3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Economy/geithner-good-chance-jobs-act-pass/story?id=14609951 I think I'd rather have them spend the billions on buying autos and what not and then raffling them off to recoup the money. Just think about the amount of jobs it would create. They could even only purchase high mpg autos and call the program something like the Green Stimulous Program. I guarantee that this makes more sense than what they are going to do with the money! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Economy/geithner-good-chance-jobs-act-pass/story?id=14609951 I think I'd rather have them spend the billions on buying autos and what not and then raffling them off to recoup the money. Just think about the amount of jobs it would create. They could even only purchase high mpg autos and call the program something like the Green Stimulous Program. I guarantee that this makes more sense than what they are going to do with the money! White House's jobs plan would cost $200,000, but said the pricetag is the wrong way to measure the bill's worth. well Timmy, in the real world that is how everything is measured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 (edited) well Timmy, in the real world that is how everything is measured. In Washington, such things are measured in votes. Or, occasionally, BCEs (Bill Clinton Equivalents.) Waaaaaaait a minute...is that $200k per job created, or per job created or saved? Can we be clear up-front on that this time, please? Edited September 27, 2011 by DC Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts