meazza Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 5:16 PM, KD in CT said: "Peace is hard" What exactly do you disagree with his statement?
KD in CA Posted September 21, 2011 Author Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 5:47 PM, meazza said: What exactly do you disagree with his statement? Where exactly did I say I disagreed with anything in his statement?
meazza Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 5:48 PM, KD in CT said: Where exactly did I say I disagreed with anything in his statement? The forehead slapping sort of gave it away.
KD in CA Posted September 21, 2011 Author Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 5:52 PM, meazza said: The forehead slapping sort of gave it away. So in other words, I didn't say that at all, huh? I merely made an observation about the similarity between Obama's choice of words and those of the Bills' maligned former coach. You Obamaphiles sure are thin-skinned these days.
meazza Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 7:34 PM, DC Tom said: Judging by you two, peace IS hard. Judging by this op-ed, I agree. My link
DC Tom Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 7:37 PM, meazza said: Judging by this op-ed, I agree. My link Of course, no one ever realizes that no one's pursuing peace in that conflict...they're "participating in a peace process". 'Cause...y'know...as long as they're participating in the process, they can kill each other to their hearts' content. Because it's a process. Whoever decided the "peace process" was in itself a worthwhile pursuit is retarded.
Joe Miner Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 5:16 PM, KD in CT said: "Peace is hard" That's way too much information about Peace.
3rdnlng Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 (edited) On 9/21/2011 at 7:59 PM, Joe Miner said: That's way too much information about Peace. Seeing that, I'm surprised Hedd hasn't come out of the woodwork. Edited September 21, 2011 by 3rdnlng
DC Tom Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 8:02 PM, 3rdnlng said: Seeing that, I'm surprised Hedd hasn't come out of the woodwork. That doesn't call him. You have to say "Levi Johnston" three times.
3rdnlng Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 8:23 PM, DC Tom said: That doesn't call him. You have to say "Levi Johnston" three times. How about "tap three times"?
/dev/null Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 8:37 PM, 3rdnlng said: How about "tap three times"? Hedd wants Levi Johnston to tap 3 times
3rdnlng Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 8:45 PM, /dev/null said: Hedd wants Levi Johnston to tap 3 times Be clear! Tap the floor? Tap the pipes? Tap him?
EC-Bills Posted September 22, 2011 Posted September 22, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 7:59 PM, Joe Miner said: That's way too much information about Peace.
OCinBuffalo Posted September 23, 2011 Posted September 23, 2011 On 9/21/2011 at 7:52 PM, DC Tom said: Of course, no one ever realizes that no one's pursuing peace in that conflict...they're "participating in a peace process". 'Cause...y'know...as long as they're participating in the process, they can kill each other to their hearts' content. Because it's a process. Whoever decided the "peace process" was in itself a worthwhile pursuit is retarded. I keep trying to tell you: Peace is a phony
/dev/null Posted September 23, 2011 Posted September 23, 2011 On 9/23/2011 at 8:48 AM, OCinBuffalo said: I keep trying to tell you: Peace is a phony Peace Sells.
Jauronimo Posted September 23, 2011 Posted September 23, 2011 On 9/23/2011 at 11:52 AM, /dev/null said: Peace Sells. I like the Swiss method of peace. We'll hold all your gold, sell both sides weapons, grant airspace and land travel to the highest bidder and if you lose we'll keep your gold. They really figured out that whole neutrality thing like some sort of advanced watch.
Recommended Posts