saundena Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Although most of them expect to win, they collectively seem to be pretty nervous about this game. Common themes: 1. The Bills are do for a win. 2. The FANS will be amped up. Worried about noise, atmosphere etc. 3. The Bills know how to score points. 4. They respect Fitz. 5. Not too worried about our D. 6. Confident that in a shootout, Brady will bring them to the promised land. 7. Should be a hard fought game. 8. Seem to be much more intelligent than the KC fans from week 1. BONUS. One of the posters said that the Bills K-gun is back and another poster corrected him and said it should be called the F-Gun. That that was pretty funny
Clippers of Nfl Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 (edited) on this board 1. The Bills are due for a win. 2. The FANS will be amped up. Worried about noise, atmosphere etc. 3. The Bills know how to score points. 4. They respect Fitz. 5. Not too worried about our D. 6. Confident that in a shootout, Brady will bring them to the promised land. 7. Should be a hard fought game. 8. Seem to be much more intelligent than the KC fans from week 1. BONUS. One of the posters said that the Bills K-gun is back and another poster corrected him and said it should be called the F-Gun. That that was pretty funny fixed it Edited September 21, 2011 by Clippers of Nfl
Just Jack Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 BONUS. One of the posters said that the Bills K-gun is back and another poster corrected him and said it should be called the F-Gun. That that was pretty funny Except they are thinking the K-Gun was named after Kelly, but it's actually named after Keith McKeller.
billsfaninvgs Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 I thought someone on this board suggested the F-Bomb? I like that better...
BuffaloBill Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 This will be a very interesting game ... It will really tell us where the Bills are physically, mentally and with respect to game planning. Gailey will need to be at his best.
bladiebla Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 F-Gun .... likey likey... Fred .. Fitz...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 It's going to be tough to slow down NE's O. They have so many weapons and Marcia Brady is very good at taking what the D will give them. After watching Leodis "the non-factor" McLovin get owned by a bench-warmer, I don't have a lot of faith in our D. Hopefully we can win a shootout. This will be a very interesting game ... It will really tell us where the Bills are physically, mentally and with respect to game planning. Gailey will need to be at his best. Among many other factors, this will be a key aspect to Sunday's game. Can Gailey match wits with the hooded one?
OvrOfficiousJerk Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 Except they are thinking the K-Gun was named after Kelly, but it's actually named after Keith McKeller. Why was it named after Keith McKeller? I feel I heard that before, and (apologize to the Open Source types on the board) from a better source than Wikipedia. Back on topic, I checked Pats' message boards too, and I got the same feeling -- Bills are different this year. They also took a couple cheap shots at Buffalo but hey that's to be expected.
chris heff Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 Except they are thinking the K-Gun was named after Kelly, but it's actually named after Keith McKeller. I thought it was Kent Hull.
Just Jack Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 Why was it named after Keith McKeller? I feel I heard that before, and (apologize to the Open Source types on the board) from a better source than Wikipedia. I thought it was Kent Hull. I could only find this other article... http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/12/2/1848736/december-2-1990-bills-unveil-no-huddle-offense
truth on hold Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 Why don't you post as Giselle over there and say you don't want Williams or dareus hurting my Tommy.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) One thing Saundena didn't list in his account of the Patsies* message board is the fact that for two years now, the New England defense has sucked. If there's one thing that the Chowds should be nervous about, it's that our offense looks good and that their defense remains mediocre. You can understand San Diego lighting them up but Miami did too. Edited September 22, 2011 by San Jose Bills Fan
Donald Duck Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 I could only find this other article... http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/12/2/1848736/december-2-1990-bills-unveil-no-huddle-offense Jim Kelly loved throwing to his TE's
Phil Hansen Forever Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 I thought it was Kent Hull. Nope, it was Keith McKeller.
QB Bills Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 Nope, it was Keith McKeller. I read that it was Kool from Kool and the Gang.
beerme1 Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 I read that it was Kool from Kool and the Gang. Who's founding member was from Buffalo no?
OvrOfficiousJerk Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 I could only find this other article... http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/12/2/1848736/december-2-1990-bills-unveil-no-huddle-offense Thanks for the link JJ, the article makes it little bit more plausible for me that it was named after McKeller. I guess by "agile" they mean that McKeller was a good pass-catcher as well as blocker (I was just getting out of diapers during the start of the Bills' glory years, so I don't have much recollection of McKeller's abilities), so having someone that could serve in both roles makes a run play a credible threat when you can't make subs. At any rate, again to go back on topic.... One thing Saundena didn't list in his account of the Patsies* message board is the fact that for two years now, the New England defense has sucked. If there's one thing that the Chowds should be nervous about, it's that our offense looks good and that their defense remains mediocre. You can understand San Diego lighting them up but Miami did too. For exactly that reason, I am giving serious consideration to a Fitzpatrick-Nelson-Jackson-Chandler axis for one of my fantasy teams (FYI, I have Vick who's Questionable at the moment, totally blew my WR picks and my TE just might be involved in a blowout). For the past few years, NE's D has not been what it used to be. If you look at the NE glory years, with McGinest-Vrabel-Bruschi et al as LBs, Ty Law-Rodney Harrison in the secondary, they had a dominant D. You knew exactly who you were up against. Now, when I was watching the MNF game, I needed Google on hand to get their D straight: all I know now is Wilfork because he's dirty, a bloated Albert Haynesworth bc of the contract issue and then "everybody, [Pat] Chung tonight" because of a crappy 80s song. Far cry from 2001-04 Pats.
Overseas Bills Fan Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 I am expecting a loss here. Until our defense shores up some, I see another Brady passing-fest and more Brady-gasm!
ETD66SS Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) I just watched the Bills/Raiders game on NFL replay. The Bills will lose to the Pats. The only hope is that if NE has a very bad day with turning the ball over. Hoping for a win ofc, but honestly am not expecting a good showing at all, especially on D. I see Brady raping the Bills D with screen passes and Woodhead runs all day... This could be the first bad loss for the Bills this year, bringing everyone back down to reality, and the national media saying "told you so, Bills are pretenders" Edited September 22, 2011 by ETD66SS
Recommended Posts