonstrated not just by citing Infowars, but by asking "Does it really matter what the source is?" And I'm not your "bro," pal. You never have the balls to argue a topic on merit. You always lead with the "I'm insecure as hell so I'll put you down" foot. It's sad and boring. Sorry chief.
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 You never have the balls to argue a topic on merit. You always lead with the "I'm insecure as hell so I'll put you down" foot. It's sad and boring. Sorry chief. You have no merit. There's nothing to argue.
GG Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 So, it looks like the left and right are starting to run with it... Paul and Nader And this is a different time in American history, because ... ? Speaking of evil Wall Street, I can just imagine the bond & stock markets' reactions of a cabinet filled out by Paul, Nader, Kucinich & Chomsky.
TPS Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 And this is a different time in American history, because ... ? Speaking of evil Wall Street, I can just imagine the bond & stock markets' reactions of a cabinet filled out by Paul, Nader, Kucinich & Chomsky. Playing out that scenario... Stocks might initially react down, but would then rise, as the focus turned to creating jobs. Jobs and spending mean higher profits for corps. As for bonds (and the FED), it looks like they'd (the Paul-Nader ticket!!) return the ability to issue currency back to the Treasury, where it originated. The bond market (domestic investors) needs the government to issue securities (providing a risk-free asset) more than the government needs the bond market. Read Abba Lerner's ideas on functional finance.
RkFast Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Im confused (shocker)........unless I have money in the market AND was hoodwinked by an unethical investor working on my behalf, how was I "screwed over by Wall Street?"
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Im confused (shocker)........unless I have money in the market AND was hoodwinked by an unethical investor working on my behalf, how was I "screwed over by Wall Street?" They loaned you money, and expected you to pay it back. The !@#$ing bastards.
GG Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Playing out that scenario... Stocks might initially react down, but would then rise, as the focus turned to creating jobs. Jobs and spending mean higher profits for corps. Yes, Paul pulling the plug on DoD budget and Nader & Kucinich in charge of commerce would do wonders for job creation. As for bonds (and the FED), it looks like they'd (the Paul-Nader ticket!!) return the ability to issue currency back to the Treasury, where it originated. The bond market (domestic investors) needs the government to issue securities (providing a risk-free asset) more than the government needs the bond market. Read Abba Lerner's ideas on functional finance. Yup, get rid of the Fed, and return back to the goo dold days of 19th century finance. That will calm the global markets and solidify the USA's role as the reserve currency. Good plan.
Magox Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 On top of that we can allow South Africa to dictate the value of the US dollar. Splendid!!
Pete Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Speaking of evil Wall Street, I can just imagine the bond & stock markets' reactions of a cabinet filled out by Paul, Nader, Kucinich & Chomsky. That is my dream team right there! Nader and Paul are the only politicians I have any respect for
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 That is my dream team right there! Nader and Paul are the only politicians I have any respect for So, you have no respect for Obama? Reid? Pelosi?
Magox Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 That is my dream team right there! Nader and Paul are the only politicians I have any respect for Wow! I hope you're kiddin
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 Wow! I hope you're kiddin He's not. It's more funny than sad, really.
Recommended Posts